> If only Syntax was here to post the latest Biden polls
Sunday, February 2
Race/Topic (Click to Sort) Poll Results Spread
General Election: Trump vs. Biden NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl Biden 50, Trump 44 Biden +6
General Election: Trump vs. Sanders NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl Sanders 49, Trump 45 Sanders +4
General Election: Trump vs. Warren NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl Warren 48, Trump 45 Warren +3
General Election: Trump vs. Buttigieg NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl Trump 45, Buttigieg 46 Buttigieg +1
Thursday, January 30
Race/Topic (Click to Sort) Poll Results Spread
General Election: Trump vs. Biden LA Times/USC Biden 49, Trump 40 Biden +9
General Election: Trump vs. Sanders LA Times/USC Sanders 47, Trump 40 Sanders +7
General Election: Trump vs. Warren LA Times/USC Warren 45, Trump 41 Warren +4
General Election: Trump vs. Buttigieg LA Times/USC Trump 43, Buttigieg 40 Trump +3
General Election: Trump vs. Klobuchar LA Times/USC Klobuchar 42, Trump 40 Klobuchar +2
Shockin as it may B - Trump finally does beat a Dem in the Polls and that Dem is Pete Buttfucker.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,831
> The president of our glorious country regularly get triggered by political rivals calls them names on Twitter.
Never 4Get that President bragged about being a Pussy Grabber - and this photo says a lot about how Trump handles girls
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 19 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,840
@1,087,821 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
OP and many other MAGAers are imitating their dear leader in giving childish nicknames to political opponents. Because things like "decorum" and "manners" are tools of the liberal deep state. It is high time they were done away with!
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,841
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,899
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
but you don't need to bring that up when the president gets criticized for using juvenile nicknames constantly. it's juvenile and weird and he should be criticised for it. people aren't the president. i don't call him names, other high profile people don't call him names, etc. why do you always give weak 'but's when people say he does something lousy
the nickname thing feels especially low to me because you don't hear people speaking like that, ever. children, maybe, but not adults
it's gross
(Edited 25 seconds later.)
Syntax joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 25 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,908
@previous (jodi !ariasXXmaE) > i don't call him names,
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,909
@previous (Syntax)
i dont tho. ill say he's a shitty dude before I call him 'dick suckin donald' because I'm not 12
lol (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,910
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,914
@previous (lol)
And YOU 57 n will never make it to tyme to collect Social Security with picked Liver n Kidneys.
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,916
@1,087,909 (jodi !ariasXXmaE)
My liar reference was/is to how you call people here NAMES Nasty Names all the tyme
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,920
@1,087,896 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
No they do not, Kook. Throwing out such juvenile insults is not normal for a person in high office. Giving out nicknames like "rocket man", "crazy Hillary" or "McMuffin" is not at all normal for a President and I'm confused that you're acting like it is.
I can only conclude that you're either sympathetic to the guy, or just aren't very tuned in to how much stupid shit he's said.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,922
Watch Joes latest rally speaches, he can't string two sentences together. He's nearly incoherent.
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,923
@1,087,920 (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
You have to take into consideration the work she does for a living. Care givers of a group often gather around each other and make up names of clients and such names and Kook will confirm - Not exactly names anyone wants to be called.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 45 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,924
It's simultaneously amusing and depressing reading.
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,926
@1,087,922 (A)
You must have failed to view and listen to Trump's speech last night. He cannot even prounounce Sanctuary correctly and what is Covfefe?
Cum on tell us what the fuck is Covfefe!
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 35 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,927
> My liar reference was/is to how you call people here NAMES Nasty Names all the tyme
well maybe I call you names but this is an internet forum and you're a fag
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,928
@previous (jodi !ariasXXmaE)
Thank you for proving that you are just as much a Liar as Trump is.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,931
@1,087,899 (jodi !ariasXXmaE)
Because I see it as juvenile but nothing horrible. I especially don't care about giving bad people silly nicknames
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 6 years ago, 38 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,933
@1,087,920 (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
I see stupid things and yet I don't care
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,934
@1,087,931 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
hmmm... so everyone Trump disagrees with is a bad person?
jodi !ariasXXmaE double-posted this 6 years ago, 24 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,935
@1,087,933 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
but when it's Trump related you do seem to care enough to defend him mildly ?
(Edited 6 seconds later.)
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 3 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,936
@1,087,931 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
But even you must admit WE all expect the President of a country to show more respect for the population they Govern - And how often do your workmates makeup silly names of your clients.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 32 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,937
@1,087,935 (jodi !ariasXXmaE)
Because people go crazy over everything that he does and I'm like, really? Calm down
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 6 years ago, 26 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,938
@1,087,936 (Syntax)
Yes he isn't "presidential" at all
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 30 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,939
@1,087,937 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
saying something he does is wrong is hardly going crazy
aNoNyMoUs replied with this 6 years ago, 7 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,940
Which as it turns OUT - Is one reason Trump won the Electoral Vote - That portion of our US Population is in general poorly educated and they actually get off seeing Trump as an OUT of Order type of person. Makes them warm and fuzzy that the President has as poor an education as they do and I am not kidding.
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,087,990
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,088,181
@1,087,899 (jodi !ariasXXmaE) > it's juvenile and weird and he should be criticised for it.
I think this is the heart of the problem. He does need to be criticized for it. He should be held to some standard. Fuck knows every president was held to a much higher standard. The problem is that every time he is actually held to that standard people try to pretend like what he is doing is normal. Instead we get teary op-eds from millionaire pundits crying about people being so unfairly mean to Donald Trump. The fashion seems to be to pretend that any criticism arises, not from an objective assessment of the situation, but from from hatred of man himself.
If you can pretend that anyone who is criticizing him is just doing it out of spite, then you can effectively tune out anything you don't want to hear. Any criticism is anti-Trump propaganda that you can write off as spite or jealousy. That emotional appeal is really a key ingredient for any aspiring demagogue's campaign. It's the same doublethink that allows people like McConnell and Graham to refuse any testimony from Bolton on the grounds that he's a disgruntled ex-employee but still think a whistleblower's possible connection, however fleeting, to Biden or Clinton means that there must be a conspiracy brewing. It allows people to believe "alternative facts" they see spread around the internet and tune all the other shit out. It's the same kind of hypocrisy that allows people to see Hunter Biden having a job in international business as suspicious enough to cry nepotism and Trump's kids running the White House as normal.
So... The GOP picked the kid who clearly hasn't read the book to give the book report in front of the class. Should they be surprised when people call them out on it? No. Should they be surprised when people pretend like their outrage about being called out for it is silly. No. That's their boy Trump. They picked him. If they want someone who people won't complain about, then they should fix it. But they won't. They seem to be high on a feedback loop that they call "owning the libs" and I suspect they're probably going to continue doing it until shit collapses. At which point they'll pretend that they were, all along, the "nevertrumpers" that they are now complaining about so vociferously.