Minichan

Topic: If you do not own an Israeli Weapons Industries Tavor X95 16.5" barrel semi-automatic assault rifle.

Assault Indy started this discussion 6 years ago #97,639

...then what the hell do you plan on doing when society breaks down? It is coming, fora!

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,101,477

Assault weapons are not necessary for personal protection and should be banned for public safety reasons. Weapons designed to maximize casualties should be banned and only used by the military and law enforcement.

Assault Indy (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,101,491

@previous (B)
How exactly do you define "assault weapon"? The only difference between an assault rifle and a hunting rifle is the way it looks.

Green !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,101,500

Buttering bibles to the ceiling.

chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 25 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,101,517

Aren't you usually anti-gun?

Assault Indy (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,101,552

@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
No. I am ok with guns owned by responsibole non-criminals, if they are kept locked up at home, separate from the ammo, like the Swiss do. What I am against is carrying them around like an idiot, and irresponsible people having them.

Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,101,637

Hey, person attacking me, let me unlock my ammo, hold on

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,101,644

Externally hosted image

chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,101,652

@previous (F)
Having restrictive gun laws in a state doesn't make a difference when there's no border control between states. You can just drive over from a state with laxer gun laws.

Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,101,718

@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Wait a minute, are you implying that a criminal might ignore the laws?! Oh my God, that would mean that restrictive laws would only affect law abiding people thus punishing them unfairly and not resolving any issues at all!

dreamworks joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,101,736

@previous (F)
I think she's implying there need to be national gun laws!

Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 33 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,101,740

@previous (dreamworks)
Because then the criminals will obey the laws! Brilliant!

dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 51 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,101,756

@previous (F)
That's evident from gun legislation in other countries!

chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 5 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,101,850

@1,101,736 (dreamworks)
@1,101,740 (F)
@previous (dreamworks)
yes
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.