Topic: Coronovirus Death Count at 132 and climbing
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #96,211
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/29/world/asia/coronavirus-china.html
132 And thats just the ones they know about.
132 And thats just the ones they know about.
dreamworks joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 32 minutes later[^] [v] #1,085,354
Kitotpt
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,085,356
dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,085,357
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,085,370
And this is because Chinese people eat snakes and bats. Thanks, China.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,085,373
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,085,383
132 is nothing to sneeze at, but it's no measles
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,085,456
The mortality rate has fallen to 2.1%.?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,085,462
dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 54 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,085,463
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,085,466
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,085,468
@1,085,456 (F)
That's actually bad in terms of limiting the spread! If it had like a 20% mortality rate it would spread a lot slower because victims would just drop dead and not walk around sick all the time.
That's actually bad in terms of limiting the spread! If it had like a 20% mortality rate it would spread a lot slower because victims would just drop dead and not walk around sick all the time.
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,085,475
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
The figures OP is referring to reflect the epicenter of the outbreak, there have been no deaths outside of mainland China.
The figures OP is referring to reflect the epicenter of the outbreak, there have been no deaths outside of mainland China.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,085,477
@previous (F)
Yeah, though to be fair I bet the CCP is downplaying the numbers like crazy. I wouldn't be surprised if it was 10x as many infected as currently reported. We'll just wait and see.
Yeah, though to be fair I bet the CCP is downplaying the numbers like crazy. I wouldn't be surprised if it was 10x as many infected as currently reported. We'll just wait and see.
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 31 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,085,494
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
They definitely are, and it is making it harder for international health experts to help quell the outbreak. As long as the outbreak is kept within China, that only really effects china, considering the country is locked down.
They definitely are, and it is making it harder for international health experts to help quell the outbreak. As long as the outbreak is kept within China, that only really effects china, considering the country is locked down.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,085,496
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 55 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,085,506
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 53 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,085,528
itt: experts on China, despite never having been there