Topic: Syntax, a genuine question
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #94,509
If your life is, as you say, so happy, fulfilled, and filled with friends and activities, then why are you such an angry, miserable old stalker who spends 17+ hours a day on Minichan?
Syntax joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,068,698
@OPTime for me to hit 24 hour fitness - The thing is - Yes I am Older than anyone here - Yet I am ALIVE ALIVE ~O~
And the fact you cannot dispute is: Many here are in fact Young and Dispersed and even talk about Suicide. Many cannot even figure out what do do re work. Chili is a rare exception. Becky is busy chasing Ambulances but clearly not busy enough.
A few but very few are Living Life to the Fullest -
I dooooon't want to live any longer than the point where my HEALTH is NOT good and OR I cannot Surf - Dance - Hang with Friends - Still have functioning Penis for Girlfriends and Ex GF with Benefits which - er that wood be TMI
I am just saying - I B Super Super Happy Person - And sure the last weekend of December Nights where I was hugged and greeted by so many friends - Where my dancing skills still work good nuff for extra hugs from some very cute Gals who's name I will never No - And on occasion often just enough have a very cute Girl asking me for a dance
Sarah with "Will you please dance with me" I mean 23 and not a dancer but she could Follow MOST Purrrrrfect and she bought a Ticket for Gator by the Bay AND If I run in2 her I will not wait for her to ask me for a dance.
Nor is it about me wanting more from a 23 year old but the Hug at end of dance and She Hugged real nice - Those extra Pillows up front women have makes for nice hugs- TMI?
Live with Truth Justice and the American Way
ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM-------------------------------------------------------------------->
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,699
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,702
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)Yo TG Comix
Have you turned urself in2 Police for you horrid acts of Child Molestation Yet.
I notice the Pope is now helping keep Pedophile Priests and Bishops in the Church even after they have been convicted of crimes.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/02/sean-omalley-pope-francis-catholic-church-sex-abuse/582658/
Why Does the Catholic Church Keep Failing on Sexual Abuse?
Cardinal Seán O'Malley has spent decades cleaning up after pedophile priests. Now he's once again found himself in the middle of a crisis.
A few years after Seán O’Malley took over the Archdiocese of Boston in 2003, at the peak of the clergy sexual-abuse crisis in America, he led novenas of penance at nine of the city’s most affected parishes. At each church he visited, he lay facedown on the floor before the altar, begging for forgiveness. This is how O’Malley has spent his life in ministry: cleaning up after pedophile priests and their apologists, and serving as the Catholic Church’s public face of repentance and reform.
Possibly more than any other cleric on Earth, O’Malley understands how deeply the Church’s errors on sexual abuse have damaged its mission and reputation. Today, he is one of Pope Francis’s closest advisers, the only American on a small committee of cardinals who meet regularly at the Vatican. He runs the pope’s special commission on the protection of minors. And he is a member of the influential Vatican office responsible for preserving and defending Catholic doctrine. He believes that the Church has changed, can change, and will change. But as the world’s top bishops prepare to meet later this month for an unprecedented summit on sexual abuse at the Vatican, O’Malley has found himself frustrated, unable to push reforms through at the top.
In an interview on a recent cold morning in Boston, the cardinal spoke about the progress he believes the Church, and Pope Francis, have made in recent years, and what’s still lacking. He detailed his proposal to establish Vatican tribunals to deal with bishops accused of wrongdoing—one of the major problems the Church has yet to address. The pope “was convinced to do it another way,” O’Malley said. “We’re still waiting for the procedures to be clearly articulated.” He often described problems in the Church passively, without directly assigning agency or fault. For example: American bishops have asked the Vatican for an investigation into Theodore McCarrick, the former cardinal who was consistently elevated despite widely acknowledged rumors of sexual misconduct, until he was removed from ministry last summer. After months of requests, an investigation appears to be under way. “Certainly, many of us have personally expressed to the Holy Father and the secretary of state the need to do something quickly,” O’Malley said. “I keep getting assurances. But we’re waiting for the documents to be produced.”
O’Malley believes that the pope understands how important the issue of sexual abuse is: “His encounter with victims has made a very profound impact on his life and his ministry,” the cardinal said. And yet, the Church faces enormous structural and cultural barriers to establishing worldwide policies and procedures to deal with abuse, which O’Malley acknowledged. As for the meeting in February, “My worry is that the expectations in the United States are that this meeting is going to address all of our local concerns here,” he said, “which is not necessarily the case.”
The majority of known child sexual-abuse cases in the U.S. Catholic Church took place in the 1960s, ’70s, and ’80s. Major national news outlets began covering those stories by the early ’90s, around the time that O’Malley got assigned to his first troubled parish. The Boston Globe’s now famous Spotlight investigation in 2002 made it clear that clergy sexual abuse was endemic, and the cover-up extensive. Within months, the U.S. bishops’ conference had passed the first of a series of reforms that overhauled the way adults in Catholic spaces can interact with children.
But somehow, in terms of both technical reforms and moral reckoning, this issue remains unresolved. Nearly two decades after the Boston revelations, names of offenders and instances of abuse are still regularly being made public. It’s difficult to even know how many cases are still pending in the canon-law system, because the Vatican office in charge of overseeing sexual-abuse charges does not release those statistics. Some cases are known but haven’t been publicly acknowledged by the Church: Its disaggregated structure has enabled unevenness in how bishops address and publicize historical allegations of abuse. And a few Catholic leaders appear to have ignored or mishandled allegations, keeping accused clergy in ministry despite clear Church guidelines against that practice. Each time new revelations emerge, more survivors come forward: After a recent grand-jury report on the abuse was released in Pennsylvania, hundreds of people flooded a state clergy-abuse hotline with calls.
U Lie and say you cannot C images so let me tell you about the Image
Shows High Level Catholic Priests Bishops Cardinals etc Saying they WILL Not Report Child Abuse to Police because they approve of Child Abuse in the Church
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,703
@previous (Syntax)
> Yo TG Comix
> Have you turned urself in2 Police for you horrid acts of Child Molestation Yet.
>
> I notice the Pope is now helping keep Pedophile Priests and Bishops in the Church even after they have been convicted of crimes.
>
> https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/02/sean-omalley-pope-francis-catholic-church-sex-abuse/582658/
>
>
> Why Does the Catholic Church Keep Failing on Sexual Abuse?
>
> Cardinal Seán O'Malley has spent decades cleaning up after pedophile priests. Now he's once again found himself in the middle of a crisis.
>
>
> A few years after Seán O’Malley took over the Archdiocese of Boston in 2003, at the peak of the clergy sexual-abuse crisis in America, he led novenas of penance at nine of the city’s most affected parishes. At each church he visited, he lay facedown on the floor before the altar, begging for forgiveness. This is how O’Malley has spent his life in ministry: cleaning up after pedophile priests and their apologists, and serving as the Catholic Church’s public face of repentance and reform.
>
> Possibly more than any other cleric on Earth, O’Malley understands how deeply the Church’s errors on sexual abuse have damaged its mission and reputation. Today, he is one of Pope Francis’s closest advisers, the only American on a small committee of cardinals who meet regularly at the Vatican. He runs the pope’s special commission on the protection of minors. And he is a member of the influential Vatican office responsible for preserving and defending Catholic doctrine. He believes that the Church has changed, can change, and will change. But as the world’s top bishops prepare to meet later this month for an unprecedented summit on sexual abuse at the Vatican, O’Malley has found himself frustrated, unable to push reforms through at the top.
>
> In an interview on a recent cold morning in Boston, the cardinal spoke about the progress he believes the Church, and Pope Francis, have made in recent years, and what’s still lacking. He detailed his proposal to establish Vatican tribunals to deal with bishops accused of wrongdoing—one of the major problems the Church has yet to address. The pope “was convinced to do it another way,” O’Malley said. “We’re still waiting for the procedures to be clearly articulated.” He often described problems in the Church passively, without directly assigning agency or fault. For example: American bishops have asked the Vatican for an investigation into Theodore McCarrick, the former cardinal who was consistently elevated despite widely acknowledged rumors of sexual misconduct, until he was removed from ministry last summer. After months of requests, an investigation appears to be under way. “Certainly, many of us have personally expressed to the Holy Father and the secretary of state the need to do something quickly,” O’Malley said. “I keep getting assurances. But we’re waiting for the documents to be produced.”
>
> O’Malley believes that the pope understands how important the issue of sexual abuse is: “His encounter with victims has made a very profound impact on his life and his ministry,” the cardinal said. And yet, the Church faces enormous structural and cultural barriers to establishing worldwide policies and procedures to deal with abuse, which O’Malley acknowledged. As for the meeting in February, “My worry is that the expectations in the United States are that this meeting is going to address all of our local concerns here,” he said, “which is not necessarily the case.”
>
> The majority of known child sexual-abuse cases in the U.S. Catholic Church took place in the 1960s, ’70s, and ’80s. Major national news outlets began covering those stories by the early ’90s, around the time that O’Malley got assigned to his first troubled parish. The Boston Globe’s now famous Spotlight investigation in 2002 made it clear that clergy sexual abuse was endemic, and the cover-up extensive. Within months, the U.S. bishops’ conference had passed the first of a series of reforms that overhauled the way adults in Catholic spaces can interact with children.
>
> But somehow, in terms of both technical reforms and moral reckoning, this issue remains unresolved. Nearly two decades after the Boston revelations, names of offenders and instances of abuse are still regularly being made public. It’s difficult to even know how many cases are still pending in the canon-law system, because the Vatican office in charge of overseeing sexual-abuse charges does not release those statistics. Some cases are known but haven’t been publicly acknowledged by the Church: Its disaggregated structure has enabled unevenness in how bishops address and publicize historical allegations of abuse. And a few Catholic leaders appear to have ignored or mishandled allegations, keeping accused clergy in ministry despite clear Church guidelines against that practice. Each time new revelations emerge, more survivors come forward: After a recent grand-jury report on the abuse was released in Pennsylvania, hundreds of people flooded a state clergy-abuse hotline with calls.
>
> U Lie and say you cannot C images so let me tell you about the Image
>
> Shows High Level Catholic Priests Bishops Cardinals etc Saying they WILL Not Report Child Abuse to Police because they approve of Child Abuse in the Church
You appear to be losing your marbles, old man. You wrote the exact same thing yesterday, and as is your custom, dodged the reply:
http://minichan.org/topic/94467#reply_1068419
> Yo TG Comix
> Have you turned urself in2 Police for you horrid acts of Child Molestation Yet.
>
> I notice the Pope is now helping keep Pedophile Priests and Bishops in the Church even after they have been convicted of crimes.
>
> https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/02/sean-omalley-pope-francis-catholic-church-sex-abuse/582658/
>
>
> Why Does the Catholic Church Keep Failing on Sexual Abuse?
>
> Cardinal Seán O'Malley has spent decades cleaning up after pedophile priests. Now he's once again found himself in the middle of a crisis.
>
>
> A few years after Seán O’Malley took over the Archdiocese of Boston in 2003, at the peak of the clergy sexual-abuse crisis in America, he led novenas of penance at nine of the city’s most affected parishes. At each church he visited, he lay facedown on the floor before the altar, begging for forgiveness. This is how O’Malley has spent his life in ministry: cleaning up after pedophile priests and their apologists, and serving as the Catholic Church’s public face of repentance and reform.
>
> Possibly more than any other cleric on Earth, O’Malley understands how deeply the Church’s errors on sexual abuse have damaged its mission and reputation. Today, he is one of Pope Francis’s closest advisers, the only American on a small committee of cardinals who meet regularly at the Vatican. He runs the pope’s special commission on the protection of minors. And he is a member of the influential Vatican office responsible for preserving and defending Catholic doctrine. He believes that the Church has changed, can change, and will change. But as the world’s top bishops prepare to meet later this month for an unprecedented summit on sexual abuse at the Vatican, O’Malley has found himself frustrated, unable to push reforms through at the top.
>
> In an interview on a recent cold morning in Boston, the cardinal spoke about the progress he believes the Church, and Pope Francis, have made in recent years, and what’s still lacking. He detailed his proposal to establish Vatican tribunals to deal with bishops accused of wrongdoing—one of the major problems the Church has yet to address. The pope “was convinced to do it another way,” O’Malley said. “We’re still waiting for the procedures to be clearly articulated.” He often described problems in the Church passively, without directly assigning agency or fault. For example: American bishops have asked the Vatican for an investigation into Theodore McCarrick, the former cardinal who was consistently elevated despite widely acknowledged rumors of sexual misconduct, until he was removed from ministry last summer. After months of requests, an investigation appears to be under way. “Certainly, many of us have personally expressed to the Holy Father and the secretary of state the need to do something quickly,” O’Malley said. “I keep getting assurances. But we’re waiting for the documents to be produced.”
>
> O’Malley believes that the pope understands how important the issue of sexual abuse is: “His encounter with victims has made a very profound impact on his life and his ministry,” the cardinal said. And yet, the Church faces enormous structural and cultural barriers to establishing worldwide policies and procedures to deal with abuse, which O’Malley acknowledged. As for the meeting in February, “My worry is that the expectations in the United States are that this meeting is going to address all of our local concerns here,” he said, “which is not necessarily the case.”
>
> The majority of known child sexual-abuse cases in the U.S. Catholic Church took place in the 1960s, ’70s, and ’80s. Major national news outlets began covering those stories by the early ’90s, around the time that O’Malley got assigned to his first troubled parish. The Boston Globe’s now famous Spotlight investigation in 2002 made it clear that clergy sexual abuse was endemic, and the cover-up extensive. Within months, the U.S. bishops’ conference had passed the first of a series of reforms that overhauled the way adults in Catholic spaces can interact with children.
>
> But somehow, in terms of both technical reforms and moral reckoning, this issue remains unresolved. Nearly two decades after the Boston revelations, names of offenders and instances of abuse are still regularly being made public. It’s difficult to even know how many cases are still pending in the canon-law system, because the Vatican office in charge of overseeing sexual-abuse charges does not release those statistics. Some cases are known but haven’t been publicly acknowledged by the Church: Its disaggregated structure has enabled unevenness in how bishops address and publicize historical allegations of abuse. And a few Catholic leaders appear to have ignored or mishandled allegations, keeping accused clergy in ministry despite clear Church guidelines against that practice. Each time new revelations emerge, more survivors come forward: After a recent grand-jury report on the abuse was released in Pennsylvania, hundreds of people flooded a state clergy-abuse hotline with calls.
>
> U Lie and say you cannot C images so let me tell you about the Image
>
> Shows High Level Catholic Priests Bishops Cardinals etc Saying they WILL Not Report Child Abuse to Police because they approve of Child Abuse in the Church
You appear to be losing your marbles, old man. You wrote the exact same thing yesterday, and as is your custom, dodged the reply:
http://minichan.org/topic/94467#reply_1068419
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,704
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)Best you continue to keep your LDL high HDL low and more quickly help local undertakers pay their bills.
And welcome to the clueless here that failed to take
<-------------
No need to read what I rite - Just read the links instead of crappy conclusions about nit picking about one Number that MAY be OF Much Value and Often IS!
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,705
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,706
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Currently the Royal Family is reported to be downsizing because a Prince pulled a TG-Comix re underage molestation.
This Christmas eve with the Royal Family will probably be somewhat Somber.
Currently the Royal Family is reported to be downsizing because a Prince pulled a TG-Comix re underage molestation.
This Christmas eve with the Royal Family will probably be somewhat Somber.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,707
@previous (Syntax)
> Currently the Royal Family is reported to be downsizing because a Prince pulled a TG-Comix re underage molestation.
> This Christmas eve with the Royal Family will probably be somewhat Somber.
Said a confused old man in response to apparently nobody.
> Currently the Royal Family is reported to be downsizing because a Prince pulled a TG-Comix re underage molestation.
> This Christmas eve with the Royal Family will probably be somewhat Somber.
Said a confused old man in response to apparently nobody.
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,709
Damn Merrin-Comix must be busy buggering kids or he cannot cum up with a simple reply.
Perhaps his FAKE Priest Schick is not so much so good anymore - Naw he like Matt cannot get past Shtick
Time to Boogie to Kaboo for closing day/nite
C ya all 2Morrow and any Clone of Syntax I am sure will do what they do.
ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM-------------------------------------------------------------------->
Perhaps his FAKE Priest Schick is not so much so good anymore - Naw he like Matt cannot get past Shtick
Time to Boogie to Kaboo for closing day/nite
C ya all 2Morrow and any Clone of Syntax I am sure will do what they do.
ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM-------------------------------------------------------------------->
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,710
@previous (Syntax)
> Damn Merrin-Comix must be busy buggering kids or he cannot cum up with a simple reply.
> Perhaps his FAKE Priest Schick is not so much so good anymore - Naw he like Matt cannot get past Shtick
>
> Time to Boogie to Kaboo for closing day/nite
>
> C ya all 2Morrow and any Clone of Syntax I am sure will do what they do.
>
> ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM-------------------------------------------------------------------->
Continued the confused old man, still ranting at apparently nobody.
> Damn Merrin-Comix must be busy buggering kids or he cannot cum up with a simple reply.
> Perhaps his FAKE Priest Schick is not so much so good anymore - Naw he like Matt cannot get past Shtick
>
> Time to Boogie to Kaboo for closing day/nite
>
> C ya all 2Morrow and any Clone of Syntax I am sure will do what they do.
>
> ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM-------------------------------------------------------------------->
Continued the confused old man, still ranting at apparently nobody.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,720
You can not live life to the fullest and spend as much time typing walls of drivel out in this place. Sorry Syntax but you are so full of shit I can smell you here on the east coast. You have lived on forums for years. You write more words in one post than most of the peeps here write in a month. You are so addicted to this life when you are told no more family flames you run to TC and start ripping into Matt and Bert's family just to get it out of your system and on a forum wall. You might think you are pulling the wool over people's eyes here and maybe a few are to dense to get it but for the most part your living life to the fullest is nothing but BS. And besides anyone who has the time to make up 314 UIDs can't squeeze in time for much of a life. Get real you old fucker. Many here see it. You yourself said most of the people on here are fucked up and you old man are right in the middle of it all, with mucho information on anyone who has posted here in the last 8 years...NOBODY can have much of a life and keep and store that much information unless they live it. Now zoom away to your make believe worlds outside minichan lmfao
Syntax joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 37 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,725
Syntax double-posted this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,728
@OP> If your life is, as you say, so happy, fulfilled, and filled with friends and activities, then why are you such an angry, miserable old stalker who spends 17+ hours a day on Minichan?
Now OP - I C you set up a topic just for me and just 2 minutes later Clones appear as if by Magic
Ur 17 hours gets all fucked up with this for instance
https://minichan.org/topic/94501
Syntax (OP) replied with this 5 hours ago, 30 minutes
So until just now 5 hours and 30 minutes ago I was out and about enjoying Real Life
And you can find my first post of the day late in the Morning or waz it Noon+
So again I NO Believe you did a Topic and just 2 minutes later a pile of Clone posts appear with copypasta it ceems
Syntax triple-posted this 6 years ago, 33 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,729
Oh now Y y Y? U think I am angry?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 54 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,738
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 45 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,744
@previous (A)I do NOT stalk
And Notice Matt has made dozens many more dozens of NEW Topic about Me and Me? Not One Nada Zilch Zip Zero
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,745
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,748
@previous (F)
I may on occasion show some degree of curiosity. I may even do some research or advanced research
Let me tell you about the tyme becky was doing deep research on me - Wood you call that stalking? Not Thee Thy or eye
I may on occasion show some degree of curiosity. I may even do some research or advanced research
Let me tell you about the tyme becky was doing deep research on me - Wood you call that stalking? Not Thee Thy or eye
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 36 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,749
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,750
@previous (F)You have the distinct text speak odor of the one who was thrilled to get Hole n Lung in China and favored food no other expat wood eat.
Ya no the Pedophile of MC that competes with TG-Comix for Pedo #1
Must fully admit to doing some fyne research on such a Cockroach of MC
Say if you R how is the search for investors for this
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,789
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,798
@1,068,748 (Syntax)
> I may on occasion show some degree of curiosity. I may even do some research or advanced research
Looking up people on Google and finding out info about them, or their family, on a daily basis, is stalking. Thanks.
> I may on occasion show some degree of curiosity. I may even do some research or advanced research
Looking up people on Google and finding out info about them, or their family, on a daily basis, is stalking. Thanks.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,845
@1,068,748 (Syntax)
becky looked up your criminal record huh? Is that where the story about you exposing yourself in public came from?
becky looked up your criminal record huh? Is that where the story about you exposing yourself in public came from?
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 28 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,859
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,864
@1,068,798 (G)> > I may on occasion show some degree of curiosity. I may even do some research or advanced research
>
> Looking up people on Google and finding out info about them, or their family, on a daily basis, is stalking. Thanks.
You should go to work for Trump
Syntax double-posted this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,866
@1,068,845 (H)
No she kept asking me questions about a Org I used to represent in official capacity Then she started to ask to many detailed questions and at that point I said this ceems somewhat fishy 2Me so I Miss~led her on purpose - Not to long ago I detailed how and Y I miss~led her to another Mod and included Proof that in fact I held an official capacity and received the highest award which they only honor one person a year.
She just got to pushy and she does have Lexus Nexus which does allow far more deep research with sometimes amazing results - Alas my Cousin a Local Attorney with nice law office and Staff NO longer let me abuse Lexus Nexus - Of course when necessary givin I have keys to office - Nuff said
No she kept asking me questions about a Org I used to represent in official capacity Then she started to ask to many detailed questions and at that point I said this ceems somewhat fishy 2Me so I Miss~led her on purpose - Not to long ago I detailed how and Y I miss~led her to another Mod and included Proof that in fact I held an official capacity and received the highest award which they only honor one person a year.
She just got to pushy and she does have Lexus Nexus which does allow far more deep research with sometimes amazing results - Alas my Cousin a Local Attorney with nice law office and Staff NO longer let me abuse Lexus Nexus - Of course when necessary givin I have keys to office - Nuff said
Syn5ax replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,869
@1,068,864 (Syntax)
Sarah with "Will you please dance with me" I mean 23 and not a dancer but she could Follow MOST Purrrrrfect and she bought a Ticket for Gator by the Bay AND If I run in2 her I will not wait for her to ask me for a dance.
Nor is it about me wanting more from a 23 year old but the Hug at end of dance and She Hugged real nice -
Sarah with "Will you please dance with me" I mean 23 and not a dancer but she could Follow MOST Purrrrrfect and she bought a Ticket for Gator by the Bay AND If I run in2 her I will not wait for her to ask me for a dance.
Nor is it about me wanting more from a 23 year old but the Hug at end of dance and She Hugged real nice -
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,878
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,883
@1,068,866 (Syntax)
> I held an official capacity and received the highest award which they only honor one person a year.
Those McDonald's Employee of the Year certificates aren't something to be proud of.
> I held an official capacity and received the highest award which they only honor one person a year.
Those McDonald's Employee of the Year certificates aren't something to be proud of.
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,068,997
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Point is - Use of multiple devices - ID's - What a few here call UID's or even IUD's that actually allow entry without doing anything Other than prevention of an Invention While at the same tyme allowing entry for fun and play without fear of Invention Nor the possibility of having to fund a Harvard Med School education.
You used the example of Robbed As IF I were doing something Wrong!!!
Given I am doing just the opposite and the fact is based on one Mods PM to me IF they are Correct - Then every Mod does as I do - And they even get an extra special freebee tool that others pay for - Alas even I tried that tool and found it Crap - But hey they get to even Vote multiple times IF they wanted2
Not saying they Do but for sure it wood be easy for them to Do
Point is - Use of multiple devices - ID's - What a few here call UID's or even IUD's that actually allow entry without doing anything Other than prevention of an Invention While at the same tyme allowing entry for fun and play without fear of Invention Nor the possibility of having to fund a Harvard Med School education.
You used the example of Robbed As IF I were doing something Wrong!!!
Given I am doing just the opposite and the fact is based on one Mods PM to me IF they are Correct - Then every Mod does as I do - And they even get an extra special freebee tool that others pay for - Alas even I tried that tool and found it Crap - But hey they get to even Vote multiple times IF they wanted2
Not saying they Do but for sure it wood be easy for them to Do