Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Topic: Yo Cathy this is a quick example of how easy it is to see what is on a drive
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago#97,161
This in my Win10 Machine that I only use for play NEVER ever work related anything - Except I long ago sighed my rites away to let a company do installs of programs to protect stuff in case I were to use it by mistrake for work related anything.
Image in my SSD drive - For example The Middle Aqua Green area are my MP-4 for SanDisk and I can hover over each segment and see Exactly the full name of the file And as I said the other panes on this program show no evidence of MS Word files, yet I can see in another pane all the file extensions I have and sure enough I can see each MS word file .doc and it's very easy to see where on the drive they are located.
I can see details about my Fav Browser I HAD no clue existed and for sure will explore that later.
Because it's SSD of course the location may change because that is the nature of what SSD must do for keeping files fresh from destruction/degradation
Yet no matter how they are re-allocated I can find them - This again is a totally FREE program and one of many - Just picked it because I long ago used it when something went missing. Found it with a file extension re-named do to a glitch and was able to bring it fully back after I had the info I needed.
And again IF you use this and see the No responding message just sit back because it does take time for the program to search out each Hex file BUT it does NOT show the name in Hex like the one you have to pay cold hard cash for and then do a hand conversion of each which is just so crazy
Now some MC idiot will cum along and say this is to Groom you - They of course have been doing their Mom up the ass for years and are happy to admit that much.
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later[^][v]#1,096,569
hmmm, tit pics
Syntax (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,096,571
Indeed I did a down load this AM of nipples for a TC reply and need to see if anyone enjoyed the unique Nips
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,096,572
@OP
You should try turning down the specular highlights on your storage media. That kind of reflectivity can really cause a lot of wear and tear on your data, particularly if you are using exFAT or NTFS file systems that are rated for lower reflectivity.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,096,575
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,096,578
@previous (Syntax)
Seriously, who chose to put lighting effects like that on a data visualization? Usually if you're trying to represent data visually you want every visual difference to mean something or indicate scale or change or some difference. You generally don't want useless pretty effects that could be mistaken for something meaningful. Ugh. I've spent a lot time just staring at that and thinking: "Why?" It offends my sensibilities in some new way that I haven't explored before.