Topic: Re: If enough people agree on something here, is it automatically true?
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #9,836
For example, if enough people agree that Syntax is Matt, does it become a scientifically verified fact?
Sup Matt
Sup Syntax
Sup Kimmo
Sup To4str
Sup TG
Sup Bobby
Sup (insert handle here)
Sup Matt
Sup Syntax
Sup Kimmo
Sup To4str
Sup TG
Sup Bobby
Sup (insert handle here)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 42 seconds later[^] [v] #175,577
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum
(Edited 35 seconds later.)
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 0 seconds later, 42 seconds after the original post[^] [v] #175,578
eat shit, you just made this topic in a different thread.
(Edited 19 seconds later.)
Falco !PZmcClOUDk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 25 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #175,579
sup to4str?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,583
@previous (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
How do you know I'm To4str and not one of those other faggots?
How do you know I'm To4str and not one of those other faggots?
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
cat500 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,595
that's what happened when people started to dislike dm
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 15 years ago, 47 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,596
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,600
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,606
Social consensus through the influence of committed minorities
> We show how the prevailing majority opinion in a population can be rapidly reversed by a small fraction p of randomly distributed committed agents who consistently proselytize the opposing opinion and are immune to influence. Specifically, we show that when the committed fraction grows beyond a critical value pc ≈ 10%, there is a dramatic decrease in the time, Tc, taken for the entire population to adopt the committed opinion.
See also: Minority Rules: Scientists Discover Tipping Point for the Spread of Ideas
> We show how the prevailing majority opinion in a population can be rapidly reversed by a small fraction p of randomly distributed committed agents who consistently proselytize the opposing opinion and are immune to influence. Specifically, we show that when the committed fraction grows beyond a critical value pc ≈ 10%, there is a dramatic decrease in the time, Tc, taken for the entire population to adopt the committed opinion.
See also: Minority Rules: Scientists Discover Tipping Point for the Spread of Ideas
(Edited 8 minutes later.)
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 15 years ago, 38 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,608
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,611
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,614
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,616
Falco: Anonymous C is disagreeing with you. Does that automatically make him to4str?
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 4 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,617
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,618
vocalon !!dX0knrTu5 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,619
Yep.
And that's why B2S is TG, everybody's sim, and pedophiles are bad.
And that's why B2S is TG, everybody's sim, and pedophiles are bad.
Voice of !WisdomHsuU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,620
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,629
@175,619 (vocalon !!dX0knrTu5)
Allow me to rephrase:
Everyone agrees Matt is a pedophile = Proven beyond the shadow of a doubt.
Everyone agrees God exists = Unproven, no scientific evidence whatsoever, STFU chistfag.
Allow me to rephrase:
Everyone agrees Matt is a pedophile = Proven beyond the shadow of a doubt.
Everyone agrees God exists = Unproven, no scientific evidence whatsoever, STFU chistfag.
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,633
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,634
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 59 seconds later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,636
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 27 seconds later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,637
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,638
Sup OP
Ur a faget
Ur a faget
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #175,640
yes
!ocurburUbk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 59 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #175,683
No?