Topic: Sanders might get 2 new houses this time
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #98,448
Donations in January were 26 million and in February 46 million.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,110,677
I'm guessing that he'll be camping next time too lol
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,110,680
All he has to do is launder the money through his supposed book sales.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 50 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,110,708
He needs that money for his senate re-election campaign. That way he can hire all his loyalists and pay them exorbitant salaries
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,110,723
@previous (C)
He won't even pay his staffers a so called living wage, which by the way he was vehemently condemning others for not doing.
He won't even pay his staffers a so called living wage, which by the way he was vehemently condemning others for not doing.
(Edited 59 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,110,726
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,110,727
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Initially there definitely were! Only after he was chastising many employers in the country for not doing so...his own business matters were scrutinized publically and then and only then did he make adjustments with his own workers like cutting their hours before announcing that he would begin paying all of the 15 an hour. Yep.
Initially there definitely were! Only after he was chastising many employers in the country for not doing so...his own business matters were scrutinized publically and then and only then did he make adjustments with his own workers like cutting their hours before announcing that he would begin paying all of the 15 an hour. Yep.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,110,731
@previous (A)
So when you said "he won't pay his staffers a living wage", you meant "he did pay all of his staffers a living wage, just not all of them from the very beginning". Which is a fair criticism but phrased in a way that is factually not true. I wonder where you got that habit from.
So when you said "he won't pay his staffers a living wage", you meant "he did pay all of his staffers a living wage, just not all of them from the very beginning". Which is a fair criticism but phrased in a way that is factually not true. I wonder where you got that habit from.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,110,806
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,110,820
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,110,827
@1,110,806 (A)
I agree. He was still paying them $36,000 per year, but they were working effectively 60 hour weeks, not 40 hour weeks. That was bad and I'm glad he corrected it and put his money where his mouth was. I don't really see that as a huge knock against him, though Sanders is far from perfect.
I agree. He was still paying them $36,000 per year, but they were working effectively 60 hour weeks, not 40 hour weeks. That was bad and I'm glad he corrected it and put his money where his mouth was. I don't really see that as a huge knock against him, though Sanders is far from perfect.