Minichan

Topic: I wish biological determinism was true

Anonymous A started this discussion 4 weeks ago #134,746

Whenever I see some white people on the internet commenting about how they’re so superior because they have high IQs an all the dirty brown people have low IQs according to them, you have no idea how much I wish it was true. I wish white people were actually all smart. Do you know how much better America would be if all the white people in this county were smart?

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,433,734

And the idea that rich people are smart and poor people are dumb, can you imagine if that was true? Donald Trump would be a fucking hobo, that would be awesome.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,433,771

I wish society would get it in their heads that those IQ narratives are purely for creating strife among the communities by higher ups consisting of wealthy blacks, whites, browns-you name it.

Anonymous B double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,433,772

IQ is arbitrary. A socially constructed, relative metric. If people were to understand this then they wouldn’t waste their time in engaging in obvious ragebaits all the fucking time.

Consider this: those who use IQ metrics to make it a point of superiority based on race. dont really care about the data or even the logic behind it, they just want you to seethe and cope because they’re doing the same thing, seething and coping.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,433,787

@previous (B)

> IQ is arbitrary. A socially constructed, relative metric.

https://minichan.net/topic/134411

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 21 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,433,790

this is a retarded claim to make no matter how many times you sockpuppet it, nigger.

boof joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,433,793

@1,433,772 (B)
it was designed to predict success level in future schooling. it was found to be the second best predictor, the first best being past success level.

Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 4 weeks ago, 3 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,433,822

Tbh it would be nice if powerful and wealthy people actually had better genetics. It would be easier to look at congress if they were actually attractive people.

This is such a shallow take.

Mr. Black Boi double-posted this 4 weeks ago, 14 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,433,826

@1,433,772 (B)

> IQ is arbitrary. A socially constructed, relative metric.

It is kinda funny though, when I was younger in school there was a group for gifted students and how it would work is they would test all the students IQ and then only students with above a certain IQ could be in that program. And I remember talking to other students, IQ varies a lot between individuals. It just out of that subset of students peoples IQs were ranging between 120 and 140, and there couldn’t have been more than 10 or 15 students out of the ~ 1,000 students in the school then saying idk, Nigerians are inferior to Japanese people because Nigerians score 90 on average and Japanese people score 100 on average is dumb when if you have a room of like 10 or 15 people the scores vary that much. Then when I talked with students who weren’t in that program, they still had their IQ tested, and there were some students, like I remember one girl (who was white) said she got 80 something. So if people’s IQs are varying that much between individuals it seems illogical to say that you can judge any individual based on the average score a certain demographic gets. That part is just kinda stupid. And why would wealthier more educated people not score higher just because they’re more educated? They act like it’s evidence of some biological difference, but even from a genetic perspective, that doesn’t really make sense since sub Saharan Africans have a million more genetic variants than every other ethnicity outside of Africa since humans lived and evolved in Africa for longer, so "sub Saharan African" can’t even be defined as a distinct genetic group with one commonality, because it isn’t. Even the genes that cause skin color are pretty complex, Africans have dark skin but it’s actually caused by completely different genes in different places.

Mr. Black Boi triple-posted this 4 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,433,827

I guess the closest thing to a distinct genetic group that defines sub Saharan Africans would be Bantu, but not all black people are Bantu.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 17 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,433,937

@previous (Mr. Black Boi)
the correct way to group up all the sub-sarahans would be to create a new species in the homo genus and throw them all in there. we could play off of humanities scientific name of Homo Sapiens and name this new nigger species Homo Stultus.

Mr. Black Boi joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,433,997

@previous (G)
That’s retarded. Homo sapiens originated in sub Saharan Africa, and Europeans are mixed with Neanderthals.

Anonymous G replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,434,004

@previous (Mr. Black Boi)
wrong.

Anonymous G double-posted this 3 weeks ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,434,005

@1,433,997 (Mr. Black Boi)
I tried to post an image format thats too advanced for this site. Ere we go.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 3 weeks ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,434,251

OIL CRISIS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXNLaHsKMz8
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.