Topic: Man was made to reason, woman to feel.
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 weeks ago #137,294
The disintegration in society today stems from the rejection of that fundamental truth.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 12 minutes later[^] [v] #1,454,819
@OP
> The disintegration in society today stems from the rejection of that fundamental truth.
OK, so Eve took a bite of the apple and ended up having sons, use her in ways, you do not want to think about.
Disintegration of society started with the simple bite of the apple.
> The disintegration in society today stems from the rejection of that fundamental truth.
OK, so Eve took a bite of the apple and ended up having sons, use her in ways, you do not want to think about.
Disintegration of society started with the simple bite of the apple.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,820
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,837
@OP
> The disintegration in society today stems from the rejection of that fundamental truth.
Ngl, I’m Catholic and I’m not against the idea of God, but this claim you’re making sounds more like you’re being emotional and lashing out at women than any actual truth.
> The disintegration in society today stems from the rejection of that fundamental truth.
Ngl, I’m Catholic and I’m not against the idea of God, but this claim you’re making sounds more like you’re being emotional and lashing out at women than any actual truth.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,847
@1,454,819 (B)
> > The disintegration in society today stems from the rejection of that fundamental truth.
>
> OK, so Eve took a bite of the apple and ended up having sons, use her in ways, you do not want to think about.
>
> Disintegration of society started with the simple bite of the apple.
Would you rather be pampered pets in plastic Eden or a human with agency and responsibility and reason? Lucifer made Mankind see the light. He loves you for who and what you are. He asks that you embrace creativity and sexuality and physical strength. Man was not meant to live on his knees, bowing, craven, begging.
> > The disintegration in society today stems from the rejection of that fundamental truth.
>
> OK, so Eve took a bite of the apple and ended up having sons, use her in ways, you do not want to think about.
>
> Disintegration of society started with the simple bite of the apple.
Would you rather be pampered pets in plastic Eden or a human with agency and responsibility and reason? Lucifer made Mankind see the light. He loves you for who and what you are. He asks that you embrace creativity and sexuality and physical strength. Man was not meant to live on his knees, bowing, craven, begging.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,850
@previous (D)
Yeah, Satan also has Kung Fu panda Wednesdays down in hell where they all order tacos and watch Kung Fu panda on Wednesday. But all the raping and the flaying is 100% true they really do that.
Yeah, Satan also has Kung Fu panda Wednesdays down in hell where they all order tacos and watch Kung Fu panda on Wednesday. But all the raping and the flaying is 100% true they really do that.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 9 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,854
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
> Yeah, Satan also has Kung Fu panda Wednesdays down in hell where they all order tacos and watch Kung Fu panda on Wednesday. But all the raping and the flaying is 100% true they really do that.
Satan isn’t real. Neither is your sky fairy. Some men tell you to tithe and say they speak on behalf of an all-powerful God. And you believe them. With no evidence, an old book, a ton of contradictions, and a Church history of mayhem, theft and murder.
> Yeah, Satan also has Kung Fu panda Wednesdays down in hell where they all order tacos and watch Kung Fu panda on Wednesday. But all the raping and the flaying is 100% true they really do that.
Satan isn’t real. Neither is your sky fairy. Some men tell you to tithe and say they speak on behalf of an all-powerful God. And you believe them. With no evidence, an old book, a ton of contradictions, and a Church history of mayhem, theft and murder.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 56 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,856
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 46 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,858
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
> Lucifer and Satan are the same person.
I’m aware, as is everyone.
> Lucifer and Satan are the same person.
I’m aware, as is everyone.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 12 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,859
@1,454,837 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
No definition of emotional matches what I said.
You can't just take an accusation I put to you, reverse it, and act like it's the same.
When I said you were emotional I gave an example of your behavior, and showed how it fit.
Neither giving a theory about something, nor criticizing a group matches the meaning of "emotional".
No definition of emotional matches what I said.
You can't just take an accusation I put to you, reverse it, and act like it's the same.
When I said you were emotional I gave an example of your behavior, and showed how it fit.
Neither giving a theory about something, nor criticizing a group matches the meaning of "emotional".
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 26 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,860
@1,454,858 (D)
Is that why you started yapping about your support for Lucifer then proudly declared Satan doesn’t exist?
Is that why you started yapping about your support for Lucifer then proudly declared Satan doesn’t exist?
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,861
@1,454,859 (A)
There isn’t really a rational reason to criticize an entire group of people for something. You’re just doing that because you’re emotional.
There isn’t really a rational reason to criticize an entire group of people for something. You’re just doing that because you’re emotional.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,863
@1,454,860 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
> Is that why you started yapping about your support for Lucifer then proudly declared Satan doesn’t exist?
In a different poster. You misunderstood, as usual. Then hang on some minor point. Even Luciferians don’t believe in a material Satan. Because there’s no such thing. Maybe had the Gnostics won out and you had two diametrically opposed equal powers would any of this make sense. As is, Satan is an employee of God who punishes the wicked. Except when he leads an army against God and inevitably loses. It’s a bad comic book.
> Is that why you started yapping about your support for Lucifer then proudly declared Satan doesn’t exist?
In a different poster. You misunderstood, as usual. Then hang on some minor point. Even Luciferians don’t believe in a material Satan. Because there’s no such thing. Maybe had the Gnostics won out and you had two diametrically opposed equal powers would any of this make sense. As is, Satan is an employee of God who punishes the wicked. Except when he leads an army against God and inevitably loses. It’s a bad comic book.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 47 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,864
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,867
@previous (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
> So you don’t believe in Lucifer then.
Lucifer is a convenient antagonist to counter stupid faith-based reasoning. The God of the Bible is jealous and merciful and murderously schizophrenic. But He loves you. And answers your prayers for a good math test. And frowns upon you masturbating. And has nothing better to do than demand his minions hear your confessions about trivialities to dispense judgments on His behalf.
> So you don’t believe in Lucifer then.
Lucifer is a convenient antagonist to counter stupid faith-based reasoning. The God of the Bible is jealous and merciful and murderously schizophrenic. But He loves you. And answers your prayers for a good math test. And frowns upon you masturbating. And has nothing better to do than demand his minions hear your confessions about trivialities to dispense judgments on His behalf.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,868
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,871
Like you’re just yapping about reasons why you don’t like God, as you imagine God in your own head. That doesn’t have anything to do with me or what I care about.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,873
Don’t get me wrong, it’s not bad to think about this stuff, but different people have different priorities. What I’ve realized is, it doesn’t really matter what you believe, because we’re all going to die anyway.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 8 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,875
@OPenis has never kissed a girl.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,877
@1,454,873 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
> Don’t get me wrong, it’s not bad to think about this stuff, but different people have different priorities. What I’ve realized is, it doesn’t really matter what you believe, because we’re all going to die anyway.
TRUTH
> Don’t get me wrong, it’s not bad to think about this stuff, but different people have different priorities. What I’ve realized is, it doesn’t really matter what you believe, because we’re all going to die anyway.
TRUTH
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,878
.
(Edited 10 seconds later.)
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 23 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,879
For me just the fact that there’s anything at all instead of nothing, or the fact that when you look up at the night sky, we can’t see everything because of the limitations of our eyes and the speed of light, but the universe may very well be infinite in size, like actually infinite there might be no end to space. And billions of years of time occurred before I was conscious of anything. That’s really hard to comprehend. I just I don’t think I can put it into words really.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,880
And then we’re finite, we all die, and we don’t live long enough and can’t travel fast enough to see the universe. If the universe is infinite, and will continue on forever, the percentage of it we experience is 0%.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc quadruple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,881
Like literally the farthest any object humans have ever sent from earth, Voyager 1 was launched in 1977, and it’s about 16 billion miles from Earth now, but the closest star (not counting the sun because duh), is 25 trillion miles away. I wasn’t even born in 1977. It’s ridiculous, and there are 100 billion to 400 billion stars in just our galaxy. I feel like it’s wrong to act arrogant like I know what the true nature of the universe is. Idk. Humanity could be wrong about a lot. It’s easy to imagine a civilization that’s far more advanced than we are.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc quintuple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,882
And that things literally going at 10 miles per second.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc sextuple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,883
Like, we literally need to travel at least a thousand times faster to have any hope of even getting to the closest star. It was only possible to even get to 10 miles per second because coincidentally the planets lined up in just the right way to use gravity assist on the gas giants.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 55 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,885
@1,454,861 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
"rational reason" is redundant.
Whether my observations about a group are accurate or inaccurate, providing reasons for a belief is approaching it rationally. I've met many people I disagree with who approach issues rationally.
When you are unable to provide a reason for an obvious contradiction (like saying education increased IQ prior to going through said education) and instead share your emotions (talking about how much you hate me) that fits squarely within the definitions of irrational and emotional. That would be true, even if you were right about IQ being a poor metric for intelligence.
I didn't create these words or their meanings, and simply throwing back my accusations without thinking about the meanings of words doesn't work.
"rational reason" is redundant.
Whether my observations about a group are accurate or inaccurate, providing reasons for a belief is approaching it rationally. I've met many people I disagree with who approach issues rationally.
When you are unable to provide a reason for an obvious contradiction (like saying education increased IQ prior to going through said education) and instead share your emotions (talking about how much you hate me) that fits squarely within the definitions of irrational and emotional. That would be true, even if you were right about IQ being a poor metric for intelligence.
I didn't create these words or their meanings, and simply throwing back my accusations without thinking about the meanings of words doesn't work.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,886
@previous (A)
That’s not a contradiction, the biggest predictor of your success in life is the success of your parents. If your parents are educated, you’re more likely to receive an education because educated parents are educated on how to give their children an education.
That’s not a contradiction, the biggest predictor of your success in life is the success of your parents. If your parents are educated, you’re more likely to receive an education because educated parents are educated on how to give their children an education.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc double-posted this 2 weeks ago, 49 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,887
I also wasn’t unable to provide an explanation, you simply did not bother asking out of arrogance.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc triple-posted this 2 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,888
By the way, "rational reason" is actually not redundant. Having a reason for doing something and that reason being a rational reason are two completely different concepts.
Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 6 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,890
You know for someone who’s always kicking and screaming that every person on the planet who’s not you that doesn’t agree with you is irrational and you’re the only one true source of perfect rationality in the world because you’re a white man (I’m also white and a man), it sure is ironic you think "rational reason" is redundant. If you’re so smart, why do you think "rational reason" is redundant? Everything happens for a reason. There’s a reason why terrorists flew a plane into the twin towers on 9/11. I sure fucking hope you don’t think it was a rational one.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 weeks ago, 2 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,454,926
@1,454,887 (Mr. Bloody Lemonade !0JqexkOGBc)
> I also wasn’t unable to provide an explanation, you simply did not bother asking out of arrogance.
I pointed out the error first here: https://minichan.net/topic/137247#reply_1454551
> it predicts scores and outcomes even as children are starting their education.
Then I asked here: https://minichan.net/topic/137247#reply_1454554
> How does the test know if they will get a lot of education or not? The test itself predicts what level of education they will get later.
And when you ignored those two posts, I tried a third time here: https://minichan.net/topic/137247#reply_1454561
> How is "education" and "socioeconomic" factors the answer if it's at the start of their education, and the tests predicts which poor kids will outperform the rich kids 🤔
Why do you lie when there are reciepts? Do you realize how stupid and dishonest this makes you look?
> I also wasn’t unable to provide an explanation, you simply did not bother asking out of arrogance.
I pointed out the error first here: https://minichan.net/topic/137247#reply_1454551
> it predicts scores and outcomes even as children are starting their education.
Then I asked here: https://minichan.net/topic/137247#reply_1454554
> How does the test know if they will get a lot of education or not? The test itself predicts what level of education they will get later.
And when you ignored those two posts, I tried a third time here: https://minichan.net/topic/137247#reply_1454561
> How is "education" and "socioeconomic" factors the answer if it's at the start of their education, and the tests predicts which poor kids will outperform the rich kids 🤔
Why do you lie when there are reciepts? Do you realize how stupid and dishonest this makes you look?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 2 weeks ago, 3 days later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,455,425
2B or not 2B