Topic: Greta inspired Flight Shaming
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #95,643
To Syntax, who personally used his credit card to gas up Howard Hugh's jet, she would undoubtably say- HOW DARE YOU?!!
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 hours later[^] [v] #1,079,683
Syntax stole her childhood
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,700
Dreamworks joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,704
@previous (C)
i dont get all this type of criticism because the same point can be made about every well-fed person in the world
i dont get all this type of criticism because the same point can be made about every well-fed person in the world
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 59 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,705
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 27 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,706
Dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 43 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,707
@1,079,705 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
tbf i would have expected her not to use 4 SUPs in one meal also why is she grabbing butter with her hands
tbf i would have expected her not to use 4 SUPs in one meal also why is she grabbing butter with her hands
Dreamworks double-posted this 6 years ago, 15 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,709
Dreamworks triple-posted this 6 years ago, 29 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,710
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,712
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 11 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,713
@1,079,704 (Dreamworks)
Moreover, the people who post these are inevitably in favour populist right-wingers who support the rich and inequality. Like, it just seems like a bizarrely hypocritical thing.
Moreover, the people who post these are inevitably in favour populist right-wingers who support the rich and inequality. Like, it just seems like a bizarrely hypocritical thing.
Dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,715
@previous (F)
well i dont think the right wing generally are aware their policies support the rich and inequality
well i dont think the right wing generally are aware their policies support the rich and inequality
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,716
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 31 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,718
@1,079,715 (Dreamworks)
Okay, but even if that's true, people like Trump flaunt their wealth. You can't really be blind to that aspect of him.
Okay, but even if that's true, people like Trump flaunt their wealth. You can't really be blind to that aspect of him.
Anonymous F double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,719
@1,079,716 (C)
Talk to me with words instead of your image macros, you 'tard. That one wasn't even relevant anyway.
Talk to me with words instead of your image macros, you 'tard. That one wasn't even relevant anyway.
Dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 10 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,720
@1,079,718 (F)
yes but he is selling the idea that even a bert or a fake anon or even a becky could become that
yes but he is selling the idea that even a bert or a fake anon or even a becky could become that
Dreamworks double-posted this 6 years ago, 26 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,722
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,724
@1,079,720 (Dreamworks)
That's a fair point. I read an article once where some Trump supporters said they were against taxing the wealthy because one day they might be rich.
It's so sad. Some Americans are so poor that they can hardly eat or get much access to their helathcare system, but they'll still vote against taxing the rich.
That's a fair point. I read an article once where some Trump supporters said they were against taxing the wealthy because one day they might be rich.
It's so sad. Some Americans are so poor that they can hardly eat or get much access to their helathcare system, but they'll still vote against taxing the rich.
Erik !jzYkdX7lIw replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,725
@previous (F)
There are some really poor people who vote left wing and can stillnot afford to eat. How does that work out?
There are some really poor people who vote left wing and can stillnot afford to eat. How does that work out?
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,729
@previous (Erik !jzYkdX7lIw)
I'm not sure I should dignify that with a serious answer. Voting for someone doesn't mean that they win, or that they can fix everything even if they do.
I'm not sure I should dignify that with a serious answer. Voting for someone doesn't mean that they win, or that they can fix everything even if they do.
Erik !jzYkdX7lIw replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,730
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 29 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,747
What if someone found a way to turn plastic back into oil ?
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,748
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Put old water bottles in your car to power it. People would be litter picking in droves!
Put old water bottles in your car to power it. People would be litter picking in droves!
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,749
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,753
"There is no way Trump can win the election"
Dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 48 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,754
@1,079,730 (Erik !jzYkdX7lIw)
because the republicans are in favour of a legislation that creates poverty
because the republicans are in favour of a legislation that creates poverty
Dreamworks double-posted this 6 years ago, 37 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,756
Dreamworks triple-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,757
@1,079,724 (F)
for america specifically you have to bear in mind that they basically dont know any better. they think its fair (or at least normal) to pay several years wage to treat their moms cancer
for america specifically you have to bear in mind that they basically dont know any better. they think its fair (or at least normal) to pay several years wage to treat their moms cancer
Green !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,827
Green !StaYqkzUPc double-posted this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,828
@1,079,757 (Dreamworks)
You're thinking of polyethylene (PET 1) which contains BPA a potential carcinogen. Polypropylene (PP 5) does not leach toxic chemicals and it is safe to contain hot food and liquid.
You're thinking of polyethylene (PET 1) which contains BPA a potential carcinogen. Polypropylene (PP 5) does not leach toxic chemicals and it is safe to contain hot food and liquid.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,831
@1,079,707 (Dreamworks)
> tbf i would have expected her not to use 4 SUPs in one meal also why is she grabbing butter with her hands
She is not grabbing butter, you dummy. She doesn’t consume it.
> tbf i would have expected her not to use 4 SUPs in one meal also why is she grabbing butter with her hands
She is not grabbing butter, you dummy. She doesn’t consume it.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,839
Dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,842
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,849
Dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,850
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,854
Green !StaYqkzUPc replied with this 6 years ago, 6 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,873
KOOK (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,877
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,889
Dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,937
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,938
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,079,947
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,054
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,095
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Her dad and some dude in India have been posting everything on her Facebook page. Maybe it's them who aren't to be believed, and the whole thing is very deceptive.
Her dad and some dude in India have been posting everything on her Facebook page. Maybe it's them who aren't to be believed, and the whole thing is very deceptive.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,107
@1,080,054 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I believe most things that she says about herself could very well be fake. She is a manufactured figurehead
I believe most things that she says about herself could very well be fake. She is a manufactured figurehead
(Edited 11 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,109
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 10 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,110
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,122
jodi !ariasXXmaE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,123
@1,079,938 (L)
hmmmm I sometimes buy and refill large bottles in a pinch. sometimes fresh water is hard to come by. especially like, at Sea, for example
lol
hmmmm I sometimes buy and refill large bottles in a pinch. sometimes fresh water is hard to come by. especially like, at Sea, for example
lol
jodi !ariasXXmaE double-posted this 6 years ago, 45 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,124
@1,080,107 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I believe most things that she says about herself could very well be fake. She is a manufactured figurehead
do you know many teenagers? they are all like this and definitely not lying
> I believe most things that she says about herself could very well be fake. She is a manufactured figurehead
do you know many teenagers? they are all like this and definitely not lying
jodi !ariasXXmaE triple-posted this 6 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,126
@1,080,107 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
except maybe not in your 3rd world state. sorry. things are very different in Florida and I forget
except maybe not in your 3rd world state. sorry. things are very different in Florida and I forget
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,143
@previous (jodi !ariasXXmaE)
I don't understand this comment at all
I think that spokespeople for political causes are generally liars. Why should she be different?
I don't understand this comment at all
I think that spokespeople for political causes are generally liars. Why should she be different?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,144
@1,080,122 (O)
Is that so? I have no strong feelings about this autist girl, and that's not likely to change
Is that so? I have no strong feelings about this autist girl, and that's not likely to change
Anonymous O replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,148
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It's okay to just not know stuff. Pretending something is fake seems like a mentally lazy shortcut for people who want to feel like they've given something consideration.
It's okay to just not know stuff. Pretending something is fake seems like a mentally lazy shortcut for people who want to feel like they've given something consideration.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 10 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,246
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 41 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,250
@1,080,107 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Not consuming dairy isn't a particularly unusual or difficult thing...
Not consuming dairy isn't a particularly unusual or difficult thing...
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,255
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,259
@1,080,143 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I don't understand this comment at all
> I think that spokespeople for political causes are generally liars. Why should she be different?
I don't think climate science is political
> I don't understand this comment at all
> I think that spokespeople for political causes are generally liars. Why should she be different?
I don't think climate science is political
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 41 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,262
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 6 years ago, 27 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,263
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,284
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It's really not unusual. Loads of people are lactose intolerant or vegan or just plain don't like dairy.
It's really not unusual. Loads of people are lactose intolerant or vegan or just plain don't like dairy.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,288
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
I love ice cream but I would have to have a gun pointed at me to drink a glass of white milk.
I love ice cream but I would have to have a gun pointed at me to drink a glass of white milk.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,293
@1,080,284 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Yes this is true! Avoiding dairy isn't really that difficult especially if you are affluent/come from an affluent family like Greta does. Out of all the things to criticize her for this seems pretty weird to me.
Yes this is true! Avoiding dairy isn't really that difficult especially if you are affluent/come from an affluent family like Greta does. Out of all the things to criticize her for this seems pretty weird to me.
tteh !GETFUCKED replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,297
@1,080,284 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
It does, however, make you an objectively inferior person. ?
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
It does, however, make you an objectively inferior person. ?
tteh !GETFUCKED double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,298
Though I'll give Greta a pass. It's mostly just Fake anon I think sucks tbh. Lactose intolerant wanker.Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,299
Dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 17 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,538
@1,080,124 (jodi !ariasXXmaE)
how is "manufactured figurehead" not a strong feeling? dont pretend to be objective about an issue when you arent
how is "manufactured figurehead" not a strong feeling? dont pretend to be objective about an issue when you arent
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,540
Greta is boring.
Dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 5 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,542
Dreamworks double-posted this 6 years ago, 21 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,543
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,581
@1,080,538 (Dreamworks)
> how is "manufactured figurehead" not a strong feeling? dont pretend to be objective about an issue when you arent
I didn't say anything about feelings
> how is "manufactured figurehead" not a strong feeling? dont pretend to be objective about an issue when you arent
I didn't say anything about feelings
Dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,664
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,703
@1,080,538 (Dreamworks)
I didn't mean to be objective. I see her as a politician and I trust nothing they say
I didn't mean to be objective. I see her as a politician and I trust nothing they say
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 6 years ago, 40 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,704
Dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,706
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
i dont think it is very commonly known. what is your point? should every day things not be known?
i dont think it is very commonly known. what is your point? should every day things not be known?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,708
@previous (Dreamworks)
Why should it be commonly known if it isn't noteworthy? It's like a factoid that says she has once read a book
Why should it be commonly known if it isn't noteworthy? It's like a factoid that says she has once read a book
Dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,709
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Why should it be commonly known if it isn't noteworthy? It's like a factoid that says she has once read a book
it shouldnt and as far as i know isnt.
> Why should it be commonly known if it isn't noteworthy? It's like a factoid that says she has once read a book
it shouldnt and as far as i know isnt.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 24 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,710
@1,080,703 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
She's clearly an activist but I don't see how she's a politician. She's never held any elected office and isnt running for one. Unless you mean she is a prominent person with an agenda which I guess is true but doesn't make her a politician I don't think.
She's clearly an activist but I don't see how she's a politician. She's never held any elected office and isnt running for one. Unless you mean she is a prominent person with an agenda which I guess is true but doesn't make her a politician I don't think.
Dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,711
@1,080,703 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
what has she has said thats incorrect or untrustworthy? or are you just trying to give her a label so that you can rationalise not listening to the points she is trying to bring attention to
what has she has said thats incorrect or untrustworthy? or are you just trying to give her a label so that you can rationalise not listening to the points she is trying to bring attention to
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,714
@previous (Dreamworks)
I believe in climate change
I just see that they picked an underage, female, autist because those traits make her hard to criticise
I believe in climate change
I just see that they picked an underage, female, autist because those traits make her hard to criticise
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,715
@1,080,710 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I see most activists as being similar to politicians. Usually very privileged people with agendas
I see most activists as being similar to politicians. Usually very privileged people with agendas
Dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,717
@1,080,714 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
no they dont. if you think there is something wrong with something she said you can just explain what and why and it has nothing to do with these unnamed theys
no they dont. if you think there is something wrong with something she said you can just explain what and why and it has nothing to do with these unnamed theys
Dreamworks double-posted this 6 years ago, 20 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,718
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,719
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 6 years ago, 19 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,720
Dreamworks replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,819
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
no i think that that an activist has an agenda per definition. you seem to think having opinions you want to share as something negative
@1,080,719 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
ok great. when has she responded to a criticism about her ideas (as opposed to ad hominems) with excuses about her condition or age?
no i think that that an activist has an agenda per definition. you seem to think having opinions you want to share as something negative
@1,080,719 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
ok great. when has she responded to a criticism about her ideas (as opposed to ad hominems) with excuses about her condition or age?
Dreamworks double-posted this 6 years ago, 32 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,080,820
also if you want to debate against the climate crisis existing or whatever there is no need to mention her name at all like just make your point.