Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
I did all the math the web could provide on bacteria size vs range of Virus sizes including the new Coronavirus and the ordinary masks only perhaps help those infected OR OR hurt them even more by concentrating the virus so they keep breathing more of it in
Does NOTHING help those wearing them when near someone with the virus - COULD help for bacteria's
dreamworks joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,098,267
@1,098,147 (Syntax)
Luckily America doesn't have any coal electricity plants!
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 21 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,098,274
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,098,277
@previous (E)
Yeah, yeah, yeah, gramps. Back in yer day ya had diabetus
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,098,282
@previous (A) > Back in yer day ya had diabetus
Medicare-covered test strips and supplies were available and Liberty Medical would even send you a free meter!
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,098,285
According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, 27 gigawatts of capacity from coal-fired generators is to be retired from 175 coal-fired power plants between 2012 and 2016.
Looked real hard for the date of the last new coal plant built and with out of time for REAL REAL Life outside the Net this Saturday
The developer of a proposed 320-megawatt unit in Wyoming is facing jail time after pleading guilty to stealing government cash. A Kentucky coke plant that would have generated electricity as a byproduct has been scrapped. And a planned $2.1 billion plant in Georgia has idled.
The sole U.S. coal facility under construction: a tiny plant being built by the University of Alaska, Fairbanks.
The dynamic amounts to an existential crisis for the U.S. coal industry. While coal still accounts for roughly a third of U.S. power generation, the industry is contracting as plants retire and utilities replace them with natural gas and renewables.
Coal-based power generation The Netherlands has five coal-fired plants.Three new coal-fired plants were opened from 2015-2016, two in the Maasvlakte and one in the Eemshaven last year. Additionally, two other plants (Maasvlakte I and II) are planned to be closed before the first of July, 2017, they remain open. A discussion is taking place on what to do with the operational five coal-fired plants, whether they should be closed down or not. However, according to the government the remaining five plants should stay open because the Netherlands depends on the energy produced by these coal-fired plants.
How many coal power plants are being built in China?
In addition to roughly 1,000 gigawatts of existing coal capacity, China has 121 gigawatts of coal plants under construction, which is more than is being built in the rest of the world combined.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,098,286
@previous (Syntax)
We have a lot of coal so I would like the US to keep coal mining and electricity generation infrastructure going for energy independence. Between fracking and coal, I think we can completely divorce ourselves from the middle east.
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,098,289
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs) > we can completely divorce ourselves from the middle east.
All we have to do is get Jared Kushner to phone up his buddy the Saudi Crown Prince and say "Talaq" a few times. I don't understand why everyone is overthinking this.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 50 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,098,301
@1,098,286 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Fracking and coal are both horrible for the environment.
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,098,307
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Yeah. But living in an industrialized first world country is nice. I think the tradeoff is worth it.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,098,313
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
But you can do that while transitioning to clean energy. And future generations who actually have to live in the environment ruined by coal and fracking may disagree with you.
(Edited 41 seconds later.)
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,098,367
@1,098,147 (Syntax)
You are repulsive. Could you please do us all a favor and die soon.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,098,461
> OUT of time or close to and composed a reply with all the MATH > > Bottom line is this - Even the Pro mask that costs $50 does not stop the small Virus - Does much better with bacterial > >https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/personal-protective-equipment-infection-control/n95-respirators-and-surgical-masks-face-masks > > I did all the math the web could provide on bacteria size vs range of Virus sizes including the new Coronavirus and the ordinary masks only perhaps help those infected OR OR hurt them even more by concentrating the virus so they keep breathing more of it in > > Does NOTHING help those wearing them when near someone with the virus - COULD help for bacteria's
you cant even grasp basic subtraction how the fuck do you think anyone believes anything you have to say you fucking retard