Peter replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,070,306
Also try Instagram op
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,070,402
Just don't smoke weed. That's what I do.
Peter replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,070,408
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
This man once flushed down €40 of weed down the toilet for no reason
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 40 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,070,410
@previous (Peter)
And I'd do it again cocklickers.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,070,411
@1,070,298 (A)
You'll have to pardon Kook. Last time Green went mucking about in the timeloops he bumped something out of alignment and Kook ended up with the sensibilities of someone born 100 years earlier than her.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,070,413
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,070,573
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It's still sex for money but st least you get to be choosy and fuck only clean, wealthy men.
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,070,574
@1,070,572 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I'm so imagining you as a 100+ year old lady who has nothing better to do than be judgmental about what "kids these days" get up to. I think you should raise some unrelated points about seedy pool halls and reefer madness to round out the thread.
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,070,576
> flushes drugs away even though he doesn't legally have to > dunks on outraged druggies that get mad at him for doing it
How can one man be this based?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,070,583
@1,070,574 (L)
The kids these days are not normally prostitutes. What the fuck
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,070,586
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
What does that even have to do with finding weed? You're so bizarre.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,070,596
@previous (L)
Because I was never against the weed, retard. So why even bring that up? I was playfully mocking him for throwing it away!
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,070,599
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Keep your bloomers on, granny.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,070,614
@previous (L)
Dont be petty because you fucked up your reading comprehension
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,070,623
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
My deary! Yer wound up tighter than a ball o' yarn today. Are you imaging people talking again?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,070,626
@previous (L)
Oh no, maybe someone is against smoking weed! Better defend your addiction at all costs!
(Edited 35 seconds later.)
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,070,631
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Will smoking a little of the devil's herb result in you making more sense?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,070,634
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,070,639
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Maybe if I start getting high I can follow along with you. Right now I'm obviously not high enough because you sound like you're all over the place.
(Edited 23 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,070,644
@previous (L)
Say what? You literally accused me of falsely having an anti weed bias! You've already had enough!
(Edited 7 minutes later.)
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,070,647
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I don't care how you feel about weed. I'm just laughing at you suggesting that black people know how to find drugs and shaming Fake Anon's exes out of the blue. I'm not sure what conversation you thought we were having. It's kind of fun to see what you'll accuse me of once you get all wound up though.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,070,650
@previous (L)
I accused you of exactly what you did
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,070,734
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I don't think I literally accused you of anything. You should accuse me of being amused more often. I had a little fun with it playing like you were old, true. You do remind me of a curmudgeonly old grandma sometimes. Given the topic of marijuana, I do find it funny how quickly your thoughts springboard to topics like blacks and prostitutes. If you ever release a freestyle rap album let me know. I would be fascinated to hear your train of thought play out in real time.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 14 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,070,867
@previous (L)
Actually you did
It may have been a mistake, but you definitely did
I forgive you
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 2 years later, 2 years after the original post[^][v]#1,174,234
It grows wild here.
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 years after the original post[^][v]#1,174,286
2022: Kook still bringing in a load of political baggage and stereotyped assumptions to every discussion. Going strong since at least 2010.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 20 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^][v]#1,174,296
Me an my gun club frens like ta go on down ta the crick and talk about q Anon stuffs after we have raging homosecksual sex in the Looseranna wilderness.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 years ago, 25 seconds later, 2 years after the original post[^][v]#1,174,394
Mitt Maller replied with this 4 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 years after the original post[^][v]#1,174,395
@previous (A)
Whom do you think you are referring to? Go on, say it.
Anonymous Q replied with this 4 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^][v]#1,174,399
@1,174,390 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
It's Anon Q, thanks.
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 4 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 years after the original post[^][v]#1,174,400
I mean, it is pretty fucked that nothing has been done to correct the punishment and or record of folks in the states where it's at least been decriminalized
Anonymous Q replied with this 4 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 years after the original post[^][v]#1,174,401
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Do you know many traffickers personally?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 4 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 years after the original post[^][v]#1,174,402
@1,174,390 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
What men will do is guess your opinion on something and argue against the thing you don't even think. And when you try to explain your real opinions, they don't believe you. It's called mansplaining
Anonymous O replied with this 4 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^][v]#1,174,404
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC) > guess your opinion
Which opinion are you referring to? Go on, say it.
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 4 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^][v]#1,174,407
@1,174,401 (Q)
I've known folks who had done trafficking of weed and people like 30-40 years ago cause they're old, but I don't know anyone who's a current illegal trafficker currently? Idk I got side tracked by traffic and trafficking
Dead !Pool..v42s double-posted this 4 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^][v]#1,174,412
@1,174,402 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I've noticed when it comes to arguments or debates the tactic ends up involving building a strawman of the argument, then tearing down the strawman as if that's where the other person is arguing from
Dead !Pool..v42s triple-posted this 4 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 years after the original post[^][v]#1,174,421
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s) @1,174,402 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I'm a fucking idiot and basically said what you just said
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 4 years ago, 37 seconds later, 2 years after the original post[^][v]#1,174,423