Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later[^][v]#1,060,255
The liberals cried because they had no arguments and Trump laughed at them on Twitter. There, is that what you wanted to hear?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,060,256
Yes, of course.
Near the beginning Nunes pointed out the important fact that even before the Zolensky phone call happened, 5 of the Democrats on the committee had already voted to impeach Trump. They have been trying to find a way to get rid of him since the day he was elected. As we all know, the phone call is just an excuse.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,060,264
@previous (C)
"Your honor, the FBI has been trying to convict my client, an honorable, philanthropic businessman for well over a decade, accusing him of all kinds of heinous crimes up to and including murder, but all they've been able to pin on him is a trumped-up gun charge and alleged tax evasion."
-Al Capone's attorney, probably
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,060,269
Oh, and Schiff was so butthurt that the first phone call transcript was read out for the whole world to hear that he repeatedly refused points of order.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,060,270
@previous (C)
Based Schiff making cuckservatives mad with that BDE.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,060,272
I like the part where Democrats claim that hearsay is better evidence than direct evidence
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,060,274
@previous (E)
Okay, so I guess misusing "hearsay" has become the latest manoeuvre for you guys?
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,060,280
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
Ask Mike Quigley
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 48 seconds later, 46 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,060,281
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,060,300
"Heresay can be much better evidence than direct, as we have learned in painful instances, and it's certainly valid in this instance."
- Rep. Mike Quigley, Democrat, Illinois, 5th District
q. replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,060,303
I feel like climate inaction is an even more important ground for impeachment than this stuff. high crime maybe.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,060,305