Topic: Ok, which mod gave syntax even more permission to ban evade?
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #96,491
...(Edited 39 seconds later.)
beckyderp !3NeoVaGFAg joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later[^] [v] #1,088,911
lol
tteh !GETFUCKED joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,912
:3beckyderp !3NeoVaGFAg replied with this 6 years ago, 23 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,913
jodi !ariasXXmaE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 27 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,918
good lord. at least he has a fyne champagne party to go to, the poor old coot
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 49 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,942
@previous (jodi !ariasXXmaE)
I'm starting to think his whole life is a lie. He is proably living in a New Hampshire Nursing home.
I'm starting to think his whole life is a lie. He is proably living in a New Hampshire Nursing home.
dreamworks joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,971
Why does he specify french
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,975
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,976
Syntax should only be allowed to return if he seeks help for his logorrhea and his compulsive lying.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,977
@1,088,942 (E)
> I'm starting to think his whole life is a lie. He is proably living in a New Hampshire Nursing home.
lol no he doesn't lie about everything he just fabricates a whole lot ;-)
If Syntax wouldn't use all this information he looks up on people in here to hurt them or make them feel uncomfortable he is actually kind of comical to read some of his bullshit. You have to take him with a shaker of salt because he is as full of shit as a Christmas goose. But his stalking is totally overboard and he hurts and bothers people with it.
> I'm starting to think his whole life is a lie. He is proably living in a New Hampshire Nursing home.
lol no he doesn't lie about everything he just fabricates a whole lot ;-)
If Syntax wouldn't use all this information he looks up on people in here to hurt them or make them feel uncomfortable he is actually kind of comical to read some of his bullshit. You have to take him with a shaker of salt because he is as full of shit as a Christmas goose. But his stalking is totally overboard and he hurts and bothers people with it.
dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 43 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,979
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 36 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,980
@previous (dreamworks)
> yes which is already evident from the name of the fucking wine
Syntax is too dumb to know that Champagne is necessarily French.
> yes which is already evident from the name of the fucking wine
Syntax is too dumb to know that Champagne is necessarily French.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,062
@1,088,942 (E)
> I'm starting to think his whole life is a lie.
You're starting to think it? Did you miss his recent Howard Hughes debacle? It was already funny from the beginning but the constant doubling down made it into the stuff of comic legend:
"I once gassed up Howard Hughes' Pan Am 747 with my credit card"
"Hughes was TWA, not Pan AM"
"Fine, I meant TWA. But I still gassed it up while we were sitting on the tarmac in Spain"
"Direct flights to LA from Spain 20 years ago were unheard of"
"Fine, I meant France. But I still paid $11,000 to gas up a 747"
"It costs $200,000 to gas up a 747"
"Fine, I meant I paid to gas up the last few drops of fuel which the pilot's credit card couldn't cover"
"There is not a single international airport in the world that gives a 747 as much fuel as the pilot can pay for and then leaves him on the tarmac until he can come up with the rest"
"Errr...I have an important business meeting I need to get to. ZoooOOOOooooOOOooooOOOm!"
> I'm starting to think his whole life is a lie.
You're starting to think it? Did you miss his recent Howard Hughes debacle? It was already funny from the beginning but the constant doubling down made it into the stuff of comic legend:
"I once gassed up Howard Hughes' Pan Am 747 with my credit card"
"Hughes was TWA, not Pan AM"
"Fine, I meant TWA. But I still gassed it up while we were sitting on the tarmac in Spain"
"Direct flights to LA from Spain 20 years ago were unheard of"
"Fine, I meant France. But I still paid $11,000 to gas up a 747"
"It costs $200,000 to gas up a 747"
"Fine, I meant I paid to gas up the last few drops of fuel which the pilot's credit card couldn't cover"
"There is not a single international airport in the world that gives a 747 as much fuel as the pilot can pay for and then leaves him on the tarmac until he can come up with the rest"
"Errr...I have an important business meeting I need to get to. ZoooOOOOooooOOOooooOOOm!"
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,112
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,116
dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,123
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 20 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,373
@1,089,116 (M)
In Europe, only winemakers making it in the French region of Champagne are legally allowed to call their product Champagne. All other manufacturers must label it "Sparkling Wine".
In Europe, only winemakers making it in the French region of Champagne are legally allowed to call their product Champagne. All other manufacturers must label it "Sparkling Wine".
Anonymous M replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,377
@previous (L)
Brits with soda streams are now able to enjoy making their own traditional French Champagne thanks to brexit
Brits with soda streams are now able to enjoy making their own traditional French Champagne thanks to brexit
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,381
@previous (M)
That's actually untrue, as during the Transition Period™ all EU laws and regulations must be adhered to.
That's actually untrue, as during the Transition Period™ all EU laws and regulations must be adhered to.
Anonymous M replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,387
Gaz from Lewisham replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,389
@1,089,381 (L)
> That's actually untrue, as during the Transition Period™ all EU laws and regulations must be adhered to.
So the UK still has to abide by EU regulations but now has absolutely no say in any of them? Why didn't the poster on the side of the bus tell me that??
> That's actually untrue, as during the Transition Period™ all EU laws and regulations must be adhered to.
So the UK still has to abide by EU regulations but now has absolutely no say in any of them? Why didn't the poster on the side of the bus tell me that??
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,392
Syntax joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,393
@1,089,112 (L)> They don't have that protection in America. Anyone can make "champagne".
"California bubbly can't be called Champagne, because Champagne is a geographic designation — it's a region in northeast France. But most sparkling wine in California is made in the “Champagne method,” known across the pond as the méthode Champenoise.Nov 4, 2016"
Thank you Alexa
I guess it depends on where in USA? Need to return to email replies or I wood look up n C but in Calif - It ain't Champagne - That said here in Calif many FAMOUS French Champagne companies OWN and Make Version of Champagne - The problem is with the quality of our Soil - French Champagne is grown in crappy soil and it turns out that crappy soil is exactly what the grapes need - Our soil is too rich - To luxurious so the Pinot Noir and the Chardonnay grapes that is used to make Real Champagne ends up with a Richer whatever - Many are worthwhile but NONE are really Champagne -
Wood I for a brunch with friends over and berries are in season to put in Bubbly - Do so in Real Champagne? Never EVER - But in a Spanish or Calif Version Ya bet cha
(Edited 26 seconds later.)
Syntax double-posted this 6 years ago, 52 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,394
Damn and I cannot edit images such as one can do on TCAlas when I get tyme I will have to remind SYOPS of MC that such edit is overdue and software is already fully ritten for
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous M replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,395
The Board replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,396
@1,089,394 (Syntax)
It actually is designed, along with a few other features, but hasn't been rolled out yet. Soon™.
It actually is designed, along with a few other features, but hasn't been rolled out yet. Soon™.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 55 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,413
@previous (The Board)
All users should be able to delete and set each others images. It's like democracy. You can only post (and keep) an image if you get the majority to agree ?
All users should be able to delete and set each others images. It's like democracy. You can only post (and keep) an image if you get the majority to agree ?
Facts R Us replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,414
@1,089,395 (M)
Indeed I do. Detailed to one Mod
Which saves me the time to detail to Kook!
AND When I say in full bloody detail I mean Exactly That
Someone got some of it partially right very very little partially rite but NOT the Important Parts that make it work and make fully valid - and wood make it even hard to revoke - and saying that is going to get at least a couple3 juices flowing like crazy but alas Facts R Us
As well as the added new permission - Which apparently no one going to figure out nor could I even share that part with Kook well because I have Honor
Dreamworks a Man without honor but hey when one wears wood shoes and puts thumb in Dykes what u expect of such a person
Indeed I do. Detailed to one Mod
Which saves me the time to detail to Kook!
AND When I say in full bloody detail I mean Exactly That
Someone got some of it partially right very very little partially rite but NOT the Important Parts that make it work and make fully valid - and wood make it even hard to revoke - and saying that is going to get at least a couple3 juices flowing like crazy but alas Facts R Us
As well as the added new permission - Which apparently no one going to figure out nor could I even share that part with Kook well because I have Honor
Dreamworks a Man without honor but hey when one wears wood shoes and puts thumb in Dykes what u expect of such a person
Syntax joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,416
@1,089,396 (The Board)
Great cause I should have could have looked to see but assumed I had a second Image that was different but alas years later make a copy of an image and later with one hundred others to choose from PICK THE VERY SAME Image again but call it - 2 or whatever
Great cause I should have could have looked to see but assumed I had a second Image that was different but alas years later make a copy of an image and later with one hundred others to choose from PICK THE VERY SAME Image again but call it - 2 or whatever
Syntax joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,419
@1,089,413 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
> All users should be able to delete and set each others images. It's like democracy. You can only post (and keep) an image if you get the majority to agree ?
This ability does exist on TC
Given TC is mostly a copy of r04r work with minor changes and we all no that r04r simply copied Kimmo and made a clone of his... Sarcasm ok
My reaction image file is currently 2.55 GB (2,745,602,048 bytes) and does include lots of screen caps of polls and even some MC data such like stuff becky has posted when she shows the humor of people who file a request to be unbanned - Something I point out I have NEVER EVER Done - One exception of course as life is full of exceptions - Dreamworks perhaps by accident reminded of me asking for a favor on Cathy's Hug box wayyyyyy back in the days - Green back when was shall we say - Over the Top - Nor was I asking for a general unban - Hell every user was banned including the owner and Dreamworks LoL
I just needed to tell Cathy something in private so I made a simple request but alas no one could access the site
> All users should be able to delete and set each others images. It's like democracy. You can only post (and keep) an image if you get the majority to agree ?
This ability does exist on TC
Given TC is mostly a copy of r04r work with minor changes and we all no that r04r simply copied Kimmo and made a clone of his... Sarcasm ok
My reaction image file is currently 2.55 GB (2,745,602,048 bytes) and does include lots of screen caps of polls and even some MC data such like stuff becky has posted when she shows the humor of people who file a request to be unbanned - Something I point out I have NEVER EVER Done - One exception of course as life is full of exceptions - Dreamworks perhaps by accident reminded of me asking for a favor on Cathy's Hug box wayyyyyy back in the days - Green back when was shall we say - Over the Top - Nor was I asking for a general unban - Hell every user was banned including the owner and Dreamworks LoL
I just needed to tell Cathy something in private so I made a simple request but alas no one could access the site
jodi !ariasXXmaE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 56 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,089,440
@1,089,414 (Facts R Us)
> Indeed I do. Detailed to one Mod
>
> Which saves me the time to detail to Kook!
>
> AND When I say in full bloody detail I mean Exactly That
>
> Someone got some of it partially right very very little partially rite but NOT the Important Parts that make it work and make fully valid - and wood make it even hard to revoke - and saying that is going to get at least a couple3 juices flowing like crazy but alas Facts R Us
>
> As well as the added new permission - Which apparently no one going to figure out nor could I even share that part with Kook well because I have Honor
>
> Dreamworks a Man without honor but hey when one wears wood shoes and puts thumb in Dykes what u expect of such a person
lol
> Indeed I do. Detailed to one Mod
>
> Which saves me the time to detail to Kook!
>
> AND When I say in full bloody detail I mean Exactly That
>
> Someone got some of it partially right very very little partially rite but NOT the Important Parts that make it work and make fully valid - and wood make it even hard to revoke - and saying that is going to get at least a couple3 juices flowing like crazy but alas Facts R Us
>
> As well as the added new permission - Which apparently no one going to figure out nor could I even share that part with Kook well because I have Honor
>
> Dreamworks a Man without honor but hey when one wears wood shoes and puts thumb in Dykes what u expect of such a person
lol
