Topic: You all laughed at me but I told you...
Erik !AltRitexT6 started this discussion 5 years ago #99,906
They ARE coming for your meat.Give it a few years and the anti-meat movment fronted by Greta will be shaming you to cut back and quit meat and the sheeple will just nod along.
Erik !AltRitexT6 (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 34 seconds later[^] [v] #1,126,928
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,933
Hell yeah. I don't know who "they" are, or why writing an op-ed is them "coming for your meat" but this is totally correct.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,935
The alt-right: The New York Times is fake news.
Also the alt-right: This opinion piece in the New York Times is the gospel truth.
Also the alt-right: This opinion piece in the New York Times is the gospel truth.
Erik !AltRitexT6 (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 30 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,936
@1,126,933 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Don't you see how this works? they start writing about it, marching about it and reporting about it then companies like supermarkets reduce the amount of meet you can buy because celebs instergramed about it with a picture of Greta. It snowballs just like every other social justice hoax/fad. If you enjoy a phat steak, mark my works they will make it harder for you to enjoy and socially unacceptail to talk about.
Don't you see how this works? they start writing about it, marching about it and reporting about it then companies like supermarkets reduce the amount of meet you can buy because celebs instergramed about it with a picture of Greta. It snowballs just like every other social justice hoax/fad. If you enjoy a phat steak, mark my works they will make it harder for you to enjoy and socially unacceptail to talk about.
Erik !AltRitexT6 (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,938
@1,126,935 (C)
It's fake news because eating meat has nothing to do what what they say but it's how they start getting people used to the idea that meat is bad.
It's fake news because eating meat has nothing to do what what they say but it's how they start getting people used to the idea that meat is bad.
Erik !AltRitexT6 (OP) triple-posted this 5 years ago, 44 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,939
If you don't eat meat this could be you and while you don't reproduce you'll be replaced.Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 55 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,940
Erik !AltRitexT6 (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,941
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
The anti-meat brigade and liberal elites who will just go along with this to fit in.
The anti-meat brigade and liberal elites who will just go along with this to fit in.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 56 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,942
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,944
@1,126,941 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
Who, specifically, is the "anti-meat" brigade? Do you mean environmental activists? Vegan/vegetarian activists? There just really are not many of those around. This is the kind of vague fearmongering that makes no sense at all.
Who, specifically, is the "anti-meat" brigade? Do you mean environmental activists? Vegan/vegetarian activists? There just really are not many of those around. This is the kind of vague fearmongering that makes no sense at all.
Erik !AltRitexT6 (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,945
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)They are around and did you know Greta Thungberg is now a CNN "expert" on the coronavirus? Why? Fuck knows. They'll put her in the middle of the stop light and she'll tell you to stop eating meat then everyone will nod along and companies will bend in her favour.
Erik !AltRitexT6 (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,948
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,950
@1,126,945 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
> They are around and did you know Greta Thungberg is now a CNN "expert" on the coronavirus? Why? Fuck knows. They'll put her in the middle of the stop light and she'll tell you to stop eating meat then everyone will nod along and companies will bend in her favour.
You're like a parody of one of those gullible right-wing morons who gets freaked out over the latest bit of fearporn drip-fed to you by the Daily Mail. Then I remember that you actually ARE one of those gullible right-wing morons.
> They are around and did you know Greta Thungberg is now a CNN "expert" on the coronavirus? Why? Fuck knows. They'll put her in the middle of the stop light and she'll tell you to stop eating meat then everyone will nod along and companies will bend in her favour.
You're like a parody of one of those gullible right-wing morons who gets freaked out over the latest bit of fearporn drip-fed to you by the Daily Mail. Then I remember that you actually ARE one of those gullible right-wing morons.
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 53 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,951
you seem overly concerned with the silly writings and bleatings found in mass media
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,955
@1,126,945 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
My favorite one of these was the one where there were two editorials side by side (by the same author in the same paper). One was about how Melania Trump's white suit signified nazis, KKK, white supremacy, etc, and the other one was about how Hillary Clinton's white suite was totally awesome made her look presidential ??
My favorite one of these was the one where there were two editorials side by side (by the same author in the same paper). One was about how Melania Trump's white suit signified nazis, KKK, white supremacy, etc, and the other one was about how Hillary Clinton's white suite was totally awesome made her look presidential ??
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,956
@1,126,945 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
What does any of that have to do with even beginning to explain your point? It's just a collection of unorganized complaints about nothing in particular. No one cares what some 16 year old Swedish girl or whatever thinks. There is no meaningful money or force behind that. You know who is going to determine whether people eat meat or not? Billion dollar agribusiness corporations and the lobbyists/politicians in their corner. You sort of of grasp that there are forces behind the scenes working to shape policy but you just focus on whatever shiny object the Daily Mail, Breitbart, et al. dangle in front of you. If they are out in public stating their point of view they are largely not actually that influential in actually pushing forward policy change, just as a general rule of thumb.
What does any of that have to do with even beginning to explain your point? It's just a collection of unorganized complaints about nothing in particular. No one cares what some 16 year old Swedish girl or whatever thinks. There is no meaningful money or force behind that. You know who is going to determine whether people eat meat or not? Billion dollar agribusiness corporations and the lobbyists/politicians in their corner. You sort of of grasp that there are forces behind the scenes working to shape policy but you just focus on whatever shiny object the Daily Mail, Breitbart, et al. dangle in front of you. If they are out in public stating their point of view they are largely not actually that influential in actually pushing forward policy change, just as a general rule of thumb.
(Edited 43 seconds later.)
Erik !AltRitexT6 (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 26 seconds later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,957
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,958
Ok this is just absurd. For the record, animal farming is a huge contributor to climate change.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,962
@1,126,955 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
> My favorite one of these was the one where there were two editorials side by side (by the same author in the same paper). One was about how Melania Trump's white suit signified nazis, KKK, white supremacy, etc, and the other one was about how Hillary Clinton's white suite was totally awesome made her look presidential ??
That sounds curious. Which edition of the paper has that? I'm trying to rule out some bullshit fakery in case someone just slapped some shit together to rile people up.
> My favorite one of these was the one where there were two editorials side by side (by the same author in the same paper). One was about how Melania Trump's white suit signified nazis, KKK, white supremacy, etc, and the other one was about how Hillary Clinton's white suite was totally awesome made her look presidential ??
That sounds curious. Which edition of the paper has that? I'm trying to rule out some bullshit fakery in case someone just slapped some shit together to rile people up.
Anonymous C replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,963
16bitch !/nxYguuEzA joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,968
@1,126,945 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
bruh
You realize Greta is talking about cutting down on meat because that would greatly help prevent climate change, not because she has some "agenda", right? She's some random 17 year old girl, she doesn't have an agenda, she isn't in on some massive anti-meat conspiracy. She isn't even going to have much of an effect - do you really think this random teenage girl will have any influence on global policy when there are thousands of lobbyists working on each side? It's honestly delusional, calm down and finish your steak.
bruh
You realize Greta is talking about cutting down on meat because that would greatly help prevent climate change, not because she has some "agenda", right? She's some random 17 year old girl, she doesn't have an agenda, she isn't in on some massive anti-meat conspiracy. She isn't even going to have much of an effect - do you really think this random teenage girl will have any influence on global policy when there are thousands of lobbyists working on each side? It's honestly delusional, calm down and finish your steak.
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 5 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,973
@1,126,962 (Sheila LaBoof)
> That sounds curious. Which edition of the paper has that? I'm trying to rule out some bullshit fakery in case someone just slapped some shit together to rile people up.
I don't have the original image anymore (lost in the great hard drive crash of '19) but here are the two articles, both by Elizabeth Wellington in the Philadelphia Enquirer:
https://www.inquirer.com/philly/columnists/elizabeth_wellington/DNC_Fashion_Hillary_Clinton_accepts_the_democratic_nomination_confidently_in_all_white_.html
DNC Fashion: Hillary Clinton looked presidential in an all-white pantsuit
Posted: July 28, 2016 - 11:38 PM
https://www.inquirer.com/philly/living/style/Melania-Trump-RNC-fashion-A-scary-statement.html
Melania Trump's RNC fashion: A scary statement
by Elizabeth Wellington, Posted: July 19, 2016
> That sounds curious. Which edition of the paper has that? I'm trying to rule out some bullshit fakery in case someone just slapped some shit together to rile people up.
I don't have the original image anymore (lost in the great hard drive crash of '19) but here are the two articles, both by Elizabeth Wellington in the Philadelphia Enquirer:
https://www.inquirer.com/philly/columnists/elizabeth_wellington/DNC_Fashion_Hillary_Clinton_accepts_the_democratic_nomination_confidently_in_all_white_.html
DNC Fashion: Hillary Clinton looked presidential in an all-white pantsuit
Posted: July 28, 2016 - 11:38 PM
https://www.inquirer.com/philly/living/style/Melania-Trump-RNC-fashion-A-scary-statement.html
Melania Trump's RNC fashion: A scary statement
by Elizabeth Wellington, Posted: July 19, 2016
dw joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,975
Good
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 57 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,991
Just like when Obama came for Americans' guns and declared Martian Law after Jade Helm!
Nobody is going to confiscate your meat or make you eat insects. How environmental concerns about meat became another right-wing "they're gon' tekk our ..." conspiracy theory for braindead morons is beyond me.
Nobody is going to confiscate your meat or make you eat insects. How environmental concerns about meat became another right-wing "they're gon' tekk our ..." conspiracy theory for braindead morons is beyond me.
tteh !MemesToDNA double-posted this 5 years ago, 54 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,992
However I do enjoy the abject terror a 16-year-old Swedish girl inspires in these people. ?
Not that obsession with little children is anything new for alt-right folk, ofc.
Not that obsession with little children is anything new for alt-right folk, ofc.
(Edited 46 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,993
@1,126,973 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
So the same color cannot symbolize two different things? ???
Funny how Republicans are happy when states go Red but were mad when China and Vietnam did.
So the same color cannot symbolize two different things? ???
Funny how Republicans are happy when states go Red but were mad when China and Vietnam did.
Svetlana joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,995
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,126,996
Will never happen.
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,000
@1,126,993 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
The "red state" thing didn't catch on until the 2000 election. Communism was established in North Vietnam and China in 1945 and 1949, respectively. A color changing in political significance over the course of 50 years is entirely different from the color white meaning entirely different things in two articles written by the same person within 9 days of each other.
The "red state" thing didn't catch on until the 2000 election. Communism was established in North Vietnam and China in 1945 and 1949, respectively. A color changing in political significance over the course of 50 years is entirely different from the color white meaning entirely different things in two articles written by the same person within 9 days of each other.
Svetnia replied with this 5 years ago, 41 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,001
16bitch !/nxYguuEzA replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,002
@1,127,000 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
> arguing about the political significance of colors
> arguing about the political significance of colors
(Edited 31 seconds later.)
Svetlana replied with this 5 years ago, 25 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,003
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 5 years ago, 23 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,004
Svetnia replied with this 5 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,005
@1,127,003 (Svetlana)
That is exactly what I be expecting of Paki whore girl to say. Svet be no of loving dirty Paki like you.
That is exactly what I be expecting of Paki whore girl to say. Svet be no of loving dirty Paki like you.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,007
@1,127,000 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
I mean the same color can symbolize the same thing at exactly the same time. The suffragettes wore white in 1920. The Klan wore white in 1920. They did not have the same political goals. It's totally possible for the same color to symbolize two different things if worn by two different people in the same era. I don't think the articles are good, and it's very clearly just the author projecting her own personal opinion of these two women onto their clothing choices, but it's not inherently contradictory.
I mean the same color can symbolize the same thing at exactly the same time. The suffragettes wore white in 1920. The Klan wore white in 1920. They did not have the same political goals. It's totally possible for the same color to symbolize two different things if worn by two different people in the same era. I don't think the articles are good, and it's very clearly just the author projecting her own personal opinion of these two women onto their clothing choices, but it's not inherently contradictory.
16bitch !/nxYguuEzA replied with this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,008
Anonymous D replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,009
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,010
Green !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,027
I'm going vegetarian tomorrow. I've only got tinned meat anyway, which doesn't go off. Could just keep it in the cupboard or give it to a food bank. Went vegetarian for 3 months last year, I'll see if I can beat that.
Erik !jzYkdX7lIw joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 10 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,030
@previous (Green !StaYqkzUPc)
Okay but if you go vegi try to avoid doing what other vegies do and fill up on carbs because you'll get get fat, lose muscle mass and become gay.
Okay but if you go vegi try to avoid doing what other vegies do and fill up on carbs because you'll get get fat, lose muscle mass and become gay.
Green !StaYqkzUPc replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,032
@previous (Erik !jzYkdX7lIw)
I started losing weight since I've been cutting out eggs/meat and eating more carbs ??
I started losing weight since I've been cutting out eggs/meat and eating more carbs ??
Green !StaYqkzUPc double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,033
Erik !jzYkdX7lIw replied with this 5 years ago, 27 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,042
@1,127,032 (Green !StaYqkzUPc)
That's not how it works. You've been doing something else or you have cancer
That's not how it works. You've been doing something else or you have cancer
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,046
Methane provides a great environmental benefit, producing more heat and light energy by mass than other hydrocarbon, or fossil fuel, including coal and gasoline refined from oil, while producing significantly less carbon dioxide and other pollutants that contribute to smog and unhealthy air.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 5 years ago, 3 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,186
@1,126,973 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
OK, I wondered a bit and thought, maybe's she's black. Many blacks are sensitive to things like some of the racist rants of louts who rallied for Trump at the election, because blacks have family history of getting murdered by KKK and whatnot. So I look her up. Yeah, she's black. Also, she's not a news columnist. She writes about fashion stuff. Why are you fussy that a black lady who writes about fashion got freaked out in 2016 by the fucked up white nationalist/supremacist people we saw that year (and in the years since)?
https://www.inquirer.com/author/wellington_elizabeth/
OK, I wondered a bit and thought, maybe's she's black. Many blacks are sensitive to things like some of the racist rants of louts who rallied for Trump at the election, because blacks have family history of getting murdered by KKK and whatnot. So I look her up. Yeah, she's black. Also, she's not a news columnist. She writes about fashion stuff. Why are you fussy that a black lady who writes about fashion got freaked out in 2016 by the fucked up white nationalist/supremacist people we saw that year (and in the years since)?
https://www.inquirer.com/author/wellington_elizabeth/
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,216
@1,127,046 (O)
Not when the methane is expelled into the air as a gas. Which is how it's produced in agriculture. You can't be serious, this is like fourth-grade stuff.
Not when the methane is expelled into the air as a gas. Which is how it's produced in agriculture. You can't be serious, this is like fourth-grade stuff.
Green !StaYqkzUPc replied with this 5 years ago, 7 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,127,312
@1,127,042 (Erik !jzYkdX7lIw)
Or maybe you've been listening to too much anti-cancer propaganda. I really hope they ban meat ?
Or maybe you've been listening to too much anti-cancer propaganda. I really hope they ban meat ?