> Did you see my post in the other thread about why you should consider a full-length .45 or even .50 revolver instead?
Well the full length are bulky and a bit heavier. I was just thinking if I were ever to leave the house with it, the snub would be a bit more convenient.
Apocalypse Indy !bYobIzYIFE (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,103,040
@previous (E)
It is definitely more portable. The problem is that, if society breaks down, your range is very short. You will have to be right up in the zombie herds, while I can stand farther back and mow them down.
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,103,041
@previous (Apocalypse Indy !bYobIzYIFE)
Like Clint Eastwood!
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 51 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,103,042
@1,103,036 (D)
I consider "shtick" to be a routine to attract unwarranted attention.
Apocalypse Indy !bYobIzYIFE (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,103,044
@1,103,036 (D)
It is a repetitive, attention-getting behavior or saying. In this case, I actually did buy the rifle, and I actually am interested in the topic, so it is not a shtick. What is a shtick, however, is your posting, "It's a shtick" in every thread I make.
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,103,046