Topic: Man-caused climate change is a hoax!
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #93,798
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 17 minutes later[^] [v] #1,061,424
For all their insistence that Donald Trump is corrupt, it is his opponents who are willing to pervert reality to get what they want. They deserve every bad thing that happens to them.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,061,434
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 28 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,061,445
Because Science has never been shown to be wrong
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,061,467
idk I mean Jeff looks like a pretty chill guy
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,061,468
Jeff looks confident. Those 2 scientists look confused as fuck about whatever it is they're looking at. I know who I trust.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 16 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,061,469
@1,061,467 (tteh !MemesToDNA)
Yeah. Jeff looking cool and friendly undermines the image just a little. That bottom image needed to be a fat guy shouting and firing a gun, or something.
Yeah. Jeff looking cool and friendly undermines the image just a little. That bottom image needed to be a fat guy shouting and firing a gun, or something.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,061,470
Why would a climate scientist be in a lab coat holding a conical flask with some mysterious blue chemical in it? I would expect them to be depicted, say, launching a weather balloon or at least doing something that's even remotely connected to climate science. How do you know Jeff doesn't have a PhD in ichthyology?
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,061,471
@previous (F)
They're not even wearing safety goggles despite clearly having no fucking idea what's in that flask. Jeff on the other hand is sensibly shielding his eyes from the sun's harmful effects.
They're not even wearing safety goggles despite clearly having no fucking idea what's in that flask. Jeff on the other hand is sensibly shielding his eyes from the sun's harmful effects.
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,061,491
@1,061,445 (B)
> Because Science has never been shown to be wrong
science was invented to be capable of being shown to be wrong on purpose -- a self-correcting feature
On the other hand, the King James Bible is the inerrant word of the Lord God Himself and is solid as Truth can ever be
> Because Science has never been shown to be wrong
science was invented to be capable of being shown to be wrong on purpose -- a self-correcting feature
On the other hand, the King James Bible is the inerrant word of the Lord God Himself and is solid as Truth can ever be
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 8 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,061,608
What exactly does staring at a flask full of blue liquid have to do with climate change? ?
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,061,654
@1,061,491 (Sheila LaBoof)
When it becomes evident that a significant portion of the population doesn't give a shit about scientific hypotheses or falsifiability and is completely comfortable with an explanation of the world that amounts to "because magic" then you would think we would be smart enough to realize that we need to start pushing for an interpretation of the inerrant word of God that emphasizes responsible stewardship of our earthly domain that God has entrusted to us. Setting the two principles, science and religion, at opposite ends of the spectrum by implying or acknowledging arguments that imply that those two methods of thinking come to different and mutually exclusive answers is counterproductive.
Really, people have used religious ideas to justify their actions, no matter how noble or insane, for all of human history and comfortably lived out their lives believing they were right. Getting people behind the self-evident good of not dooming their progeny to a harsh existence by irrevocably damaging the balance of life on Earth shouldn't be a hard sell.
When it becomes evident that a significant portion of the population doesn't give a shit about scientific hypotheses or falsifiability and is completely comfortable with an explanation of the world that amounts to "because magic" then you would think we would be smart enough to realize that we need to start pushing for an interpretation of the inerrant word of God that emphasizes responsible stewardship of our earthly domain that God has entrusted to us. Setting the two principles, science and religion, at opposite ends of the spectrum by implying or acknowledging arguments that imply that those two methods of thinking come to different and mutually exclusive answers is counterproductive.
Really, people have used religious ideas to justify their actions, no matter how noble or insane, for all of human history and comfortably lived out their lives believing they were right. Getting people behind the self-evident good of not dooming their progeny to a harsh existence by irrevocably damaging the balance of life on Earth shouldn't be a hard sell.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,061,655
to be on the safe side, burnt offerings of our finest youths should be given to appease the unseen master of us all
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,061,657
@previous (Sheila LaBoof)I was thinking of something more along the lines of "I shall care for God's creation which was entrusted to me" type stuff with pictures of ducklings or some shit.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,061,662
@1,061,654 (I)
I would say that the last thing earth needs is another side that thinks its all better than the other sides.
I would say that the last thing earth needs is another side that thinks its all better than the other sides.