Topic: "Notice: Creation of new accounts have been temporarly disabled."
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #96,448
> Notice: Creation of new accounts have been temporarly disabled. If you have an account you can restore it in the dashboard.
> temporarly
Oh dear, not again.
> temporarly
Oh dear, not again.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,088,209
Teach the controversy.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,220
I wonder what defcon we are at.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,222
@previous (C)
Only Defcon 4, which blocks the creation of new UIDs. Already existing UIDs are unaffected.
Only Defcon 4, which blocks the creation of new UIDs. Already existing UIDs are unaffected.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,223
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
I see. Trying to prevent the Three Shitposteers from sneaking back in?
I see. Trying to prevent the Three Shitposteers from sneaking back in?
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,227
@previous (C)
Yeah. A short while on Defcon 4 is pretty standard after issuing a major ban like this.
Yeah. A short while on Defcon 4 is pretty standard after issuing a major ban like this.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,228
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
Makes sense. Especially when two of them had 300 UIDs a piece.
Makes sense. Especially when two of them had 300 UIDs a piece.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,231
@1,088,223 (C)
I prefer to call them the Three Stooges. Syntax is Moe, Matt is Larry, and Bert is Shemp/Curly/Joe.
I prefer to call them the Three Stooges. Syntax is Moe, Matt is Larry, and Bert is Shemp/Curly/Joe.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 weeks later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,096,738
This warning is back up again. What happened this time?
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,096,740
@previous (A)
Grover came back. It'll just be on for a short while so he can't immediately evade. Just a precaution, but in my experience it seems to do the trick.
As I said, a short while on Defcon 4 isn't uncommon after someone issues a noteworthy ban. Usually it's because someone who's been permabanned (such as Grover or Eco) tried to come back.
Grover came back. It'll just be on for a short while so he can't immediately evade. Just a precaution, but in my experience it seems to do the trick.
As I said, a short while on Defcon 4 isn't uncommon after someone issues a noteworthy ban. Usually it's because someone who's been permabanned (such as Grover or Eco) tried to come back.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,096,741
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,096,742
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
No he spams so friggin much and provides no other value. Also he posted a bomb threat on our forum which will draw the attention of feds and we do not want cops here.
No he spams so friggin much and provides no other value. Also he posted a bomb threat on our forum which will draw the attention of feds and we do not want cops here.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,096,744
I advocate letting everyone post but I agree with fake_anon on Eco. Dude just spams way too much
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,096,745
@1,096,741 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I could almost agree. He was definitely a character! But he was a lot of work to moderate, he'd quickly flood the front page with his crackhead blogging if he was allowed to.
The thing that actually got him permabanned though was him making a bomb threat. And while I think he's way more talk than action, we don't need of threats of violence on here. As Fake anon explained, that's a red line.
That said, he's posting very freely on Tinychan if you really want your fix of Eco.
I could almost agree. He was definitely a character! But he was a lot of work to moderate, he'd quickly flood the front page with his crackhead blogging if he was allowed to.
The thing that actually got him permabanned though was him making a bomb threat. And while I think he's way more talk than action, we don't need of threats of violence on here. As Fake anon explained, that's a red line.
That said, he's posting very freely on Tinychan if you really want your fix of Eco.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,096,746
@1,096,741 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
Plus, according to his recent post, he will round you up a gaggle of crackwhores if you want.
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
Plus, according to his recent post, he will round you up a gaggle of crackwhores if you want.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,096,827
@previous (C)
lol, I looked over there and I think I saw what you're referring to. Apparently he's rounding up "groupies" at a vegan cafe. I imagine that it was more like him bothering random women, if it indeed happened in some form.
lol, I looked over there and I think I saw what you're referring to. Apparently he's rounding up "groupies" at a vegan cafe. I imagine that it was more like him bothering random women, if it indeed happened in some form.
(Edited 8 minutes later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,096,831
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,096,839
@1,096,827 (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
I don't read any Eco post, tbh, but I'm certain it happened one of those two ways. It is completely possible he rounded up random crackwhores at the vegan shop, too.
@previous (B)
Would murder of crackwhores be more accurate?
I don't read any Eco post, tbh, but I'm certain it happened one of those two ways. It is completely possible he rounded up random crackwhores at the vegan shop, too.
@previous (B)
Would murder of crackwhores be more accurate?
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,096,840
@previous (C)
> Would murder of crackwhores be more accurate?
I honestly don't know. I'm curious as to whether there has ever been a precedent set before as to usage.
> Would murder of crackwhores be more accurate?
I honestly don't know. I'm curious as to whether there has ever been a precedent set before as to usage.
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 44 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,096,844
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,096,845
@previous (E)
In short, he was a massive paedophile. Constantly made suggestive posts about his supposed, very underage niece. He ignored numerous requests to stop doing that so he was banned.
Believe me, he added very little to the board other than posts lusting after an underage relative.
Come to think of it, I wonder if he was an Anontalk refugee? The old Anontalk URL points here, so we would get the occasional AT paedo wandering in, thinking this was some successor to AT. Usually they were quietly banned. He never mentioned AT, but it wouldn't surprise me.
In short, he was a massive paedophile. Constantly made suggestive posts about his supposed, very underage niece. He ignored numerous requests to stop doing that so he was banned.
Believe me, he added very little to the board other than posts lusting after an underage relative.
Come to think of it, I wonder if he was an Anontalk refugee? The old Anontalk URL points here, so we would get the occasional AT paedo wandering in, thinking this was some successor to AT. Usually they were quietly banned. He never mentioned AT, but it wouldn't surprise me.
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,096,849
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
Lots of people here seem to be pedophiles based on what they post. Three specific men, who I won’t name right now, come to mind.
Lots of people here seem to be pedophiles based on what they post. Three specific men, who I won’t name right now, come to mind.
(Edited 45 seconds later.)
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,096,850
I can't believe you've done this.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 days later, 4 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,097,874
The site is on lockdown again.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,097,882
@previous (A)
In honor of you diligence towards the Defcon status, I hereby dub thee Defcon Dan. Congratulations.
In honor of you diligence towards the Defcon status, I hereby dub thee Defcon Dan. Congratulations.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 28 seconds later, 4 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,097,883
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,097,886
@previous (A)
I don't know, Dan. What is the reason for your interest in the Defcon status? Why such passion over if an UID can or cannot currently be created?
I don't know, Dan. What is the reason for your interest in the Defcon status? Why such passion over if an UID can or cannot currently be created?
(Edited 58 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 30 seconds later, 4 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,097,887
@1,097,883 (A)
Grover or a grover imfursonator came back and started using peoples' real first names so I had to permaban him. :(
Grover or a grover imfursonator came back and started using peoples' real first names so I had to permaban him. :(
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,097,912
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 50 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,097,925
@1,097,887 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Grover or a grover imfursonator came back and started using peoples' real first names so I had to permaban him. :(
It was Grover who came here. He claimed on TC that he was here posting. And when someone laughed at him and told him he was perma-banned, he said he wasn't because he just posted recently (or something to that extent).
> Grover or a grover imfursonator came back and started using peoples' real first names so I had to permaban him. :(
It was Grover who came here. He claimed on TC that he was here posting. And when someone laughed at him and told him he was perma-banned, he said he wasn't because he just posted recently (or something to that extent).
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,097,926
@previous (J)
Lol figures that the chomo is also an idiot. He is permabanned here. He can post here if he ban evades because it's hard to ban people effectively, but as soon as he posts his posts get deleted, he gets banned, and the board gets locked down a bit.
Lol figures that the chomo is also an idiot. He is permabanned here. He can post here if he ban evades because it's hard to ban people effectively, but as soon as he posts his posts get deleted, he gets banned, and the board gets locked down a bit.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 12 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,103
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,104
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
> Okay, Dan, we're back to Defcon 5. New UIDs can now be created!
Shall someone notify Grover?
> Okay, Dan, we're back to Defcon 5. New UIDs can now be created!
Shall someone notify Grover?
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,105
The Stalker doesn't like it when new accounts cannot be created.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,111
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,115
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,121
Syntax joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,158
@1,096,849 (E)> Lots of people here seem to be pedophiles based on what they post. Three specific men, who I won’t name right now, come to mind.
You can mention Bert - Because he is the most recent and is still cough cough Technically banned for Pedo content
One who I dare NOT mention because albeit HE lies to chili/tryptch about the past and says someone stole his password on multiple 4ums including one he owned -
If I say more about this it drives Killer Lettuce and Fake anon up the Wall - Killer Lettuce must be Catholic
Anyway thank for your reply as it made me smile
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,160
@previous (Syntax)
Oh Jesus. Not the namedropping again.
No, there isn't a rule against mentioning Matt's positively charming request to Triptych, so please don't go around saying that there is. It was just deleted in that case because it was derailing a thread.
Oh Jesus. Not the namedropping again.
No, there isn't a rule against mentioning Matt's positively charming request to Triptych, so please don't go around saying that there is. It was just deleted in that case because it was derailing a thread.
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,170
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
Awww, take it easy on the old goat. Maybe he had special permission to name-drop from a mod that he won't mention.
Awww, take it easy on the old goat. Maybe he had special permission to name-drop from a mod that he won't mention.
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,175
Nonsense post.(Edited 1 month later by a moderator.)
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,177
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,180
@previous (H)Reminds me - Market by those who dive for them is one nitemare traffic wise because you have to mix with those on way to or back from Airport
Can get them Live Live today and they were pulled fresh out at 6 AM today
They will even open them up for you on spot with a CLEAN Knife and have plastic spoons so you can dig in2 them while they roe is still wiggling around
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,186
@previous (Syntax)
Yeah I know it’s good. It’s best to find fresh out the shell the type that is normally sold in Japanese restaurants is treated with alum a gross chemical that makes it more solid
Yeah I know it’s good. It’s best to find fresh out the shell the type that is normally sold in Japanese restaurants is treated with alum a gross chemical that makes it more solid
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,188
@previous (H)Sushi places I go to have them still in shell and open rite b4 ones eyes
Probably because on this coast they are legal to dive for and just north of me where ninjj used to live - State of Calif encourages divers to dive for them and ship all over planet because these wonderful tasting critters are destroying the kelp so necessary.
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,190
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,268
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,371
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,373
All of you shut up about your dumb bullshit for a moment. Dan will need to use this thread quite soon.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,375
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,377
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 41 seconds later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,379
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,381
I swear to God, all of you need to fuck off with your Syntax autism. Dan NEEDS this thread!
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,382
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,383
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 21 seconds later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,384
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,387
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 51 seconds later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,389
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,391
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,420
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,442
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
It's the otherwise anonymous OP of this thread who seems very concerned about new account creation. KL bestowed him with a name earlier (@1,097,882 (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)) upthread. This would be easier to see without all the other drama clogging up the topic.
It's the otherwise anonymous OP of this thread who seems very concerned about new account creation. KL bestowed him with a name earlier (@1,097,882 (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)) upthread. This would be easier to see without all the other drama clogging up the topic.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,443
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,466
@1,097,926 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
This is another thing that creeps me out about him, the constant playing dumb. The last few bans, he's been caught pretty quickly. He must have seen at least one of those bans. Yet apparently he's saying that he posts here just fine.
Then there's the creepy, nonsensical stuff. "I can't be a pedophile. I work in an office". As if that's not an insane thing to say. Ugh.
That said, like you said, he's quickly dealt with each time he tries to return.
This is another thing that creeps me out about him, the constant playing dumb. The last few bans, he's been caught pretty quickly. He must have seen at least one of those bans. Yet apparently he's saying that he posts here just fine.
Then there's the creepy, nonsensical stuff. "I can't be a pedophile. I work in an office". As if that's not an insane thing to say. Ugh.
That said, like you said, he's quickly dealt with each time he tries to return.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
jodi !5dCsATIzDE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,477
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 59 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,486
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 16 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,098,671
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 day later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,099,121
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,099,148
@1,098,466 (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
He figured out I was the one who said I was reporting him for ban evasion and quickly attempted to leave me a gift on TC
Gift was quickly removed by Mod
He figured out I was the one who said I was reporting him for ban evasion and quickly attempted to leave me a gift on TC
Gift was quickly removed by Mod
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,099,161
I'm glad this never effects me
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,099,164
Any lockdowns in the near future should be blamed on rumors that the coronavirus has mutated to spread over the internet.