Topic: We need to have a serious talk about harassment on this site.
Green !!bO/s3MBcD started this discussion 2 years ago #111,155
I feel like there has been a lot of harassment on this site recently. I know Indy has been targeted relentlessly and it has been made to look like he is the one causing the drama. He is not. Sure, he can be annoying sometimes I'll admit, but he is still a great poster. And while I can not speak for Kook, I feel like she has been harassed too, maybe by the same poster. I have also been harassed, and I'm sure this thread will bring about more harassment but honestly this problem needs to be brought to light. It also seems to be an anonymous user. and whilst there is no love lost between Svet and myself, I at least respect him for having the temerity to insult me with his handle. I haven't personally raised this issue with the mods, maybe I should have but I am now. We have lost great users over the years and we don't want any more to be driven off, especially with the recent 4 day old bumps on the front page. I think if we can make this site friendlier with no unwarranted hostility we could lure back some of the old posters and maybe draw in new ones. Just my thoughts.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,235,492
I agree. you are 100% right. It is 1, maybe 2 anonymous posters who spend several hours every day here nastily and snarkily harassing and hating on people. It is destroying the last good parts of Minichan. The mods do not seem to care. this place used to be really fun and nice, but that sort of cancer will destroy it. Please, please, mods, do something about the 1 or 2 harassers/stalkers.
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
Green !!bO/s3MBcD (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,494
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 54 seconds later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,495
I agree. Squeegee must go. She's been stalking and harassing Kook ever since she came back and now with her more recent mental break, what better time could there be for her to part ways with the fora?
(Edited 21 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,496
@previous (C)
See, you are one of the harassers. Stop this shit. Stop trying to blame everyone else.
See, you are one of the harassers. Stop this shit. Stop trying to blame everyone else.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 46 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,498
@previous (B)
You sound like you've been stalking a man in California for 25 years. You're part of the problem.
You sound like you've been stalking a man in California for 25 years. You're part of the problem.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,499
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,501
@previous (B)
No, you are the problem. If you and squeegee are banned, 100% of the stalking/harassment will be gone.
No, you are the problem. If you and squeegee are banned, 100% of the stalking/harassment will be gone.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,503
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 46 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,505
Green !!bO/s3MBcD (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,506
@1,235,498 (C)
I see it the other way round, the elderly gentleman in question seemed to follow Indy around and provoke him, when Indy responded it was turned on him and he was made out to be the problem. No doubt I'll get shit for defending Indy, but Indy has been nothing but kind to me and I think enough is enough. Also Kook doesn't deserve any of this. And I'm not white knighting, Kook has been a good friend to me also over the years. Also a bit odd how anyone that defends Indy also gets harassed 🤔
I see it the other way round, the elderly gentleman in question seemed to follow Indy around and provoke him, when Indy responded it was turned on him and he was made out to be the problem. No doubt I'll get shit for defending Indy, but Indy has been nothing but kind to me and I think enough is enough. Also Kook doesn't deserve any of this. And I'm not white knighting, Kook has been a good friend to me also over the years. Also a bit odd how anyone that defends Indy also gets harassed 🤔
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,508
@previous (Green !!bO/s3MBcD)
> I see it the other way round, the elderly gentleman in question seemed to follow Indy around and provoke him, when Indy responded it was turned on him and he was made out to be the problem.
He's been gone for years, and Indy still obsesses over him. Indy also used to regularly post Syntax's wife's picture and other personal details of Syntax's family (before tteh put a stop to it). Indy started harassing Syntax after Syntax had contacted the FBI and alerted them Indy was writing sex stories about his underage students, thus commencing Indy's 25 year long stalking and harassment campaign against Syntax. Syntax retaliated, but Indy instigated it all and kept it all alive for decades (even now, despite Syntax having moved on years ago from the chans).
> No doubt I'll get shit for defending Indy, but Indy has been nothing but kind to me and I think enough is enough.
I seem to remember him throwing you under the bus more than once saying something to the effect of, "at least I contribute and don't only shitpost like green" more than once when threatened with a ban.
> Also Kook doesn't deserve any of this. And I'm not white knighting, Kook has been a good friend to me also over the years.
I agree. Which is why it's so unreal that squeegee gets to come back after all these years and stalk/dox/harass her with impunity. Let's put a fucking end it to it for christ sake. She literally wrote a death threat to tteh in the other thread. When is enough enough?
> I see it the other way round, the elderly gentleman in question seemed to follow Indy around and provoke him, when Indy responded it was turned on him and he was made out to be the problem.
He's been gone for years, and Indy still obsesses over him. Indy also used to regularly post Syntax's wife's picture and other personal details of Syntax's family (before tteh put a stop to it). Indy started harassing Syntax after Syntax had contacted the FBI and alerted them Indy was writing sex stories about his underage students, thus commencing Indy's 25 year long stalking and harassment campaign against Syntax. Syntax retaliated, but Indy instigated it all and kept it all alive for decades (even now, despite Syntax having moved on years ago from the chans).
> No doubt I'll get shit for defending Indy, but Indy has been nothing but kind to me and I think enough is enough.
I seem to remember him throwing you under the bus more than once saying something to the effect of, "at least I contribute and don't only shitpost like green" more than once when threatened with a ban.
> Also Kook doesn't deserve any of this. And I'm not white knighting, Kook has been a good friend to me also over the years.
I agree. Which is why it's so unreal that squeegee gets to come back after all these years and stalk/dox/harass her with impunity. Let's put a fucking end it to it for christ sake. She literally wrote a death threat to tteh in the other thread. When is enough enough?
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,509
@previous (C)
See, none of that is actually true. There were no stories. Syntax made that up. And I am not the one who posted those pics. I only posted Syntax's pic, and only in return for when he actually harassed my family in real life. You are wrong.
See, none of that is actually true. There were no stories. Syntax made that up. And I am not the one who posted those pics. I only posted Syntax's pic, and only in return for when he actually harassed my family in real life. You are wrong.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 59 seconds later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,510
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 43 seconds later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,511
@previous (C)
Again, I posted his pic after he stalked me. And I never did anything else you claim. Those stories never existed. You have been repeating this nonsense for fifteen fucking years. Isn't it time to stop?
Again, I posted his pic after he stalked me. And I never did anything else you claim. Those stories never existed. You have been repeating this nonsense for fifteen fucking years. Isn't it time to stop?
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,512
@previous (B)
You also claim you never demanded child pornography from the very child you demanded it from. So, who are we to believe, a narcissist and confirmed liar or literally anyone else?
You also claim you never demanded child pornography from the very child you demanded it from. So, who are we to believe, a narcissist and confirmed liar or literally anyone else?
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 39 seconds later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,513
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,514
@previous (B)
I haven't even been here 10 years. But we have numerous pieces of evidence and eye witness testimony showing you've been at this for over 25.
I haven't even been here 10 years. But we have numerous pieces of evidence and eye witness testimony showing you've been at this for over 25.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 57 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,515
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,516
Erik !AltRitexT6 joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,517
I'm sorry for insulting you, Green. I think it is born of frustration that I believe your life would be better if you got a job but I don't really know you so maybe I should keep my business to myself.
Having said that... I feel those who insult Kook should be banned because she is a pretty grate poster and I think Matt should just be left alone.
I think we all need to insult fake anon more and Becky should insult everyone again.
Having said that... I feel those who insult Kook should be banned because she is a pretty grate poster and I think Matt should just be left alone.
I think we all need to insult fake anon more and Becky should insult everyone again.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,522
@1,235,514 (C)
> I haven't even been here 10 years.
So how can you claim to know the truth about stuff that happened before you arrived?
You have no idea what you're talking about.
From now on, if you don't have anything good or honest to say, just shut the fuck up.
> I haven't even been here 10 years.
So how can you claim to know the truth about stuff that happened before you arrived?
You have no idea what you're talking about.
From now on, if you don't have anything good or honest to say, just shut the fuck up.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,524
@previous (E)
How can you know anything existed before you were born? How can you know anything happened before your first memory?
> From now on, if you don't have anything good or honest to say, just shut the fuck up.
Maybe take a break from the internet if a simple post gets you so upset.
How can you know anything existed before you were born? How can you know anything happened before your first memory?
> From now on, if you don't have anything good or honest to say, just shut the fuck up.
Maybe take a break from the internet if a simple post gets you so upset.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,526
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 48 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,527
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
You're delusional and all your problems are standing in front of you, right in the mirror.
You're delusional and all your problems are standing in front of you, right in the mirror.
Anonymous C double-posted this 2 years ago, 16 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,528
Anonymous C triple-posted this 2 years ago, 49 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,529
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Stop making legally actionable death threats.
Stop making legally actionable death threats.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,530
Sigh. A simple post. 15 years on continuous harassment and all he sees is the last few words he said.
I'm shunning him. Old school Amish exile.
I'm shunning him. Old school Amish exile.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 8 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,531
@1,235,528 (C)
> Maybe take a break from the internet if a simple post gets you so upset.
Nice self-awareness by the way.
> Maybe take a break from the internet if a simple post gets you so upset.
Nice self-awareness by the way.
Green !!bO/s3MBcD (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,582
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Thanks. I think you're grate too!
Thanks. I think you're grate too!
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,592
@1,235,508 (C)
> Indy started harassing Syntax after Syntax had contacted the FBI and alerted them Indy was writing sex stories about his underage students.
The first pages of the actual Witch's Brew are also of underage sex.
Why does one of our users frequently publish underage sex stories using his real legal name?
Take a look at how the media is covering people affiliated with Epstein. That's how we will all look when the news finds out he's been selling girls from Yunan to massage parlors, and coincidentally had years of documented gangstalking from a publicly available website.
> Indy started harassing Syntax after Syntax had contacted the FBI and alerted them Indy was writing sex stories about his underage students.
The first pages of the actual Witch's Brew are also of underage sex.
Why does one of our users frequently publish underage sex stories using his real legal name?
Take a look at how the media is covering people affiliated with Epstein. That's how we will all look when the news finds out he's been selling girls from Yunan to massage parlors, and coincidentally had years of documented gangstalking from a publicly available website.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,594
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,596
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,602
@previous (G)
A witch trial in the Middle Ages. It is also historically accurate. She's found guilty and burned at the stake, or is she?
A witch trial in the Middle Ages. It is also historically accurate. She's found guilty and burned at the stake, or is she?
Green !!bO/s3MBcD (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 32 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,603
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 32 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,607
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,610
@previous (G)
Oh, you mean when the inquisitor examines her body for the witch's mark, just like they literally did in the Medieval Inquisition AND the Spanish Inquisition? Yes, that. It is hardly "underage sex" lol
Oh, you mean when the inquisitor examines her body for the witch's mark, just like they literally did in the Medieval Inquisition AND the Spanish Inquisition? Yes, that. It is hardly "underage sex" lol
Anonymous B double-posted this 2 years ago, 35 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,612
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 16 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,613
@1,235,610 (B)
The examination is explicit, and involves a sexual assault on the girl. And that's 3 pages in.
The examination is explicit, and involves a sexual assault on the girl. And that's 3 pages in.
Anonymous G double-posted this 2 years ago, 16 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,614
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 32 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,616
@1,235,613 (G)
Yes, just as inquisitors literally did in the Medieval Inquisition. Sounds historically accurate to me. And she was of age in the Middle Ages. You seem really focused on underage sex. Might want to look into that.
Yes, just as inquisitors literally did in the Medieval Inquisition. Sounds historically accurate to me. And she was of age in the Middle Ages. You seem really focused on underage sex. Might want to look into that.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,623
ITS DINOSAUR DYLAN - I HAVE THE DISCORD SCREENIES TO PROVE IT… HES ALIGNED WITH THE AGP DISCORD COOMERS WHO HAVE MANIPULATED CATHERINE INTO STICKING A 12 INCH TRANSLUCENT RED DEVIL COCK DILDO UP HER BUSSY AND MOANING VERY SEXY
squeegee replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,625
@1,235,582 (Green !!bO/s3MBcD)
green, respect. Do not ever think you're not an honorable man. Things have gotten better since you got back too. U carry it with you, and that's who u are.
green, respect. Do not ever think you're not an honorable man. Things have gotten better since you got back too. U carry it with you, and that's who u are.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 31 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,626
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,629
@1,235,616 (B)
It's not your only depiction in your books. Why do you find a way to make all these stories about teens getting defiled?
It's not your only depiction in your books. Why do you find a way to make all these stories about teens getting defiled?
Father Nigger !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,640
Hi Dave!!!!
Green !!bO/s3MBcD (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,643
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 36 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,646
squeegee joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 32 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,647
@1,235,643 (Green !!bO/s3MBcD)
You're right. Green, this is the inflection point. i've let myself sink, and i've never been worse, i chose to. and today is the turning point. i think you're the right person to set the tone. i desperately want to be kind again. it's funny, i registered a domain this morning to host projects before deploying them elsewhere. it's from the phrase l'ennui rabelle, literally "resistant to boredom." But figuratively means "to feel free from stagnant routines." It's that moment when, it's over, and it's behind you. It, meaning "ennui". A listless dissatisfaction arising from a lack of excitement with living. It's more than boredom, its a kind of boredom. It makes one languor in restlessness, and unease. It's difficult to explain. It's just, "An-we..." that how it sounds. Like, Ahnwee. Almost a guttural sigh. Loudly. And rebelle au l'ennui is that butterflies in your stomach, knowing little grin that feels stuck there, tingling skin. Ur living. And now you get to. Not just have to. Or because u want to. Get to. One of the more rare feelings. One of the most memorable. Worth the ennui.
at least that's how i understand the meaning of what's being conveys. it's a freedom from disquieting rancor. and it's fresh new clean air.
but, bastardized into a slightly more american Rebelennui. it's just fun to say.
btw, i didn't know you smoked. J'ai une fag accrochée à ma lèvre autant pour le style que l'ennui rebelle.
only the french can speak so filthy and be saying nothing wrong.
You're right. Green, this is the inflection point. i've let myself sink, and i've never been worse, i chose to. and today is the turning point. i think you're the right person to set the tone. i desperately want to be kind again. it's funny, i registered a domain this morning to host projects before deploying them elsewhere. it's from the phrase l'ennui rabelle, literally "resistant to boredom." But figuratively means "to feel free from stagnant routines." It's that moment when, it's over, and it's behind you. It, meaning "ennui". A listless dissatisfaction arising from a lack of excitement with living. It's more than boredom, its a kind of boredom. It makes one languor in restlessness, and unease. It's difficult to explain. It's just, "An-we..." that how it sounds. Like, Ahnwee. Almost a guttural sigh. Loudly. And rebelle au l'ennui is that butterflies in your stomach, knowing little grin that feels stuck there, tingling skin. Ur living. And now you get to. Not just have to. Or because u want to. Get to. One of the more rare feelings. One of the most memorable. Worth the ennui.
at least that's how i understand the meaning of what's being conveys. it's a freedom from disquieting rancor. and it's fresh new clean air.
but, bastardized into a slightly more american Rebelennui. it's just fun to say.
btw, i didn't know you smoked. J'ai une fag accrochée à ma lèvre autant pour le style que l'ennui rebelle.
only the french can speak so filthy and be saying nothing wrong.
Green !!bO/s3MBcD (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,648
@previous (squeegee)
I smoke very rarely. It's not something worth doing very often. Vaping has come a long way.
I smoke very rarely. It's not something worth doing very often. Vaping has come a long way.
squeegee replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,649
@1,235,646 (K)
i wish he'd post about dinosaurs. i love dinosaurs. jurrassic park was one of the best movies i'd ever seen. lol, i tried to learn unix. but, no, ubuntu. i used ubuntu for years. even had the beryl mod for 3d ui workspaces. when i was a freshman in college people thought it was fucking magic.
i was... not cool. but nobody cared
and oo, it's raining, and i'm going to go out and have a fag in the rain.
i wish he'd post about dinosaurs. i love dinosaurs. jurrassic park was one of the best movies i'd ever seen. lol, i tried to learn unix. but, no, ubuntu. i used ubuntu for years. even had the beryl mod for 3d ui workspaces. when i was a freshman in college people thought it was fucking magic.
i was... not cool. but nobody cared
and oo, it's raining, and i'm going to go out and have a fag in the rain.
squeegee double-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,650
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 19 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,653
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,655
@previous (M)
He has 7 published books that get a lot darker than that, all hyperfixated on underage sexuality, but combined with a new supernatural theme.
He has 7 published books that get a lot darker than that, all hyperfixated on underage sexuality, but combined with a new supernatural theme.
Anonymous M replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,656
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,657
@previous (M)
No, you're referring to two posts of his in one thread.
You're barely scratching the surface, he is putting his name on texts that are more graphic than the ending of It.
No, you're referring to two posts of his in one thread.
You're barely scratching the surface, he is putting his name on texts that are more graphic than the ending of It.
Anonymous M replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,658
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,659
Anonymous M replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,660
@previous (G)
Let me start again.
Is this the incident?
https://tinychan.net/img/1468470857895430.jpg
Please answer "yes" or "no".
Let me start again.
Is this the incident?
https://tinychan.net/img/1468470857895430.jpg
Please answer "yes" or "no".
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 35 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,661
squeegee replied with this 2 years ago, 34 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,667
@1,235,655 (G)
published though. so.... the publisher, amazon i'm assuming sees it differently. i read some of his stuff, and it seems more than borderline racist. but, also, it's at worst satire. i think that just because you have decided to interpret meaning, that this does not mean you have the only say, the final say, or any right to campaign against him as if so righteously that you can excuse any decorum for YOUR behavior. in this regard, you have far exceeded and kind of harm that comes from his books that you aren't having forced down your throat. i have yet to see this mountain of evidence you claim.
show it. the entire volume. its so important to you, then you package it a way that it's meaningful. in his exact words. not yours. YOURS are the added context no one needs to have in order for his words to speak for themselves.
or, drop it. the shtick is tired. so much worse than anything matt actually does. you want to fix something on the board, okay, theres a list of problems people all agree on. it kinda could be fun.
published though. so.... the publisher, amazon i'm assuming sees it differently. i read some of his stuff, and it seems more than borderline racist. but, also, it's at worst satire. i think that just because you have decided to interpret meaning, that this does not mean you have the only say, the final say, or any right to campaign against him as if so righteously that you can excuse any decorum for YOUR behavior. in this regard, you have far exceeded and kind of harm that comes from his books that you aren't having forced down your throat. i have yet to see this mountain of evidence you claim.
show it. the entire volume. its so important to you, then you package it a way that it's meaningful. in his exact words. not yours. YOURS are the added context no one needs to have in order for his words to speak for themselves.
or, drop it. the shtick is tired. so much worse than anything matt actually does. you want to fix something on the board, okay, theres a list of problems people all agree on. it kinda could be fun.
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,670
@previous (squeegee)
Amazon will publish literally anything.
It's lewd scenes about children stopped online for racist tropes, then it's back to the start.
Amazon will publish literally anything.
It's lewd scenes about children stopped online for racist tropes, then it's back to the start.
Jeff Bezos replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,673
@1,235,667 (squeegee)
Amazon publishing is automatic. There's no pre-screening and we only remove stuff if enough people complain, because that could risk our bottom-line.
Amazon publishing is automatic. There's no pre-screening and we only remove stuff if enough people complain, because that could risk our bottom-line.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,675
squeegee replied with this 2 years ago, 36 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,235,676
@1,235,673 (Jeff Bezos)
From Yunan-Fu, three girls so bright,
Dreamt of America, with all their might.
Matt helped them to find work so fair,
In the service industry, they found care.
They thanked Matt with all their heart,
Grateful for his noble part.
Working hard, they loved their trade,
And close with customers, so their bond was made.
Every day their spirits rose,
Filled with joy, no need for woes.
From Yunan-Fu, they came so far,
Thanks to good ol' Matty's star.
Dreamt of America, with all their might.
Matt helped them to find work so fair,
In the service industry, they found care.
They thanked Matt with all their heart,
Grateful for his noble part.
Working hard, they loved their trade,
And close with customers, so their bond was made.
Every day their spirits rose,
Filled with joy, no need for woes.
From Yunan-Fu, they came so far,
Thanks to good ol' Matty's star.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 1 year later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #1,313,037
Tinychan be whack asf yo joined in and replied with this 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 year after the original post[^] [v] #1,313,039
Come on man, what ever happened to the green who buttered bibles and shit in hats??? I still have some of those old pics and vids somewhere.