Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later[^][v]#1,103,316
They don't need to be sending everyone in the country two damn thousand a month for a year or more. If some get it they will do 2000 dollars of cocaine a month.
Hell, that's 24 grand in a year.
Bernie also calls for anyone who loses their job to get 100 percent of what their salary was in unemployment checks.
Omfg..
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,103,317
> 350,000,000 people $2000 per month for 12 month(One year)
I love how you switched out "household" in the title for "people" in your made-up-on-the-spot 'analysis'. Have you considered applying to work for Fox News?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,103,319
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Have you ever considered stopping your abuse toward children?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,103,320
@1,103,317 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
So what you dick. The issue is it's a fucking stupid decision to send out 2000 dollars each month to people.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,103,321
@previous (A)
But you'll have no problem spending it when it shows up in your mom's mailbox, will you?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,103,323
@1,103,317 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
I mean I would get a rock hard erection and dance around if they start sending me 2000 checks every month.
But IF I got a vote on this idea for the country I'd say NO.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,103,326
> So what you dick. The issue is it's a fucking stupid decision to send out 2000 dollars each month to people.
No, the issue is that nobody has suggested sending 2000 dollars a month to 350 million people, which is what you were claiming Bernie Sanders was calling for.
When you deal with reality rather than Fox News, you'll find you get worked up far less.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 25 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,103,328
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,103,331
Father Merrin must be a Jesuit given his liberal tendencies
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,103,352
@1,103,328 (A)
When the person you voted for proposes sending cash to households, you support it. When the person you didn’t vote for proposes sending cash to households, you don’t support it.
Do I have this right?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,103,354
@previous (E)
I support the two proposed stimulus checks which have apparently been approved.
I do not support the monthly stimulus checks which have been proposed by others.
That is my position.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,103,357
Yes, your post about Bernie wanting to send 2000 dollars to every American citizen was a stupid idea. Thanks for posting an article that proves he never said it.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,360
@1,103,354 (A)
What is the big difference? Is it the length of time? If the purpose of the checks is to stimulate the economy while businesses are effectively shut down or severely limited, why would two checks be good but more checks be bad? The virus is not going to go away entirely by May. I don't understand the reasoning.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,366
@1,103,357 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
If I actually smacked you in the teeth but said I smacked you on the side of your head, you would still fall down and cry.
(Edited 8 minutes later.)
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,368
@previous (A)
And if Bernie Sanders says one thing and Fox News feeds you something entirely different, you'll still work yourself up into a frenzy.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,369
@1,103,360 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Why don't they send every $20,000 every 2 months and buy everyone a new Cadillac? And at 4th of July send everyone a gold bar with a flag painted on it, with a nice note attached.
More is better than less, right goofball?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,374
@previous (A)
Again, why is $1,000/month good but $2,000/month catastrophic? It's a couple hundred billion extra but you didn't seem to be particularly concerned when trump was running $1 trillion/year deficits his entire presidency. I cant imagine you suddenly care about that now.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,375
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
The checksI referred to are 1 time payments. Do you have a reading. Comprehension problem?
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,376
@1,103,374 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Which recent Presidents did not?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,377
@1,103,375 (A)
The last plans I saw from the WH were 2 checks one in April and one in May. So 2 checks are bad but 4 checks are the end of the world? I could also very easily see the WH doing more than two checks as the shutdown/quarantine goes on. I am just trying to find the dividing line here. As far as I can tell the dividing line is "When trump does it, good. When bernie does it, bad." If you can articulate an actual principled objection or guidepost I'm happy to hear it.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,378
@1,103,376 (A)
So then if huge deficits arent actually the issue...what is the issue?
Apocalypse Indy !bYobIzYIFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,379
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,380
@1,103,377 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Damn you you simpering gimp.
> The last plans I saw from the WH were 2 checks one in April and one in May. So 2 checks are bad but 4 checks are the end of the world?
You know good and goddamn well what's being said but you just like running your damn mouth talking shit.
Yes, I believe a couple of checks are good but NO, the post is about Bernie (or any number of other congressmen even repubs) talking about a check every month...as in a check a month every month...until the coronavirus is dealt with. Meaning six, eight or 12 months who knows maybe two years.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Apocalypse Indy !bYobIzYIFE replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,381
@previous (A)
It always amazes me that the laziest, poorest, most uneducated Americans always vote for the interests of the wealthy against their own.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,385
@previous (Apocalypse Indy !bYobIzYIFE)
That is a erroneous statement...not germane, really.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 28 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,386
@1,103,380 (A)
If the purpose of the checks is to stave off economic catastrophe while the virus runs its course through America over the next year, what good are checks in April and May going to do businesses trying to stay alive in August? I genuinely do not understand your thought process. Either the checks are an effective policy tool to keep consumers buying things while their jobs are shut down, or they aren't. If they are, you should do them for as long as the virus is shutting down businesses. If they aren't you should do something else. Doing it only two times because two is a small number makes zero sense.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,389
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Then, as I already asked you..as you threw this hogwash in earlier..
Why don't they send every $20,000 every 2 months and buy everyone a new Cadillac? And at 4th of July send everyone a gold bar with a flag painted on it, with a nice note attached.
More is better than less, right goofball?
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,391
@1,103,386 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
When is it too much? This could throw us into a depression you know.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,392
@1,103,389 (A)
Because that would not be merely replacing people's incomes, it would be a massive and totally world economy destroying giveaway. This is so stupid.
"I think we should order pizza for dinner since we have no food in the house"
"One Pizza? Why don't we just buy the entire Pizza Hut franchise and also 12 yachts?"
What is the purpose of the policy, and is it the best way to achieve that purpose? I can answer that for the $2,000/month checks for as long as businesses are shut down or limited. I could not begin to answer that for your "counter".
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,394
@1,103,391 (A)
If you think we aren't in economically dire straits right now, wait until you see the March jobs report and unemployment requests. We are already in the worst time of anyone who didn't live through the great depression. You just haven't fully recognized that yet.
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 35 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,405
> I support the two proposed stimulus checks which have apparently been approved. > I do not support the monthly stimulus checks which have been proposed by others. > That is my position.
So, you only approve of free government money when the man you voted for gives you the money.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 48 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,420
@previous (E)
If a Dem Pres was in office (God forbid)
I would support this current thing.
This is not ordinary welfare. And Im not against standardwelfare either, not at all. Y'all have misunderstood my views on that.
This right here shows loud and clear how liberals in Government want control of us all. We feel like they have to save us or we're doomed. It should not have ever gotten to to this.
But one thing is certain...its the Democrats and no one else that has groomed us to be beholden to the Government for solving our problems.
Cradle to the grave.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,421
@previous (A)
What's your take on the government constantly bailing out your farmers? And your auto industry? And your airline industry? And your banks? And...
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,423
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
I want to know what happened to Detroit.
We gave them billions and it didn't work out so well.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,425
> I want to know what happened to Detroit. > We gave them billions and it didn't work out so well.
Trump keeps on giving the farmers billions too and it also never seems to help since 6 months later they need another bailout. I'll ask you again: what's your take on that?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,426
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Don't know much about it.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,431
@previous (A)
Figures. I've always wondered why Trump fans adore him and it invariably turns out they have no idea about the reality of his policies.
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,103,436
@1,103,420 (A) So, you only approve of free government money when the man you voted for gives you the money.