Topic: Big governmental and agency collaboration claims nCov more dangerous than SARS
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #96,279
The fatality rate is comparable to sars and the RO over 4, is higher than SARS.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.27.20018952v1.full.pdf
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.27.20018952v1.full.pdf
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,086,222
Nobody even remembers SARS though. That shit lasted like two weeks, 10 years ago. I'm not worried ?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,224
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
At least it's not peer reviewed yet. Also, you are being silly when you brush it away like nothing.
At least it's not peer reviewed yet. Also, you are being silly when you brush it away like nothing.
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,228
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,232
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 6 years ago, 58 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,233
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,235
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
The US just suspended entry into the states for people who could have the virus but it's a little too late. If you care about the us, you should be advocating Marshall law.
The US just suspended entry into the states for people who could have the virus but it's a little too late. If you care about the us, you should be advocating Marshall law.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 23 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,240
I wonder why the government wasn't on top this serious threat to the health of the nation. Ohhh that's right, they were busy wasting time on the bogus impeachment thing.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,241
@previous (C)
I believe that it leaked from the biological weapons lab in wuhan, and then it was secretly admitted to foreign governments but then it became about containing panic. It's time to panic though. Close all the borders everywhere.
I believe that it leaked from the biological weapons lab in wuhan, and then it was secretly admitted to foreign governments but then it became about containing panic. It's time to panic though. Close all the borders everywhere.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,242
@previous (A)
I believe that because of rumors of how they have found a sequence of hiv in the coronavirus. There also seems to be a common way of dying from the virus which is suddenly getting a lot worse and having your organs fail. That does sound similar to how hiv killed in the past, right? Or am I mistaken?
I believe that because of rumors of how they have found a sequence of hiv in the coronavirus. There also seems to be a common way of dying from the virus which is suddenly getting a lot worse and having your organs fail. That does sound similar to how hiv killed in the past, right? Or am I mistaken?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,246
Conspiracy theories are not a toy bud, grow up and leave.
@1,086,240 (C)
The CDC was heavily involved in the impeachment hearing? News to me.
@1,086,240 (C)
The CDC was heavily involved in the impeachment hearing? News to me.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,250
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
lol what do you think you are. Conspiracy theories are not a toy? Get over yourself.
lol what do you think you are. Conspiracy theories are not a toy? Get over yourself.
jodi !ariasXXmaE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,266
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 20 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,268
@previous (jodi !ariasXXmaE)
We gotta shut down everything!
Hardship today, virus free prosperity tomorrow.
We gotta shut down everything!
Hardship today, virus free prosperity tomorrow.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 50 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,277
@1,086,235 (A)
> you should be advocating Marshall law
> Marshall law
More like Martial LOL
@previous (A)
The medRxiv pdf you're citing is the result of a computer model working from early data. And it's really not that interesting. It's just some guys playing with a mathematical model and trying to make it fit the data. Even the part you cite in the OP where they mention an R higher than four, they then acknowledge that their estimate doesn't fit other estimates based on the data. It doesn't predict crazy mutations or confirm some HIV hybrid super virus. Seriously, you need to stop being Chicken Little and pretending every little piece of reporting is evidence for your weird doomsday fantasy.
> you should be advocating Marshall law
> Marshall law
More like Martial LOL
@previous (A)
The medRxiv pdf you're citing is the result of a computer model working from early data. And it's really not that interesting. It's just some guys playing with a mathematical model and trying to make it fit the data. Even the part you cite in the OP where they mention an R higher than four, they then acknowledge that their estimate doesn't fit other estimates based on the data. It doesn't predict crazy mutations or confirm some HIV hybrid super virus. Seriously, you need to stop being Chicken Little and pretending every little piece of reporting is evidence for your weird doomsday fantasy.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,285
@previous (F)
Yes i know it might not be 100% accurate and as I've said it's not peer reviewed but these are not nobodies that did that paper. The hiv part was also not from that paper and i never said it was, now it seems the part about the hiv is actually from a scientist in India.
Look, first someone here told me that I was making a big deal out of nothing and that the virus was contained, then the who declared it a global health emergency which means the situation is getting worse. There's no indication it's getting better. In fact, there's a video ob YouTube of a known journalist who is wanted by the Chinese government. In the video he's saying the hospitals are so full that they are turning away patients, that test kits are almost not available anymore.
There's also rumors of the Chinese army refusing to help after 300 of them got the virus. We are in a speculation period, i admit, but this lack of concern is outright stupid and i fear you'll see just how stupid it is in a few days.
Yes i know it might not be 100% accurate and as I've said it's not peer reviewed but these are not nobodies that did that paper. The hiv part was also not from that paper and i never said it was, now it seems the part about the hiv is actually from a scientist in India.
Look, first someone here told me that I was making a big deal out of nothing and that the virus was contained, then the who declared it a global health emergency which means the situation is getting worse. There's no indication it's getting better. In fact, there's a video ob YouTube of a known journalist who is wanted by the Chinese government. In the video he's saying the hospitals are so full that they are turning away patients, that test kits are almost not available anymore.
There's also rumors of the Chinese army refusing to help after 300 of them got the virus. We are in a speculation period, i admit, but this lack of concern is outright stupid and i fear you'll see just how stupid it is in a few days.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 56 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,290
People are wearing masks the wrong way, if they find any since there's such a shortage, not wearing protective eye wear and not using disposable gloves while also gathering together. It's madness.jodi !ariasXXmaE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,291
dreamworks joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 23 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,292
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,294
jodi !ariasXXmaE double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,295
@1,086,292 (dreamworks)
it's just like one of those ai generated conspiracy theory images that draws red boxes around random stuff
it's just like one of those ai generated conspiracy theory images that draws red boxes around random stuff
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,297
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,298
@previous (A)
Holy shit, they're not wearing hazmat suits either! I guess that picture means we're all fucked.
@1,086,285 (A)
Rumors of something something HIV. Rumors of something about the Chinese army. Nothing concrete, just "rumors" about other scary sounding stuff linked with this new scary thing. Doesn't repeating unfounded rumors strike you as irresponsible fear mongering?
I would think you would welcome news about WHO or the UN or the CDC taking measures against it. Wouldn't it be more worrisome if no one was taking it seriously? Isn't it better to hear that quarantines and screenings and shit are actually going on and that people are aware and prepared to react?
Holy shit, they're not wearing hazmat suits either! I guess that picture means we're all fucked.
@1,086,285 (A)
Rumors of something something HIV. Rumors of something about the Chinese army. Nothing concrete, just "rumors" about other scary sounding stuff linked with this new scary thing. Doesn't repeating unfounded rumors strike you as irresponsible fear mongering?
I would think you would welcome news about WHO or the UN or the CDC taking measures against it. Wouldn't it be more worrisome if no one was taking it seriously? Isn't it better to hear that quarantines and screenings and shit are actually going on and that people are aware and prepared to react?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,302
@previous (F)
It would have been better if the who never did react because there was never any reason to be worried, like i was told by some of you. There's a reason to worry now and taking interest in information that may not be correct is not "irresponsible fear mongering" especially since we are still in the speculation stage and the Chinese government has a history of silencing these sorts of things. Whatever is up your butt, stop blaming me for it. Thanks.
It would have been better if the who never did react because there was never any reason to be worried, like i was told by some of you. There's a reason to worry now and taking interest in information that may not be correct is not "irresponsible fear mongering" especially since we are still in the speculation stage and the Chinese government has a history of silencing these sorts of things. Whatever is up your butt, stop blaming me for it. Thanks.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,303
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 19 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,306
@previous (C)
That's kind of my point. People are being proactive. That should be comforting, not disturbing. Health organizations, governments, and individuals are taking it seriously without relying on internet rumors and hype.
That's kind of my point. People are being proactive. That should be comforting, not disturbing. Health organizations, governments, and individuals are taking it seriously without relying on internet rumors and hype.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,309
@previous (F)
My point that it's not enough of proactive measures. I see it in a lot of videos, people still aren't wearing something to cover their eyes but i suppose it actually is because there's not enough of them. We also should have closed all the borders asap. Like Madagascar in plague inc.
My point that it's not enough of proactive measures. I see it in a lot of videos, people still aren't wearing something to cover their eyes but i suppose it actually is because there's not enough of them. We also should have closed all the borders asap. Like Madagascar in plague inc.
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 7 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,086,380
@previous (A)
> My point that it's not enough of proactive measures. I see it in a lot of videos, people still aren't wearing something to cover their eyes but i suppose it actually is because there's not enough of them. We also should have closed all the borders asap. Like Madagascar in plague inc.
like plague inc
> My point that it's not enough of proactive measures. I see it in a lot of videos, people still aren't wearing something to cover their eyes but i suppose it actually is because there's not enough of them. We also should have closed all the borders asap. Like Madagascar in plague inc.
like plague inc