Topic: Official Iowa Caucus Draad
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU started this discussion 6 years ago #96,357
Please post all your insights and other comments itt.
(Edited 2 hours later.)
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,087,065
> undoing my fyne edit
(Edited 17 hours later.)
Pete joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 51 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,066
It doesn't even matter. It will funny if they fuck Bernie over again though.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,069
@1,087,065 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
:*
This is the first night when Bernard Sanders starts to become President.
@previous (Pete)
Pete! What are you doing here? Shouldn't you be out in Iowa?
:*
This is the first night when Bernard Sanders starts to become President.
@previous (Pete)
Pete! What are you doing here? Shouldn't you be out in Iowa?
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,076
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)> This is the first night when Bernard Sanders starts to become President.
Free things. ?
(Edited 17 hours later.)
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,078
Ah yes, the American Corbyn. Well, I hope he does better than his inspiration...
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,080
jodi !ariasXXmaE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 29 seconds later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,082
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 21 seconds later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,084
@1,087,078 (D)
Corbyn is the British Sanders tbh. He's more well liked than Corbyn.
@1,087,076 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Plucked from thin air but by SHEER WILLPOWER so it's sustainable.
Corbyn is the British Sanders tbh. He's more well liked than Corbyn.
@1,087,076 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Plucked from thin air but by SHEER WILLPOWER so it's sustainable.
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,087
?
(Edited 12 hours later.)
tteh !MemesToDNA double-posted this 6 years ago, 6 seconds later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,088
now excuse me while i quantitatively ease my debt ?
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 12 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,089
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 34 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,090
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,095
Don't push your mower over a cactus, unless you are wearing protective clothing. Thanks.
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 13 seconds later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,096
mm, and quantitive easing is the same as magic money... not a good understanding of bernies platform
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,099
@1,087,084 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Disagree. Sanders was inspired by Corbyn's success in the UK and decided to try socialism for himself. Much like with how the US steals British TV shows and Americanises them, many Americans are unaware that Sanders is an imitation of a superior British thing.
Disagree. Sanders was inspired by Corbyn's success in the UK and decided to try socialism for himself. Much like with how the US steals British TV shows and Americanises them, many Americans are unaware that Sanders is an imitation of a superior British thing.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,102
@1,087,095 (F)
???
@1,087,096 (G)
Bernie's platform doesn't matter because his domestic policy will be whatever he can bully Joe Manchin into voting for if he's lucky.
@previous (D)
Lol bud/bud bud.
???
@1,087,096 (G)
Bernie's platform doesn't matter because his domestic policy will be whatever he can bully Joe Manchin into voting for if he's lucky.
@previous (D)
Lol bud/bud bud.
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,103
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,104
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,106
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 30 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,128
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,130
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,131
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 28 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,132
@1,087,128 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I'm #1 Heck yeah (sunglasses emoji)
@1,087,130 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Factual
I'm #1 Heck yeah (sunglasses emoji)
@1,087,130 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Factual
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,134
@1,087,130 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
I'm fine with that. It avoids confusion because commas are used as decimal points in some places
I'm fine with that. It avoids confusion because commas are used as decimal points in some places
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,136
@1,087,131 (F)
> "Apostrophe"
Please use cromulent English: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/inverted_comma
> "Apostrophe"
Please use cromulent English: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/inverted_comma
tteh !MemesToDNA double-posted this 6 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,138
@1,087,134 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)Oh then I'll allow it!
my salary arrives like: 1,000,-'00 and I'll never get used to it
so many components to tear apart
(Edited 53 seconds later.)
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,139
@1,087,134 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
> I'm fine with that. It avoids confusion because commas are used as decimal points in some places
ugh. what planet
> I'm fine with that. It avoids confusion because commas are used as decimal points in some places
ugh. what planet
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,140
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,146
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,150
@1,087,139 (jodi !ariasXXmaE)
Europe. I see some francophones use it here too, so the apostrophe is least ambiguous imo (spaces are another option i dislike since they can make one number seem like two or more).
@1,087,138 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Ok that's weird! The apostrophe is used between pounds and pence? Like 32'52 is 32 pound 52 pence?
@1,087,132 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Oof
I still have $1'500 in loans ;_;
Europe. I see some francophones use it here too, so the apostrophe is least ambiguous imo (spaces are another option i dislike since they can make one number seem like two or more).
@1,087,138 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Ok that's weird! The apostrophe is used between pounds and pence? Like 32'52 is 32 pound 52 pence?
@1,087,132 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Oof
I still have $1'500 in loans ;_;
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,154
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Aww poor bb. You'll pay that off easily enough once you get steady work! I'm just about to go under $20k in debt though so I'll also pay mine off eventually.
Aww poor bb. You'll pay that off easily enough once you get steady work! I'm just about to go under $20k in debt though so I'll also pay mine off eventually.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,155
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
$20k? That's much less than I thought. I keep inflating your debt in my head. Once i stop being so friggin sick I'll be fine. Went to work today but went back home after lunch because pukey. Puking in the trench es no bueno. :(
$20k? That's much less than I thought. I keep inflating your debt in my head. Once i stop being so friggin sick I'll be fine. Went to work today but went back home after lunch because pukey. Puking in the trench es no bueno. :(
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 23 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,156
Wait who the FUCK edited my draad tteh you piece of human shit.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,157
@1,087,155 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Yeah it used to be $55k or so when I graduated but I've been paying down about $3-4k of the principal every year. I'll be debt free eventually!
Oh no you are still sick??? What do you think you have?
Yeah it used to be $55k or so when I graduated but I've been paying down about $3-4k of the principal every year. I'll be debt free eventually!
Oh no you are still sick??? What do you think you have?
(Edited 25 seconds later.)
Catherine !ttGirlsPl2 joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,163
Trump is winning, isn’t he?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,167
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,168
The results seem to be all over the place. Sanders might come out on top, or not. Buttigieg seems to be doing better than expected which sucks because he is the least interesting or qualified of all the candidates.
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,169
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,172
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 53 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,173
@1,087,169 (jodi !ariasXXmaE)
people regularly use commas in place of decimals here, i don't like the ambiguity
@1,087,157 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Well done!
Idk, less flu-y now more tummy issues :(
people regularly use commas in place of decimals here, i don't like the ambiguity
@1,087,157 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Well done!
Idk, less flu-y now more tummy issues :(
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,176
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 52 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,177
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,180
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,183
@1,087,176 (C)
I know! It fucking sucks i hate it!
@1,087,177 (jodi !ariasXXmaE)
But they do where i am which is much more relevant to my life than what people do where you are
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I don't know :(
I know! It fucking sucks i hate it!
@1,087,177 (jodi !ariasXXmaE)
But they do where i am which is much more relevant to my life than what people do where you are
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I don't know :(
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,193
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 54 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,195
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,199
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Oh fuck yeah. Be strategically sick and keep milking that hourly wage bud. The puking thing sucks though, you've gotta keep food down! Have you tried having just simple stuff like broth and crackers?
Oh fuck yeah. Be strategically sick and keep milking that hourly wage bud. The puking thing sucks though, you've gotta keep food down! Have you tried having just simple stuff like broth and crackers?
(Edited 38 seconds later.)
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,208
Sanders won a precinct by 20 points but now 5 candidates will get 1 delegate each.
Bernie supporters are getting a taste of socialism
Bernie supporters are getting a taste of socialism
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,209
@1,087,199 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
It comes and goes. I'm not eating much but i keep enough down to get by. Trying to keep it calorie dense so im eating a lot of nuts (ha ha)
It comes and goes. I'm not eating much but i keep enough down to get by. Trying to keep it calorie dense so im eating a lot of nuts (ha ha)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,218
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Ah geez that sucks. You seem to be taking care of yourself but there's only so much you can do I suppose. I will pray non-spiritually for you to get better.
Ah geez that sucks. You seem to be taking care of yourself but there's only so much you can do I suppose. I will pray non-spiritually for you to get better.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 56 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,219
@1,087,209 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I think your problems with decimal points may be behind the issue with you thinking you are a D cup...on an A cup frame.
I think your problems with decimal points may be behind the issue with you thinking you are a D cup...on an A cup frame.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,221
@previous (C)
Why do you think you know what my body looks like and how bra sizes work when you are so clearly ignorant of both of those things?
And I've taken three-dimensional calculus so don't act as if I'm some imbecile in maths
@1,087,218 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Thanks sweetheart :)
Why do you think you know what my body looks like and how bra sizes work when you are so clearly ignorant of both of those things?
And I've taken three-dimensional calculus so don't act as if I'm some imbecile in maths
@1,087,218 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Thanks sweetheart :)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,238
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,241
Update my friend whom works on one of the campaigns and is currently in Iowa says the results are delayed because of a problem with the app they were using to report votes (lol) and they will probably just have to manually turn them in somehow. What an absolute fucking mess. Use pen and paper for everything and hand count it like a sane fucking country.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) triple-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,244
https://twitter.com/ec_schneider/status/1224541947194417153
The whole system...largely broke. Fucking kill me.
On those technical difficulties...
"We are on paper in many cases," not the app, as was planned, said one Iowa Democrat. "The whole system largely broke."
"We are on paper in many cases," not the app, as was planned, said one Iowa Democrat. "The whole system largely broke."
The whole system...largely broke. Fucking kill me.
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,250
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 57 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,254
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,266
Dems running the Iowa caucus want to run your healthcare.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,268
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,280
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,282
@previous (F)
I had assumed it would be career professionals at the Department of Health and Human Services or something but apparently I was wrong and it's just a couple of people in Iowa. Go figure.
I had assumed it would be career professionals at the Department of Health and Human Services or something but apparently I was wrong and it's just a couple of people in Iowa. Go figure.
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,283
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,285
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,288
@1,087,183 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
> But they do where i am which is much more relevant to my life than what people do where you are
I'm taking about minichan
you are the only poster who uses messed up English and upside down commas
> But they do where i am which is much more relevant to my life than what people do where you are
I'm taking about minichan
you are the only poster who uses messed up English and upside down commas
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,290
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 59 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,292
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,306
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,318
@1,087,221 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Uhh 3 dimential maths is not bra sciencd bra protocol dear.
Uhh 3 dimential maths is not bra sciencd bra protocol dear.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,325
69th post.
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 31 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,345
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 58 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,348
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,350
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 30 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,351
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 57 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,366
@1,087,318 (C)
What the fuck do you know about bras. Last one you had in hands belongs to a very old lady. The only math you understand is what a pint is when full vs empty.
What the fuck do you know about bras. Last one you had in hands belongs to a very old lady. The only math you understand is what a pint is when full vs empty.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,367
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,372
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,374
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,375
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,376
Erik !jzYkdX7lIw joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 9 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,467
I want Warren and Sanders to be the front runners then have Warren to screw over Sanders only to lose to Trump. 2016 all over again. Fucking hilarious
Syntax joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 54 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,483
So the latest word is - People were given NO App training - Not that it wood have made any difference because the APP has coding errors.
I was soooo looking forward to C if Pete Buttfucker came out on top or bottom.
I was soooo looking forward to C if Pete Buttfucker came out on top or bottom.
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 58 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,510
@1,087,099 (D)
> Disagree. Sanders was inspired by Corbyn's success in the UK and decided to try socialism for himself. Much like with how the US steals British TV shows and Americanises them, many Americans are unaware that Sanders is an imitation of a superior British thing.
hes been doing this shit since the late 70's you goddamn fucking retard
> Disagree. Sanders was inspired by Corbyn's success in the UK and decided to try socialism for himself. Much like with how the US steals British TV shows and Americanises them, many Americans are unaware that Sanders is an imitation of a superior British thing.
hes been doing this shit since the late 70's you goddamn fucking retard
Anonymous P double-posted this 6 years ago, 29 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,511
@1,087,483 (Syntax)
> So the latest word is - People were given NO App training - Not that it wood have made any difference because the APP has coding errors.
>
> I was soooo looking forward to C if Pete Buttfucker came out on top or bottom.
die soon you old piece of faggot fucking shit, everyone hates you
> So the latest word is - People were given NO App training - Not that it wood have made any difference because the APP has coding errors.
>
> I was soooo looking forward to C if Pete Buttfucker came out on top or bottom.
die soon you old piece of faggot fucking shit, everyone hates you
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,516
@1,087,510 (P)
Nice job detecting a joke you useless retard. Gas yourself.
Nice job detecting a joke you useless retard. Gas yourself.
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,517
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 52 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,532
@1,087,511 (P)> die soon you old piece of faggot fucking shit, everyone hates you
There are in fact multiple examples on MC and you can find them with MC Search proving that there are many here that do not hate me and in fact in polls SUPPORTED Me!!!
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,536
When will they declare the cactus winner?
dreamworks joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,549
Erik !jzYkdX7lIw replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,550
Anonymous P replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,555
@1,087,532 (Syntax)
> >die soon you old piece of faggot fucking shit, everyone hates you
>
> There are in fact multiple examples on MC and you can find them with MC Search proving that there are many here that do not hate me and in fact in polls SUPPORTED Me!!!
is that why you got banned? everyone talks shit on you daily and has for decades, nobody likes you, not even as a joke. Are you too fucking retarded to realize that for the past 15 years the only thing anyone has ever done is make fun of you constantly?
> >die soon you old piece of faggot fucking shit, everyone hates you
>
> There are in fact multiple examples on MC and you can find them with MC Search proving that there are many here that do not hate me and in fact in polls SUPPORTED Me!!!
is that why you got banned? everyone talks shit on you daily and has for decades, nobody likes you, not even as a joke. Are you too fucking retarded to realize that for the past 15 years the only thing anyone has ever done is make fun of you constantly?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,560
@1,087,467 (Erik !jzYkdX7lIw)
Bernie wants to make her his VP. They'll fight now but in the end they're on the same side. That was not as true for Clinton and there was no pre-existing friendship between the two like there is with Warren/Sanders.
Bernie wants to make her his VP. They'll fight now but in the end they're on the same side. That was not as true for Clinton and there was no pre-existing friendship between the two like there is with Warren/Sanders.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 23 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,572
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 22 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,598
@1,087,560 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
but why is Warren dragging Sanders like she has been? It's off-putting to a lot of people who were on the fence I think. they wanna hear her talk shit about Trump not berni
but why is Warren dragging Sanders like she has been? It's off-putting to a lot of people who were on the fence I think. they wanna hear her talk shit about Trump not berni
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,602
@previous (jodi !ariasXXmaE)
She's clawing for first place and if you've gotta fight a little dirty, she'll do that. There's no voters to be gained by attacking Trump, everyone is in agreement that he sucks. She's gotta somehow standout as a progressive candidate and so she leaned into the woman angle. It seemed dumb at the time and felt grimy, but I guess she felt she had to do something to avoid being 3rd place. Probably won't have massive consequences I dont think.
She's clawing for first place and if you've gotta fight a little dirty, she'll do that. There's no voters to be gained by attacking Trump, everyone is in agreement that he sucks. She's gotta somehow standout as a progressive candidate and so she leaned into the woman angle. It seemed dumb at the time and felt grimy, but I guess she felt she had to do something to avoid being 3rd place. Probably won't have massive consequences I dont think.
Anonymous P replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,604
the only people that wouldn't vote for bernie are fags, are you a fag? feel the bern
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,606
Anonymous P replied with this 6 years ago, 38 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,618
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,619
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,647
Okay so I just saw some news about those preliminary results and I'm pretty mad hahaha. It's not one of the interesting candidates like the woman or Bernie, no, it's some guy named Pete Buttgig. The Democrats might be going into one of their most important elections ever with a candidate named Pete Buttgig? PETE. FUCKING. BUTTGIG?
(Edited 43 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,651
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,654
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)I'M FUCKING FURIOUS! BUTTGIG? PETE BUTTGIG! FUCKING PETE BUTTGIG!? WHAT, WAS JOHN ASSJOB TOO BUSY?! FUCKING CLOWNS!
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,656
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,659
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA BUTTGIG BUTTGIG! FUCKING BUTT! GIG!Anonymous D double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,662
Okay, I'm calm now.
I hope that he can rise to the occasion if he does win the nomination! The Democrats will certainly need a strong candidate!
I hope that he can rise to the occasion if he does win the nomination! The Democrats will certainly need a strong candidate!
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 second later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,663
@1,087,659 (D)
If it makes you feel any better he will likely lose the nomination, but it is quite funny atm.
If it makes you feel any better he will likely lose the nomination, but it is quite funny atm.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,676
Anonymous C double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,678
@previous (C)
> Looks like he won Iowa!! lolol
Youre right thats funny af!
> Looks like he won Iowa!! lolol
Youre right thats funny af!
(Edited 44 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 47 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,679
@1,087,676 (C)
Yes. He won the delegate count but lost the popular vote. He is unlikely to do well in NH or Nevada. He polls at literally zero percent among African-Americans. He will not win the Dem nomination.
Yes. He won the delegate count but lost the popular vote. He is unlikely to do well in NH or Nevada. He polls at literally zero percent among African-Americans. He will not win the Dem nomination.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,680
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 25 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,681
#mayorcheat or #cheaterpete
Really can't afford to split the vote between these two
Really can't afford to split the vote between these two
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,682
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,720
@1,087,679 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Lies. He had all six of his black supporters moved to the front row for his victory speech.
Lies. He had all six of his black supporters moved to the front row for his victory speech.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,724
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,727
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,732
@previous (J)
40%? If you're going to just wildly make up numbers just say like 312% of black voters would weep openly on the streets if Trump got a paper cut. I pulled a random recent YouGov poll and found 10% African-American approval. He got 8% of the African-American vote in 2016 so I'd say that seems about right. Somewhere in the 5-15% range would be about expected. But like I said, if you want to just make up numbers, don't do something modest like 40%. Go big or go home.
40%? If you're going to just wildly make up numbers just say like 312% of black voters would weep openly on the streets if Trump got a paper cut. I pulled a random recent YouGov poll and found 10% African-American approval. He got 8% of the African-American vote in 2016 so I'd say that seems about right. Somewhere in the 5-15% range would be about expected. But like I said, if you want to just make up numbers, don't do something modest like 40%. Go big or go home.
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,736
@1,087,662 (D)
> Okay, I'm calm now.
>
> I hope that he can rise to the occasion if he does win the nomination! The Democrats will certainly need a strong candidate!
butt gig is a joke
> Okay, I'm calm now.
>
> I hope that he can rise to the occasion if he does win the nomination! The Democrats will certainly need a strong candidate!
butt gig is a joke
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,769
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,773
I bet Fake Anon is votong for Bloomberg. ???
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,819
Elisabeth Warren lost her own countyFake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,873
@1,087,769 (J)
Rasmussen is a really shit pollster and I thought your whole ideology was that polls were totally unreliable anyway? God I love the intellectual consistency.
Rasmussen is a really shit pollster and I thought your whole ideology was that polls were totally unreliable anyway? God I love the intellectual consistency.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,878
@1,087,654 (D)
> I'M FUCKING FURIOUS! BUTTGIG? PETE BUTTGIG! FUCKING PETE BUTTGIG!? WHAT, WAS JOHN ASSJOB TOO BUSY?! FUCKING CLOWNS!
This charming lady had a similar reaction:
https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/eyn5ia/homophobic_caucus_goer_finds_out_pete_is_gay/
> I'M FUCKING FURIOUS! BUTTGIG? PETE BUTTGIG! FUCKING PETE BUTTGIG!? WHAT, WAS JOHN ASSJOB TOO BUSY?! FUCKING CLOWNS!
This charming lady had a similar reaction:
https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/comments/eyn5ia/homophobic_caucus_goer_finds_out_pete_is_gay/
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,879
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
I would like to clarify, Father, that I wa just having a bit of fun. His name is unusual but I'm sure he'd be a fine candidate regardless, and it's cool that a gay man has made it that far in proceedings.
...But that said, shouldn't you agree with that woman? I'm not a religious man, but I think the Bible's opinion on homosexuality is pretty clear.
I would like to clarify, Father, that I wa just having a bit of fun. His name is unusual but I'm sure he'd be a fine candidate regardless, and it's cool that a gay man has made it that far in proceedings.
...But that said, shouldn't you agree with that woman? I'm not a religious man, but I think the Bible's opinion on homosexuality is pretty clear.
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,898
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,961
@1,087,873 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)> Rasmussen is a really shit pollster and I thought your whole ideology was that polls were totally unreliable anyway? God I love the intellectual consistency.
You got me to hit Rasmussen to see what they are saying TODAY - Weird about accuracy because on thier Daily Pres tracking Poll
Now that Gallup has quit the field, Rasmussen Reports is the only nationally recognized public opinion firm that still tracks President Trump's job approval ratings on a daily basis.
EXCEPT I remember Microsoft and MSNBC doing exactly that so let me offer up this on Trump
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/daily-presidential-tracking-poll/ar-AADKLI1
Question is Do you Approve or Disapprove of the Job Donald Trump is doing as President?
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,087,977
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,062
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,067
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 59 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,110
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 22 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,282
@1,087,879 (D)
> I would like to clarify, Father, that I wa just having a bit of fun. His name is unusual but I'm sure he'd be a fine candidate regardless, and it's cool that a gay man has made it that far in proceedings.
> ...But that said, shouldn't you agree with that woman?
Absolutely and positively not.
> I'm not a religious man, but I think the Bible's opinion on homosexuality is pretty clear.
Not as clear as you might think to be honest (mentions of homosexuality are in the Old Testament, and some of us believe that Jesus was sent to deliver a new covenant).
The current Pope, Francis, has been trying to adopt a more enlightened approach to this subject. I confess that I am copying the following from Wikipedia:
"In April 2018 Pope Francis met with Juan Carlos Cruz, a survivor of sexual abuse by Chilean priest Fernando Karadima. Cruz discussed with Francis in detail how his sexual orientation was used by Latin American media and news outlets to discredit his report of abuse and label him as a pervert and liar. In a private conversation between the two, Francis said to Cruz, who identifies as homosexual, in regards to his sexuality, "You know Juan Carlos, that does not matter. God made you like this. God loves you like this. The Pope loves you like this and you should love yourself and not worry about what people say."
He has also said:
"If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge?"
So in brief, no, I do not agree with that woman.
Bless you for the question, friend.
> I would like to clarify, Father, that I wa just having a bit of fun. His name is unusual but I'm sure he'd be a fine candidate regardless, and it's cool that a gay man has made it that far in proceedings.
> ...But that said, shouldn't you agree with that woman?
Absolutely and positively not.
> I'm not a religious man, but I think the Bible's opinion on homosexuality is pretty clear.
Not as clear as you might think to be honest (mentions of homosexuality are in the Old Testament, and some of us believe that Jesus was sent to deliver a new covenant).
The current Pope, Francis, has been trying to adopt a more enlightened approach to this subject. I confess that I am copying the following from Wikipedia:
"In April 2018 Pope Francis met with Juan Carlos Cruz, a survivor of sexual abuse by Chilean priest Fernando Karadima. Cruz discussed with Francis in detail how his sexual orientation was used by Latin American media and news outlets to discredit his report of abuse and label him as a pervert and liar. In a private conversation between the two, Francis said to Cruz, who identifies as homosexual, in regards to his sexuality, "You know Juan Carlos, that does not matter. God made you like this. God loves you like this. The Pope loves you like this and you should love yourself and not worry about what people say."
He has also said:
"If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge?"
So in brief, no, I do not agree with that woman.
Bless you for the question, friend.
Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 44 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,298
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 7 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,491
How come everyone seems to be stroking Bernie Sanders’ dick now?
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 57 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,497
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,498
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,088,501
More like ButtiGAY amirite ?