Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 19 minutes later[^][v]#1,086,526
I bet crazy Nancy is taking this pretty hard...so the odds should be about even. I look forward to seeing her and the rest of the Dems grimace and frown as the true Patriots cheerfully applaud our innocent Hero while he basks in the glory of his exemplary performance.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,086,527
Why would anyone have an emotional reaction to this when the result is already certain? I mean whether you think Trump is the God Emperor or Hitler 2: Electric Boogaloo, are you really gonna be surprised at the outcome?
I've got to be about the hardest core Trump supporter on here, since the day he announced his candidacy, all the way through the 2016 election, I took Russia's side in the 2014 Crimea thing (and that was even before Trump!!!) and the Russiagate thing, hating Fake News since before it was cool, I mean I am a Trump supporter to the end. If Trump declared a revolution, I would join the Trump Militia and take up arms and personally throw commies and Buzzfeed/HuffPo/WaPo "journalists" out of helicopters myself. Yet even I can't get excited about this because we know the Republican senate will acquit him. Total snoozefest.
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 26 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,086,531
> So I’m just a spectacle to you? Also, that dick is long but the balls are small.
lmao
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,086,563
@OP
That video was fake. It was slowed down to make her speech seem slurred.
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 6 years ago, 55 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,086,571
@previous (E)
No scientific statement is 'perfectly valid' when it contains no scientific evidence. "Context of the information" presumably sounds impressive to you, but it's utterly meaningless here.
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,086,574
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
W-what? Did you mean to cite my post?
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 6 years ago, 6 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,086,645
@previous (E)
There were other results but blog sites can be perfectly valid if you learn how to discern the context of the information.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 23 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,086,648
Everclear is strong for such a lightweight wuss like bert, so he’s gonna be more drunk. At least he doesn’t have to worry about going into work hungover since he doesn’t have a job.