Topic: Indy explains the "underage sex" loophole.
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #111,164
https://minichan.net/topic/111155#reply_1235612
> in the Middle Ages, yes, she was of age.
Anything goes at the renaissance faire. Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,235,619
The Middle Ages were roughly from 500-1500 CE. In much of that time, teenage girls were married off as a matter of course.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,621
@previous (B)
That's as good a reason as any for someone in the 21st century to write a graphic scene depicting just that.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,622
@previous (A)
You mean historical fiction? Glad you agree.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,624
@previous (B)
Whatever sort of fiction that gives the author justification for multipage depictions of underage sex.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,634
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Do you think string theory is a reasonable idea?
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,635
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
It is almost all he talks about. Weird.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,636
@previous (B)
I talk about more than quanta.
Father Nigger !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 45 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,642
↕