Topic: Text files can not be child porn damnit...

Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #9,374

Why are people so stupid?

Poll option	Votes	Percentage
Agree	6	29%
Disagree	7	33%
Sup to4str?	8	38%

!ocurburUbk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #166,242

Why is child pornography so over discussed here...-.-

Foxygen !FXYGNx1XR. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #166,245

@previous (!ocurburUbk)
And why are puppies so under-discussed?

!ocurburUbk replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #166,246

@previous (Foxygen !FXYGNx1XR.)
The world better not be flat.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #166,250

@166,242 (!ocurburUbk)
Actually, I'm talking about something that is clearly NOT child porn.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #166,253

@OP
lol no CP for you

Nega !34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #166,256

Boring.
Give some details; don't just drop a random sentence.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #166,260

@previous (Nega !34Kas0OdzM)
In some countries people can be prosecuted for having text files describing child-sex.

I think this is wrong.

motherfucking !xHGARYoak6 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #166,261

thought crame
man i would wan 2 fap 2 CP.....

Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #166,263

@166,260 (A)
Okie dokie.

(Edited 41 seconds later.)

swamplights !!V3J448+/B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #166,264

@166,260 (A)
Any links about this?

protip !!pMmAiEwOm joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,310

> endless obsession

jump joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,311

Tell a policeman, so he knows.

ltamake !!onnLC5KY8 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,394

sup to4str

Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,395

@OP
Damn government, why can't they just let you wank to little boys in peace, right? They're clearly evil.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,397

@166,394 (ltamake !!onnLC5KY8)
Smells like Bitcoins.

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,398

I would say it depends on how graphic it is. I am reminded of that one book that Amazon pulled which was basically a 'Pedophile's Guide' vs. what sort of literary value the novel Lolita has.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 19 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,399

@166,264 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Have you heard of Karen Fletcher? She was a mentally ill woman, an abuse survivor herself, who was convicted of writing fictional stories about children. Five years of probation (she plead guilty; with a trial she was facing 30 years in prison). Zero victims.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,402

@previous (L)
I haven't but I'll research her right now. Thanks.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,404

@166,399 (L)
My god, her story is truly tragic.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 7 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,814

@166,395 (D)
It's thought crime. The start of a very slippery slope.

Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,817

@previous (A)
Yep, it's Bitcoins.

jump replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,827

The real crime is the discrimination against children.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,829

@166,817 (D)
:')

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,831

@166,814 (A)
Was this in the news recently?
Or do you just like to keep up on International child pornography law for fun?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,834

If I find what YOU jerk off to to be distasteful, even though nobody is getting hurt, should I be able to convict you of a crime?

There is not one logical explanation as to why text files describing sex with children should be illegal. There is not one study to show that these types of stories increase the likelihood of sexually offending. In fact, the evidence shows that having an outlet that doesn't hurt anybody can PREVENT sex crimes from occurring.

I'm right and so far nobody has given any valid argument otherwise.
Vote 'disagree' all you like, but you're doing so for emotional reasons, not logical ones.

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 31 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,835

@166,831 (M)
> Was this in the news recently?
> Or do you just like to keep up on International child pornography law in preparation for the inevitable?
ftfy

dreamworks !AUIkTW/L46 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 47 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,836

@166,834 (A)
nobody explicitly disagreed, they just dont give a fuck about the 700th topic about this

jump replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,839

@166,834 (A)
Yea. Since when are laws made to prevent crime? It's to have a reason to lock up people we don't like.

Anonymous K replied with this 15 years ago, 12 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,840

@166,834 (A)
Fuck, this makes me angry just to read.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,844

@166,839 (jump)
In my opinion it's just outdated law that hasn't caught up with the internet yet. I actually believe CP laws will become a lot more relaxed in the future.

@previous (K)
Angry because you agree or disagree with what I'm saying?

Anonymous D replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,845

@previous (A)
> CP laws will become more relaxed
You wish.

Anonymous K replied with this 15 years ago, 57 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,848

@166,844 (A)
Angry because I disagree and don't have the time or patience to type out a legitimate reply as to why I think what you're saying is bullshit.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,850

@previous (K)
so I'm just to believe you have a valid reason that you can't be bothered typing? I'm sure you could explain it in less words than that message you just typed.

It appears I have more reason to call what YOU'RE saying bullshit right now.

Seriously, any valid reason you think you might have can be summarised in a few words. Try it.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 59 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,852

@166,836 (dreamworks !AUIkTW/L46)

> nobody explicitly disagreed, they just dont give a fuck about the 700th topic about this

protip !!pMmAiEwOm double-posted this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,853

@166,850 (A)
Why are you upset, tonight? What didnâ€™t go well, today?

Anonymous K replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,864

@166,850 (A)
I tried earlier to promote some discussion but with you I know it's not happening. You're simply looking for somebody to argue with or to wholly agree with you so I can't be bothered to put up with your nonsense.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,871

@previous (K)
> every single thread from Bitcoins

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,875

@166,853 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
I'm not upset, I just have a strong opinion about this.

@166,864 (K)
Why isn't it happening with? I'm not looking to argue, I'm looking to debate. Why is this nonsense? Because I have a different opinion? I'll be very receptive to your opinions, if only you would share them. This is what a forum is for, I believe.

Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,888

@166,834 (A)
Fuck off TGcomix. Nobody wants to hear how you jizz over child porn stories.

Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,906

Personally, I couldn't give less of a fuck either way, so I'm a neutral party. Now here's a completely unbiased assessment.

Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #166,934

you can rename files from video extention to a text extension so hai durr toaster

Minichan