It be confirmed in the us of a though. In fact, the place of origin has around 50 thousand people travel from that city to the United States every year
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,083,403
Even then, the Wuhan CoV is killing people at a rate of 3%, many of those who died being elderly and/or suffering from other diseases. SARS had a higher mortality rate, even MERS had a higher mortality rate than the Wuhan CoV.
tteh !GETFUCKED joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,083,405
@previous (B)
A bit early to assume that mortality rate will be steady, though.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,083,406
If it comes down my way, I shall blow up the Tamar bridge. This shall completely isolate Cornwall from the outside world, saving us.
@previous (tteh !GETFUCKED)
You shall be my test for this. If you're infected, I'll know that the virus is close and I'll spring into action.
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,083,408
True, but tho it is a health emergency in China, the WHO has not declared it an international health emergency yet. Researchers are already trying to find an existing treatment for it, with others working to develop a new treatment for it. I think OP is being a bit overdramatic.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,083,409
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,083,411
If the entire world were infected and the mortality rate went unchanged, it would still only be 225,900,000. That would still leave 7,304,100,000 people alive.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,083,424
Aint that a outdated point of view though? Over population is the assumption that the population can only reach so-and-so levels before some kind of arbitrary limit is reached, but these limits, can't have solutions that increases them? For all we know, it's not the amount of population that is to blame for being unsustainable, rather it is perhaps our current ideological system.
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,083,428
Yeh but so many great things can come from pointless things. I bet the guy that invented the wheel was just having some pointless fun with square shaped rocks.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,083,435