!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 5 minutes later[^][v]#1,257,314
My decadanal pay corrected for northern inflation, quasi-socialistically corrected food theft from "linear heirarchical gypsy lineage taxes", and a whole bunch of other factors is probably realistically this.
I refuse to account for it as a /capita figure of the GDP this country, frankly, using the closest model to MMP I've ever had; my script as an entrance of miscellaneous material the 2007 exam.
North Koreans when visiting me in the diplomatic segment streets this country chuck out as passers-by comments that I'm not far off at Britain being a ~$600/capita society vis. $2,900 the actual, non-CIA bullshit figure the DPRK, and that this would constitute 1st and 10th in real world ranks, the Americans lying for much of 100 Adam Lyle multiples in drunken pseudo-IQ grandeur their Asperger mis-written wealth.
Anonymous F replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,257,396
@previous (Erik !saAqdaazn2)
Your monthly income is barely anything yet you’re always going off on vacations and out drinking. The amount of money you make a month wouldn’t even be enough to pay a mortgage on a condo where I live. I just thought you made good money.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 42 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,257,425
@1,257,406 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You've also claimed Svet makes a good amount of money. So, yeah, sounds like yet another topic where your views are worth nothing.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,257,470
@previous (J)
Even if you take home a smaller fraction of it, it is still more money that you have at the end of the day. Using your logic, you wouldn't want to make more than minimum wage because otherwise you'd be out of the lowest tax bracket.
Anonymous J replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,257,483
@1,257,480 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
If I'm taxed at 20% for an hour of work and then 40% for the next hour, I am disincentivized from working further hours.
Anonymous I replied with this 1 year ago, 4 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,257,487
Although to say that you're paying 0% on 0 income inadvertently opens up a whole can of mathematical paradoxes. And if your goal is only to pay the minimal fraction of taxes, it'd be best to avoid making no money, or else we create bigger conceptual fish to fry in figuring out what it even means to have fractions of zero.
Anonymous J replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,257,488
@previous (I)
The goal is to have as much ownership of the proceeds of your labour as possible within your locale, while enjoying a comfortable lifestyle
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,257,502
@1,257,481 (I)
The true sigma grindset. @1,257,483 (J)
If you're paid hourly and work part time I guess that's true, but it's very unusual that you would be earning at the highest tax bracket working part time hourly. Mostly you're just working whatever hours your employer requires you to work, so you want the highest salary or hourly rate you can get.
Anonymous J replied with this 1 year ago, 32 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,257,519
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You're making a ton of assumptions about his job. Some of which we know aren't true. We also don't know if his compensation could reasonably be much higher in his line of work. Once he hits that 40% tax bracket he is disincentivized from working more hours. It's a well known feature of progressive income tax systems. It does the same on the other end too, which you and Anon I seem to have no problem understanding.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 1 year ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,257,874
@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
He answered "yes" to the question of whether he would support a 10% Zelenskiy tax. Why are you constantly defending the racist anti-semite who pretends to be outraged because white people are being bombed rather than the brown ones he prefers?
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 1 year ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#1,257,880
@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Question: "Do you think Sunak should make a law whereby 10% of every Brit's salary goes directly to Ukraine so they can win this war. Would you support this?"
Svet's answer: "Yes I would".
His X amount qualification refers to anyone earning over 35k. He earns significantly more than that.
Now, for being a berk, go donate 100 euros to Zelenskiy. He's sending a generation of Ukrainian men to die so that Dutch people can live in freedom.
At least you're honest. Mr "fuck niggers and Jews" (Svet), who hilariously said I didn't meet his moral standards because I call for peace negotiations, openly lies about caring about piles of dead Ukrainians.