Topic: Boris Johnson thanks the 2 nurses who saved his life. Both are foreigners. One is an EU worker.
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #98,586
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-52262012
Good thing for leader-of-the-Brexit-movement Boris Johnson that his plan to send the Pakis back to Croatia was delayed as long as it was.
Good thing for leader-of-the-Brexit-movement Boris Johnson that his plan to send the Pakis back to Croatia was delayed as long as it was.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 32 minutes later[^] [v] #1,112,391
They are Heros, for doing their jobs.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,441
@OP
What is your point? Do you still think Brexit was all about getting rid of foreigners and had nothing to do with exiting the EU?
What is your point? Do you still think Brexit was all about getting rid of foreigners and had nothing to do with exiting the EU?
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 26 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,446
@previous (C)
Fake Newsers only believe what their televisions tell them. They have strange opinions compared to normal people
Fake Newsers only believe what their televisions tell them. They have strange opinions compared to normal people
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 54 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,465
@1,112,391 (B)
> They are Heros, for doing their jobs.
Military do their jobs. Right-winger response: "They're heroes!"
Nurses do their jobs. Right-winger response: "So what, it's their job"
> They are Heros, for doing their jobs.
Military do their jobs. Right-winger response: "They're heroes!"
Nurses do their jobs. Right-winger response: "So what, it's their job"
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,466
@1,112,441 (C)
> What is your point?
That the xenophobic "they're taking our jobs!" sloganeering employed by the Brexit crowd falls silent when those foreign workers are saving their lives.
> What is your point?
That the xenophobic "they're taking our jobs!" sloganeering employed by the Brexit crowd falls silent when those foreign workers are saving their lives.
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,470
@1,112,446 (D)> Fake Newsers only believe what their televisions tell them. They have strange opinions compared to normal people
Fake News eh? You mean like when Nigel Farage used this image of migrants crossing the Croatia-Slovenia border in 2015 (with the only prominent white person in the photograph obscured by a box of text no less) and told his idiot supporters that it was people trying to get into Britain via Calais?
But yeah, nothing about Brexit was to do with xenophobia or scare-mongering about foreigners.
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,472
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,474
@previous (D)
> That photo is fake and those people aren't illegally crossing a border?
What on earth are you talking about? The photo is not fake. Farage was even reported to the police over its use:
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/16/nigel-farage-defends-ukip-breaking-point-poster-queue-of-migrants
> That photo is fake and those people aren't illegally crossing a border?
What on earth are you talking about? The photo is not fake. Farage was even reported to the police over its use:
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/16/nigel-farage-defends-ukip-breaking-point-poster-queue-of-migrants
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,476
@previous (A)
Ohh, he was reported was he? That sounds like when Mueller indicted all those "Russian hackers"
I assume it was the same outcome because courts aren't run by screeching squealing crybaby lefties
Ohh, he was reported was he? That sounds like when Mueller indicted all those "Russian hackers"
I assume it was the same outcome because courts aren't run by screeching squealing crybaby lefties
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,478
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,482
@previous (A)
What about one of the nurses being from a Commonwealth country? Why are you trying to fake news post?
What about one of the nurses being from a Commonwealth country? Why are you trying to fake news post?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,483
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,485
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,486
@previous (D)
I know you're joking, and you're doing the parody very well, but it's sobering to think that a lot of Brexiteers and Trump fans do actually 'think' like this when presented with facts. They just shut down and start screaming 'Fake News'.
I know you're joking, and you're doing the parody very well, but it's sobering to think that a lot of Brexiteers and Trump fans do actually 'think' like this when presented with facts. They just shut down and start screaming 'Fake News'.
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,488
@previous (A)
Your headline is fake news. You are ignoring the facts and are demonstrably wrong. Classic Fake Newser
Your headline is fake news. You are ignoring the facts and are demonstrably wrong. Classic Fake Newser
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,513
@1,112,465 (A)
What i find disturbing is that the "hero" rhetoric makes it sound like nurses are willingly laying down their lives and makes it seem more acceptable that they aren't being given proper PPE or hazard pay
What i find disturbing is that the "hero" rhetoric makes it sound like nurses are willingly laying down their lives and makes it seem more acceptable that they aren't being given proper PPE or hazard pay
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,517
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 25 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,528
@previous (D)
https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-uk-nurses-forced-to-wear-bin-bags-test-positive-2020-4
3 nurses in the UK forced to wear trash bags instead of real protective gear have tested positive for the coronavirus
https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-uk-nurses-forced-to-wear-bin-bags-test-positive-2020-4
3 nurses in the UK forced to wear trash bags instead of real protective gear have tested positive for the coronavirus
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,529
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 39 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,530
Lefty Larue replied with this 6 years ago, 54 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,531
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,532
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,534
@1,112,528 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Ffs read the articles
> The three frontline staff were pictured wearing clinical waste bags on their heads and feet at Northwick Park Hospital in Harrow last month.
> On their heads and feet
Hairnets and overshoes... Okay.
Ffs read the articles
> The three frontline staff were pictured wearing clinical waste bags on their heads and feet at Northwick Park Hospital in Harrow last month.
> On their heads and feet
Hairnets and overshoes... Okay.
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,535
@1,112,532 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
You jump in with you outlandish opinions on U.S. affairs several times per day though, lol.
You jump in with you outlandish opinions on U.S. affairs several times per day though, lol.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,538
@previous (B)
And now you're inserting your outlandish opinions on US affairs to conversations about the UK.
@1,112,534 (D)
There's pictures of nurses wearing trash bags around their torsos as well
And now you're inserting your outlandish opinions on US affairs to conversations about the UK.
@1,112,534 (D)
There's pictures of nurses wearing trash bags around their torsos as well
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,542
@1,112,528 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
This awful. I know there's shortages all over, but frontline staff like that shouldn't be left like that.
@1,112,534 (D)
@1,112,535 (B)
Sigh. Why can't you just react normally? You two can't resist viewing everything through your politics, can you?
This awful. I know there's shortages all over, but frontline staff like that shouldn't be left like that.
@1,112,534 (D)
@1,112,535 (B)
Sigh. Why can't you just react normally? You two can't resist viewing everything through your politics, can you?
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,544
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
Yeah, it's awful. A bunch of seniors in a care home died here after the staff quit due to lack of PPE.
Yeah, it's awful. A bunch of seniors in a care home died here after the staff quit due to lack of PPE.
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,545
@1,112,542 (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
I want to relate with her on a friendly basis...but she is insane.
I want to relate with her on a friendly basis...but she is insane.
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,558
@1,112,538 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Ever feel like you've been manipulated by fake news? You didn't even read the article referenced, just the headline and looked at the picture and believe the fake news as you are supposed to...
They aren't wearing fucking trashbags retard. They have medical waste bags on their heads and feet.
Ever feel like you've been manipulated by fake news? You didn't even read the article referenced, just the headline and looked at the picture and believe the fake news as you are supposed to...
They aren't wearing fucking trashbags retard. They have medical waste bags on their heads and feet.
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,562
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,565
@1,112,558 (D)
I read the article. Within that article there is even a picture of nurses wearing trash bags around their torsos.
@previous (B)
What does Trump have to do with nurses not having proper PPE in the UK?
I read the article. Within that article there is even a picture of nurses wearing trash bags around their torsos.
@previous (B)
What does Trump have to do with nurses not having proper PPE in the UK?
tteh !GETFUCKED joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,567
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,575
@1,112,565 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Those aren't trash bags. It shows them with medical waste bags on their heads. The article clearly states they were wearing them on their heads and feet. Nowhere does it say they were wearing trash bags. You read the headline, looked at the picture, and made the assumption (that fake news wanted you to make) that they were wearing trash bags on their bodies.
Those aren't trash bags. It shows them with medical waste bags on their heads. The article clearly states they were wearing them on their heads and feet. Nowhere does it say they were wearing trash bags. You read the headline, looked at the picture, and made the assumption (that fake news wanted you to make) that they were wearing trash bags on their bodies.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 36 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,577
@1,112,558 (D)
I know you're deep into your politics, but is it so hard to offer some words of sympathy to nurses who are clearly under-supplied? Even if they are medical waste bags, they should ideally have actual PPE. Just a few sympathetic words would be nice.
I promise you that it won't count as conceding anything to the liberals!
@1,112,562 (B)
It's the UK. Trump has nothing to do with it. Will you believe that if someone who isn't Triptych says it?
I know you're deep into your politics, but is it so hard to offer some words of sympathy to nurses who are clearly under-supplied? Even if they are medical waste bags, they should ideally have actual PPE. Just a few sympathetic words would be nice.
I promise you that it won't count as conceding anything to the liberals!
@1,112,562 (B)
It's the UK. Trump has nothing to do with it. Will you believe that if someone who isn't Triptych says it?
(Edited 26 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 39 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,578
@1,112,567 (tteh !GETFUCKED)
They are clearly marked hazardous clinical waste bags. The things they are wearing on their heads ffs
They are clearly marked hazardous clinical waste bags. The things they are wearing on their heads ffs
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 6 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,579
@1,112,575 (D)
Medical waste bags are trash bags. What do you think medical waste is?
And obviously nurses are wearing trash bags, from the picture showing nurses wearing trash bags.
Medical waste bags are trash bags. What do you think medical waste is?
And obviously nurses are wearing trash bags, from the picture showing nurses wearing trash bags.
tteh !GETFUCKED replied with this 6 years ago, 50 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,581
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,591
Jesus Christ. Look at the yellow striped clinical waste bags on their heads. Read the article about them wearing them on their heads.
You don't put clinical waste in trash bags.
Their protective coveralls are probably made from the same material as trash bags anyway.
The article is about a lack of hair nets and how they put the most bulletproof bags designed to stop the spread of everything contagious in a hospital, on their heads instead.
You don't put clinical waste in trash bags.
Their protective coveralls are probably made from the same material as trash bags anyway.
The article is about a lack of hair nets and how they put the most bulletproof bags designed to stop the spread of everything contagious in a hospital, on their heads instead.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,593
@previous (D)
And it was insufficient to prevent them from getting infected. That hospital was one of the first to report critical shortages of PPE.
And it was insufficient to prevent them from getting infected. That hospital was one of the first to report critical shortages of PPE.
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 44 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,594
Wait, I was assuming anon D was a parody of a retarded Trump worshipper. But he's actually for real??
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,596
Orange Man is bad...Orange man is bad.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,597
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 31 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,598
@1,112,593 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
You think a hairnet is more resilient than a clinical waste bag? You aren't serious. Enjoy your fake news.
You think a hairnet is more resilient than a clinical waste bag? You aren't serious. Enjoy your fake news.
Anonymous D double-posted this 6 years ago, 29 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,599
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,603
Oi! Dats a sticky wicket, innit guv? Dey may nevuh git does Pakis out of England at dis rate.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 2 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,604
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 59 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,607
I can't decide whether to laugh or cringe.
Anonymous D cannot concede that nurses wearing bin bags in a pandemic isn't right, or that the article said that this likely resulted in them being infected. You'd think that nurses being forced to wear bloody bin bags whilst treating a dangerous virus would be something anyone anyone condemn, but I guess not!
Meanwhile, Anonymous B is so fixated on US politics that he can't grasp that this is happening in the UK and President Trump has nothing to do with it. Two posters have told him as much, but he is still convinced that this is a plot to smear Emperor Trump.
Anonymous D cannot concede that nurses wearing bin bags in a pandemic isn't right, or that the article said that this likely resulted in them being infected. You'd think that nurses being forced to wear bloody bin bags whilst treating a dangerous virus would be something anyone anyone condemn, but I guess not!
Meanwhile, Anonymous B is so fixated on US politics that he can't grasp that this is happening in the UK and President Trump has nothing to do with it. Two posters have told him as much, but he is still convinced that this is a plot to smear Emperor Trump.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 59 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,609
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,611
@1,112,604 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Not because they are wearing trash bags as coveralls though, like you were manipulated to believe, or just made your own ridiculous assumptions about. And not because clinical waste bags are less effective than hairnets at containing viruses.
Not because they are wearing trash bags as coveralls though, like you were manipulated to believe, or just made your own ridiculous assumptions about. And not because clinical waste bags are less effective than hairnets at containing viruses.
Anonymous D double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,616
@1,112,607 (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
Small, hazardous goods, clearly marked, clinical waste bags on their heads. Look at the picture, read the article. They aren't wearing bin bags on their bodies
Small, hazardous goods, clearly marked, clinical waste bags on their heads. Look at the picture, read the article. They aren't wearing bin bags on their bodies
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,618
@1,112,611 (D)
Hairnets and bin bags serve different purposes. Hairnets keep your hair up and out of your face, so you don't need to touch your face. Bin bags are not very good for this. I use bags like that when i dye my hair, and you have to touch your face a lot to readjust them. This increases infection risk. Obviously if they had sufficient PPE, 50% of the nurses at that hospital would not be infected.
Hairnets and bin bags serve different purposes. Hairnets keep your hair up and out of your face, so you don't need to touch your face. Bin bags are not very good for this. I use bags like that when i dye my hair, and you have to touch your face a lot to readjust them. This increases infection risk. Obviously if they had sufficient PPE, 50% of the nurses at that hospital would not be infected.
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,621
And what has any of this got to do with Trump? The only mention even slightly hinting at Trump is the post I made about Farage being reported to the police as having as much weight as the Russian indictments. Which is none. Reporting someone to the police because you don't like a picture is fucking retarded and does not mean there is a charge, a trial, or a conviction.
"This picture is bad, because it was reported to the police" fuck off.
"This picture is bad, because it was reported to the police" fuck off.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 40 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,622
@1,112,616 (D)You read it. Look, here's a screenshot. Those first and third bullet points are important. The nurses did not have the correct PPE and were infected. The UK nurses association has said that this is a problem for nurses around the country.
All that's being said here is that there's a lack of proper PPE, and it's increasing the risk of frontline staff getting infected. Why is this is so hard for you to accept? It's not some culture war thing, it's not some liberal fake news plot. It should be an apolitical thing that we can all say is bad.
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 46 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,623
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,624
@1,112,618 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
The nurses aren't wearing trash bags on their bodies. The picture doesn't show them wearing trash bags on their bodies. The article doesn't say they are wearing trash bags on their bodies.
The nurses aren't wearing trash bags on their bodies. The picture doesn't show them wearing trash bags on their bodies. The article doesn't say they are wearing trash bags on their bodies.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,625
@previous (D)
That doesn't respond to my comment at all. I've worn bags on my head like that and they aren't an adequate replacement for hairnets because you need to frequently readjust them, touching your face and increasing the risk of infection.
That doesn't respond to my comment at all. I've worn bags on my head like that and they aren't an adequate replacement for hairnets because you need to frequently readjust them, touching your face and increasing the risk of infection.
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,630
Oh Jesus the freaks are out tonight
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,632
@1,112,622 (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
The telegraph article is about a picture of three nurses wearing clinical waste bags on their heads and feet. "Trash bags" is trash news.
Maybe they ran out of gloves and got infected, who knows? It's all very vague about what specific articles of PPE are missing, other than hairnets and booties, obviously.
The telegraph article is about a picture of three nurses wearing clinical waste bags on their heads and feet. "Trash bags" is trash news.
Maybe they ran out of gloves and got infected, who knows? It's all very vague about what specific articles of PPE are missing, other than hairnets and booties, obviously.
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 34 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,635
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,639
@1,112,625 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Wait, are you going to finally admit that they aren't wearing trash bags on their bodies, and that your assumptions are clearly false?
"But maybe they had to adjust the bags" sure. Fine. Maybe.
Wait, are you going to finally admit that they aren't wearing trash bags on their bodies, and that your assumptions are clearly false?
"But maybe they had to adjust the bags" sure. Fine. Maybe.
Anonymous D double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,640
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 59 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,641
@1,112,639 (D)
Why can't you admit that nurses are falling ill because they don't have proper/adequate PPE and that's a bad thing?
Why can't you admit that nurses are falling ill because they don't have proper/adequate PPE and that's a bad thing?
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,643
@1,112,640 (D)
> OP described it as fake news.
That doesn't answer the question. You said "That photo is fake". Why? The photo isn't fake.
> OP described it as fake news.
That doesn't answer the question. You said "That photo is fake". Why? The photo isn't fake.
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 26 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,644
@1,112,641 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I can. I just know that they are not wearing "trash bags" on their bodies and that is supposedly the 100% conclusive reason they contracted the virus.
I can. I just know that they are not wearing "trash bags" on their bodies and that is supposedly the 100% conclusive reason they contracted the virus.
Anonymous D double-posted this 6 years ago, 42 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,645
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 26 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,647
@1,112,644 (D)
Why do you think they're contracting the virus, if it's not because of lack of proper PPE?
Why do you think they're contracting the virus, if it's not because of lack of proper PPE?
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,649
@1,112,645 (D)
> Work on your reading comprehension.
It's you who needs to do this. OP didn't describe the photo as fake. He said Farage's description of what it depicted was false. And it was.
> Work on your reading comprehension.
It's you who needs to do this. OP didn't describe the photo as fake. He said Farage's description of what it depicted was false. And it was.
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,650
@1,112,647 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
There could be any number of reasons. Lack of hairnets and booties is not high on my list. If there was a picture of nurses wearing "trash bags" as masks and gloves then we can have that conversation.
There could be any number of reasons. Lack of hairnets and booties is not high on my list. If there was a picture of nurses wearing "trash bags" as masks and gloves then we can have that conversation.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,651
@1,112,632 (D)
The Association of British Medics and nurses are saying the same thing; there's a shortage of PPE and it's endangering frontliners. If this is fake, are they in on it too?
Look, lad, I understand it can feel a bit weak to admit you're wrong in an argument, a bit lame to concede something in an internet argument. But all I'm really asking here is for you to agree it's important that nurses get sufficient PPE while battling the coronavirus. That's not so bad, is it?
The Association of British Medics and nurses are saying the same thing; there's a shortage of PPE and it's endangering frontliners. If this is fake, are they in on it too?
Look, lad, I understand it can feel a bit weak to admit you're wrong in an argument, a bit lame to concede something in an internet argument. But all I'm really asking here is for you to agree it's important that nurses get sufficient PPE while battling the coronavirus. That's not so bad, is it?
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,652
@1,112,649 (H)
I didn't argue that the picture is fake, I thought that's what OP was implying. Hence the question. Work on your reading comprehension.
I didn't argue that the picture is fake, I thought that's what OP was implying. Hence the question. Work on your reading comprehension.
Anonymous D double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,654
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,659
@1,112,652 (D)
> I didn't argue that the picture is fake, I thought that's what OP was implying. Hence the question. Work on your reading comprehension.
So you admit you misunderstood what OP wrote and then you tell someone to work on their reading comprehension. Priceless.
> I didn't argue that the picture is fake, I thought that's what OP was implying. Hence the question. Work on your reading comprehension.
So you admit you misunderstood what OP wrote and then you tell someone to work on their reading comprehension. Priceless.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,661
@1,112,654 (D)
Not really. I think it's true that the nurses cited in that article didn't have enough protective equipment and were likely infected because of it. That's the crux of the issue, not semantics over whether to call the bags bin bags or medical waste bags.
Not really. I think it's true that the nurses cited in that article didn't have enough protective equipment and were likely infected because of it. That's the crux of the issue, not semantics over whether to call the bags bin bags or medical waste bags.
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,678
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
They do not have bin bags on their bodies.
@1,112,659 (H)
When there is a question mark, it means it is a question. Keep working on your reading comprehension.
They do not have bin bags on their bodies.
@1,112,659 (H)
When there is a question mark, it means it is a question. Keep working on your reading comprehension.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,679
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,686
@1,112,678 (D)
> When there is a question mark, it means it is a question.
And when you mistake what the OP was clearly saying and then tell someone to work on their reading comprehension, it's priceless.
> When there is a question mark, it means it is a question.
And when you mistake what the OP was clearly saying and then tell someone to work on their reading comprehension, it's priceless.
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,694
@previous (H)
You said I made the statement that it was a fake picture. I told you, and still am telling you, to work on your reading comprehension. Look for question marks to help you identify questions, and not conclude they are statements with squiggly lines over a dot at the end.
You said I made the statement that it was a fake picture. I told you, and still am telling you, to work on your reading comprehension. Look for question marks to help you identify questions, and not conclude they are statements with squiggly lines over a dot at the end.
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,699
@previous (D)
> You said I made the statement that it was a fake picture.
Which you did. And it isn't. Why are you still struggling to understand this? Is it because of your poor reading comprehension?
> You said I made the statement that it was a fake picture.
Which you did. And it isn't. Why are you still struggling to understand this? Is it because of your poor reading comprehension?
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,702
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,112,704
@previous (D)
Did you see where you misunderstood what the OP said and then told someone else to work on their reading comprehension? That was priceless.
Did you see where you misunderstood what the OP said and then told someone else to work on their reading comprehension? That was priceless.