Topic: We need more stimulus checks?
Anonymous A started this discussion 5 years ago #99,569
I absolutely do feel we need another round of assistance. But why in the fuck does the House decide that kids 16 and 17 years old should get the $2000 each month along with the adults, in the proposed Bill? That's totally stupid.(Edited 52 seconds later.)
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,123,531
You have this weird tendency to say you deserve a stimulus check but nobody else does. I don't get it. If it was a "pure" coronavirus stimulus check, like you've said you wanted, you wouldn't get one because you have been unemployed since before the pandemic.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,536
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
What does a damned 16 year old need 2000 dollars a month for?
Please tell us.
What does a damned 16 year old need 2000 dollars a month for?
Please tell us.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 49 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,537
@1,123,531 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
> You have this weird tendency to say you deserve a stimulus check but nobody else does. I don't get it. If it was a "pure" coronavirus stimulus check, like you've said you wanted, you wouldn't get one because you have been unemployed since before the pandemic.
> You have this weird tendency to say you deserve a stimulus check but nobody else does. I don't get it. If it was a "pure" coronavirus stimulus check, like you've said you wanted, you wouldn't get one because you have been unemployed since before the pandemic.
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,538
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,540
@previous (A)
You complain that Democrats keep adding in provisions so more people will get stimulus checks. People who you don't think deserve the checks. Like those University students who are now without their summer jobs and internships.
You complain that Democrats keep adding in provisions so more people will get stimulus checks. People who you don't think deserve the checks. Like those University students who are now without their summer jobs and internships.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,541
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,543
@1,123,540 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
And no...what I have bitched about is them adding numerous items that they want approved of...that have absolutely nothing to do with coronavirus relief.
And no...what I have bitched about is them adding numerous items that they want approved of...that have absolutely nothing to do with coronavirus relief.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,548
@previous (A)
I see. So you have a separate issue with university students who have lost their lined-up summer jobs and internships receiving stimulus checks. What items have they added to the coronavirus relief bills which you disapprove of?
I see. So you have a separate issue with university students who have lost their lined-up summer jobs and internships receiving stimulus checks. What items have they added to the coronavirus relief bills which you disapprove of?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,552
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
SIXTEEN AND SEVENTEEN YEAR OLDS are not
university students who have lost their lined-up summer jobs and internships
SIXTEEN AND SEVENTEEN YEAR OLDS are not
university students who have lost their lined-up summer jobs and internships
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,556
@1,123,548 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
This thread is about SIXTEEN AND SEVENTEEN YEAR OLDS somehow being deserving 2000 dollars a month in coronavirus stimulus.
What is your perspective on that?
This thread is about SIXTEEN AND SEVENTEEN YEAR OLDS somehow being deserving 2000 dollars a month in coronavirus stimulus.
What is your perspective on that?
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 19 seconds later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,557
@1,123,552 (A)
I didn't say they were. I'm referring to a previous thread you made about those university students.
I didn't say they were. I'm referring to a previous thread you made about those university students.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 29 seconds later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,559
Who cares if 16 year olds get it or not? Why would that matter?
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 29 seconds later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,562
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 9 seconds later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,563
@1,123,559 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Bert, like most Republicans, thinks that only he deserves socialist money, and anyone else who gets it is lazy.
Bert, like most Republicans, thinks that only he deserves socialist money, and anyone else who gets it is lazy.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 13 seconds later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,564
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 6 seconds later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,565
@1,123,556 (A)
I don't have a strong feeling either way about it.
Some families do depend on their 16- and 17- year olds bringing in income. Other 16- and 17-year olds do not live with their families. Either way, you receive government money and don't pay taxes so it doesn't affect you if they receive it.
I don't have a strong feeling either way about it.
Some families do depend on their 16- and 17- year olds bringing in income. Other 16- and 17-year olds do not live with their families. Either way, you receive government money and don't pay taxes so it doesn't affect you if they receive it.
Stinky Pete Peyote joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 30 seconds later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,567
Bert needs $2,000.00 so he can buy more mulch from Home Depot. Bert needs clean mulch for him to pee and poo on.
dreamworks joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,570
Why do you get it if you earn 129000$ a year
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Stinky Pete Peyote replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,572
dreamworks replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,573
Stinky Pete Peyote replied with this 5 years ago, 30 seconds later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,574
dreamworks replied with this 5 years ago, 10 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,576
@previous (Stinky Pete Peyote)
wouldn't it stimulate it more if you gave it to people making regular ppl salaries
wouldn't it stimulate it more if you gave it to people making regular ppl salaries
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,579
@1,123,565 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
> Some families do depend on their 16- and 17- year olds bringing in income. Other 16- and 17-year olds do not live with their families.
Maybe a small percentage of them are
We are talking millions of 16 and 17 year olds potentially getting $2000 a month for 3-6 months.
I think its foolish to give millions of families with two parents and three kids who live at home who are in high school $8,000 a month for six months in stim checks...and then give a married couple $4000 a month for 6 months with no children.
Your opinion?
$12,000 for the two parents a month PLUS-
SIX THOUSAND a month extra for THREE 16 year old kids...times 6 months???
THIRTY SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR THE THREE 16 YEAR OLDS???
That's 48,000 THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR SIX MONTHS.
Are you crazy
> Some families do depend on their 16- and 17- year olds bringing in income. Other 16- and 17-year olds do not live with their families.
Maybe a small percentage of them are
We are talking millions of 16 and 17 year olds potentially getting $2000 a month for 3-6 months.
I think its foolish to give millions of families with two parents and three kids who live at home who are in high school $8,000 a month for six months in stim checks...and then give a married couple $4000 a month for 6 months with no children.
Your opinion?
$12,000 for the two parents a month PLUS-
SIX THOUSAND a month extra for THREE 16 year old kids...times 6 months???
THIRTY SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR THE THREE 16 YEAR OLDS???
That's 48,000 THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR SIX MONTHS.
Are you crazy
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,580
@previous (A)
How can someone have three 16 year old kids? Triplets are...very uncommon.
How can someone have three 16 year old kids? Triplets are...very uncommon.
(Edited 6 seconds later.)
dreamworks replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,581
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 2 seconds later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,582
Why should you get a check for Bert? You haven't paid taxes in over 6 months.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 22 seconds later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,583
@1,123,579 (A)
Look, plenty of people will argue that it's absurd for you to get a stimulus check because you didn't lose your job to Covid. You were already unemployed. I find it bizarre that you, who are in a tenuously defensible position when it comes to receiving stim checks, attack others who are similarly in tenuously defensible positions for receiving stim checks.
Look, plenty of people will argue that it's absurd for you to get a stimulus check because you didn't lose your job to Covid. You were already unemployed. I find it bizarre that you, who are in a tenuously defensible position when it comes to receiving stim checks, attack others who are similarly in tenuously defensible positions for receiving stim checks.
Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 14 seconds later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,584
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,585
48,000 for 6 months for millions of families that usual income might be 38,000 a year.
Times millions of families.
WHAT??
THIS kind of idiocy is insane as fuck.
Times millions of families.
WHAT??
THIS kind of idiocy is insane as fuck.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,586
The more sensible route would be three more $1200 checks (one per month) with the extra 500 per child like the first stimulus.
That would be rational and just.
That would be rational and just.
(Edited 28 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,589
AmIrite?
Anonymous A (OP) quadruple-posted this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,590
@1,123,583 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
And you have worked how many weeks in the last year?
Two or three?
And you have worked how many weeks in the last year?
Two or three?
Anonymous A (OP) quintuple-posted this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,592
Ok...its not that large of a number. My ranting was not as warranted as I figured. Ooops.I mean 7 million is a lot...but I imagine the number would have been like 50 million or more.
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 42 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,597
This is a genuine question: are most Americans even the slightest bit concerned by this...
https://usdebtclock.org/
...or do they figure it's something for the next generation to worry about?
https://usdebtclock.org/
...or do they figure it's something for the next generation to worry about?
Anonymous H replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,599
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
How are we supposed to worry about it? The government does what they want, regardless of what the people have to say about it.
Besides, all of history has probably done shit that would make the next generation worry about it.
How are we supposed to worry about it? The government does what they want, regardless of what the people have to say about it.
Besides, all of history has probably done shit that would make the next generation worry about it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,600
Stinky Pete Peyote replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,602
@1,123,597 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> This is a genuine question: are most Americans even the slightest bit concerned by this...
>
> https://usdebtclock.org/
>
> ...or do they figure it's something for the next generation to worry about?
Nope, it’s never going to be an issue ever. The national debt is meaningless. As long as currency is fiat and bonds continue to get issued and paid out nothing bad will ever happen because of it.
> This is a genuine question: are most Americans even the slightest bit concerned by this...
>
> https://usdebtclock.org/
>
> ...or do they figure it's something for the next generation to worry about?
Nope, it’s never going to be an issue ever. The national debt is meaningless. As long as currency is fiat and bonds continue to get issued and paid out nothing bad will ever happen because of it.
Stinky Pete Peyote double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,604
@1,123,576 (dreamworks)
Stimulus checks are meant to stimulate the economy not be a safety blanket. The reasoning behind stimulus checks isn’t to provide social welfare.
Stimulus checks are meant to stimulate the economy not be a safety blanket. The reasoning behind stimulus checks isn’t to provide social welfare.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,606
@previous (Stinky Pete Peyote)
It stimulated the fuck out of me when the mods got rid of The wall of text lying Stalker.
It stimulated the fuck out of me when the mods got rid of The wall of text lying Stalker.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 24 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,608
@1,123,590 (A)
Last year I worked from May (the end of the spring semester) til the construction winter break in mid-December with just a couple weeks off between projects. How many weeks did you work last year?
Last year I worked from May (the end of the spring semester) til the construction winter break in mid-December with just a couple weeks off between projects. How many weeks did you work last year?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,614
dreamworks replied with this 5 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,621
@1,123,590 (A)
I don't think that's correct but even if it is she isn't complaining about how people are receiving financial aid during a crisis so bit moot
I don't think that's correct but even if it is she isn't complaining about how people are receiving financial aid during a crisis so bit moot
dreamworks double-posted this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,622
@1,123,604 (Stinky Pete Peyote)
right so you think someone who makes a 100k a year was going to skip replacing their dishwasher or whatever because they don't get financial aid? they are perfectly capable of stimulating the economy themselves. unlike the people who lost their jobs
right so you think someone who makes a 100k a year was going to skip replacing their dishwasher or whatever because they don't get financial aid? they are perfectly capable of stimulating the economy themselves. unlike the people who lost their jobs
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,623
@1,123,614 (A)
Right. And you're attacking me on the basis that I didn't work enough last year? Get real.
Right. And you're attacking me on the basis that I didn't work enough last year? Get real.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 32 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,639
@OP
> We need more stimulus checks?
Do we need more stimulus checks?
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
> And you're attacking me on the basis that I didn't work enough last year?
Is he attacking you on the basis that you didn’t work enough last year?
> We need more stimulus checks?
Do we need more stimulus checks?
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
> And you're attacking me on the basis that I didn't work enough last year?
Is he attacking you on the basis that you didn’t work enough last year?
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 28 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,647
@previous (J)
I get the impression you're unfamiliar with interrogative English sentences, Dennis. Like, stuck in the "my English teacher said sentences can't end with a preposition!!1one" phase.
I get the impression you're unfamiliar with interrogative English sentences, Dennis. Like, stuck in the "my English teacher said sentences can't end with a preposition!!1one" phase.
(Edited 41 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 33 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,653
@1,123,623 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Isnt that almost the only goddamn thing you say about me, bitch?
That's all you goddamn say!!!
Oh you cant hold a job bert... I make more money than you bert..
I'd smack you across the top of your head so damn hard you'd see stars for a week I get so tired of that shit.
Are you such a total CUNT that's how you judge people by how much fucking money they have?? That's retarded as fuck!!
Fuck you for that shit!!!
How about having goddamn life experience to handle and maintaining A to fucking Z and not have to pay someone to do it? You should fucking respect that I am a fucking person who has been around a long time and had DOZENS of stressful situations that I have managed to get through.
I have done more of EVERYTHING than you have. I have lost more loved people than you I have fed more animals than you I have made more money I have paid more taxes I have fucked more people I have been sick more I have done more drugs I have done EVERYTHING you have done dozens of times more than you.
Yet you keep downing me and saying ahit about how you can make a fuckinh higher wage than me and I'm broke and that shit.
I dont deserve to be talked about like that from you and I resent it...do you get that? It makes me angry. Im fucking tired of it.
I have said nice things to you and I have said supportive things to you and all you can do is ridicule me and say insults. I'm fucking tired of it.
Isnt that almost the only goddamn thing you say about me, bitch?
That's all you goddamn say!!!
Oh you cant hold a job bert... I make more money than you bert..
I'd smack you across the top of your head so damn hard you'd see stars for a week I get so tired of that shit.
Are you such a total CUNT that's how you judge people by how much fucking money they have?? That's retarded as fuck!!
Fuck you for that shit!!!
How about having goddamn life experience to handle and maintaining A to fucking Z and not have to pay someone to do it? You should fucking respect that I am a fucking person who has been around a long time and had DOZENS of stressful situations that I have managed to get through.
I have done more of EVERYTHING than you have. I have lost more loved people than you I have fed more animals than you I have made more money I have paid more taxes I have fucked more people I have been sick more I have done more drugs I have done EVERYTHING you have done dozens of times more than you.
Yet you keep downing me and saying ahit about how you can make a fuckinh higher wage than me and I'm broke and that shit.
I dont deserve to be talked about like that from you and I resent it...do you get that? It makes me angry. Im fucking tired of it.
I have said nice things to you and I have said supportive things to you and all you can do is ridicule me and say insults. I'm fucking tired of it.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,654
@previous (A)
You first brought up how much either of us had worked in the last year. Not me. And you're mad that you get burned by it.
You first brought up how much either of us had worked in the last year. Not me. And you're mad that you get burned by it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,659
@1,123,623 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I want you to know I will talk respectfully from now on and try to be nice and by God I respect the same back.
I'm tired of this damned bickering I'm so damn tired of it. Please think about this.
You cause me too damn much stress. Maybe you think its deserved but I'm fucking tired of it.
Let's try and get along.
I want you to know I will talk respectfully from now on and try to be nice and by God I respect the same back.
I'm tired of this damned bickering I'm so damn tired of it. Please think about this.
You cause me too damn much stress. Maybe you think its deserved but I'm fucking tired of it.
Let's try and get along.
Stinky Pete Peyote replied with this 5 years ago, 17 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,660
Anonymous I replied with this 5 years ago, 54 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,661
@1,123,653 (A)
> I'd smack you across the top of your head so damn hard you'd see stars for a week I get so tired of that shit.
A man should never be violent towards a woman. Don't you know that?
> I'd smack you across the top of your head so damn hard you'd see stars for a week I get so tired of that shit.
A man should never be violent towards a woman. Don't you know that?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 22 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,662
@1,123,654 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
You dont have to say all the insulting things that come into your head...dont you get that?
Quit being hateful.
You dont have to say all the insulting things that come into your head...dont you get that?
Quit being hateful.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,663
@1,123,661 (I)
Well damnit I would not ever try to hurt her but sometimes when you poke a bear with a sharp stick all day long the bear might smack at you once to let you know its had way too much abuse.
Well damnit I would not ever try to hurt her but sometimes when you poke a bear with a sharp stick all day long the bear might smack at you once to let you know its had way too much abuse.
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,664
@previous (A)
> Well damnit I would not ever try to hurt her but sometimes when you poke a bear with a sharp stick all day long the bear might smack at you once to let you know its had way too much abuse.
So you'd never be violent towards a woman except when you lose your temper?
> Well damnit I would not ever try to hurt her but sometimes when you poke a bear with a sharp stick all day long the bear might smack at you once to let you know its had way too much abuse.
So you'd never be violent towards a woman except when you lose your temper?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 37 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,665
I regret blowing up but enough is enough.
I will back this shit up with good behaviour on my part I promise.
Theirs no need to fight all the time on here and a fucking pancake has two sides.
I will back this shit up with good behaviour on my part I promise.
Theirs no need to fight all the time on here and a fucking pancake has two sides.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,666
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 13 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,667
Triptych, why bully bert?
Why do you bully bert?
Why do you bully bert?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,668
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,669
Good grief..I'm just saying.
Anonymous I replied with this 5 years ago, 19 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,670
@1,123,665 (A)
> I regret blowing up but enough is enough.
> I will back this shit up with good behaviour on my part I promise.
It's just that you often promise to stop threatening violence against her and then within a couple of days you're back to threatening to beat her up or rape her.
> I regret blowing up but enough is enough.
> I will back this shit up with good behaviour on my part I promise.
It's just that you often promise to stop threatening violence against her and then within a couple of days you're back to threatening to beat her up or rape her.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,671
See: Now she'll say something as a reply to make me look bad again.
She cant help it. She has been riding on the 'let's hate on Bert bandwagon' for so long she thinks that's her role.
I dont understand it.
That's not what this board should be about.
She cant help it. She has been riding on the 'let's hate on Bert bandwagon' for so long she thinks that's her role.
I dont understand it.
That's not what this board should be about.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,672
@1,123,670 (I)
No one asked you to say a damn thing. If you want to stir shit get a wooden spoon and go crap in your toilet.
No one asked you to say a damn thing. If you want to stir shit get a wooden spoon and go crap in your toilet.
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,676
I know I am guilty of some bad behaviour but I want this thing to get better not worse.
Animosity is a poison. Let's shed ourselves of that. It can only benefit us all.
Animosity is a poison. Let's shed ourselves of that. It can only benefit us all.
Anonymous A (OP) quadruple-posted this 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,678
A lot of the shit is my fault but two wrongs dont make a right.
Anonymous A (OP) quintuple-posted this 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,679
@1,123,654 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I dont feel like I should called you a bitch and a cunt. I was just throwing a stupid fit.
I dont feel like I should called you a bitch and a cunt. I was just throwing a stupid fit.
Anonymous L replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,681
Anonymous I replied with this 5 years ago, 18 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,686
@1,123,679 (A)
> I dont feel like I should called you a bitch and a cunt. I was just throwing a stupid fit.
Aaaaaand here comes the apology phase. Abusive wife-beater strategy 101.
> I dont feel like I should called you a bitch and a cunt. I was just throwing a stupid fit.
Aaaaaand here comes the apology phase. Abusive wife-beater strategy 101.
Anonymous I double-posted this 5 years ago, 53 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,687
@1,123,672 (A)
> No one asked you to say a damn thing.
Internet forums don't work the way you seem to think they work. People say what they want to say and when they want to say it. Get used to it.
> No one asked you to say a damn thing.
Internet forums don't work the way you seem to think they work. People say what they want to say and when they want to say it. Get used to it.
Anonymous J replied with this 5 years ago, 21 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,688
@1,123,647 (K)
I get the impression that people are confusing the question mark with a period or exclamation point.
I get the impression that people are confusing the question mark with a period or exclamation point.
Anonymous K replied with this 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,691
Anonymous J replied with this 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,695
Anonymous K replied with this 5 years ago, 55 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,696
Anonymous J replied with this 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,697
Anonymous K replied with this 5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,698
@previous (J)
I bet you have the most adorable, prescriptive idea of English. Oh, I just want to pinch your little cheeks! :33
I bet you have the most adorable, prescriptive idea of English. Oh, I just want to pinch your little cheeks! :33
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,699
@1,123,678 (A)
What "wrong" did I commit in this thread? I literally just asked you the exact same question you asked me in an attempt to make me look bad and I pointed it out. And then you blew up.
What "wrong" did I commit in this thread? I literally just asked you the exact same question you asked me in an attempt to make me look bad and I pointed it out. And then you blew up.
Anonymous J replied with this 5 years ago, 57 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,700
@1,123,698 (K)
The correct way to say that is:
The correct way to say that is:
I bet you have the most adorable, prescriptive idea of English? Oh? I just want to pinch your little cheeks? ??
Anonymous H replied with this 5 years ago, 25 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,703
Yes!!! Bert has transformed into his BERTRAGE! I love when that happens!
Anonymous J replied with this 5 years ago, 17 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,951
Blom joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,123,969
The point of a stimulus cheque is that people waddle out to the stores and buy things with it