Topic: Another USAmerica mass shooting today
Inbred Toothless Hillbilly started this discussion 6 years ago #93,643
As always, remember that is is completely, totally, 100% unrelated to guns. Thanks.
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later[^] [v] #1,059,986
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,093
Did the gun shoot the people, or did someone hold the gun and shoot the people?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,094
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,095
Baltimore is like a continuous mass shooting if you think about it ?
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 38 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,096
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,130
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,132
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,133
@previous (C)
I'm pretty sure it was the gun that shot people, unless USAmericans have developed the ability to fire bullets from their hands.
I'm pretty sure it was the gun that shot people, unless USAmericans have developed the ability to fire bullets from their hands.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,134
@previous (E)
Did the gun just get up and shoot people by itself, or did someone hold the gun, and pull the trigger?
Did the gun just get up and shoot people by itself, or did someone hold the gun, and pull the trigger?
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,136
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,137
@1,060,134 (C)
> Did the gun just get up and shoot people by itself, or did someone hold the gun, and pull the trigger?
Answer this question: what does a washing machine do?
> Did the gun just get up and shoot people by itself, or did someone hold the gun, and pull the trigger?
Answer this question: what does a washing machine do?
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,139
@1,060,136 (E)
So the person operating the gun shot the people?
@previous (F)
Please don't tell me a washing machine kills people too.....
So the person operating the gun shot the people?
@previous (F)
Please don't tell me a washing machine kills people too.....
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,141
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,143
@1,060,132 (C)
> Technically, the gun didn't shoot anyone. The person shot those people.
there's such a thing as pedantry to the point of absurdity
> Technically, the gun didn't shoot anyone. The person shot those people.
there's such a thing as pedantry to the point of absurdity
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,181
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,182
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 41 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,184
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,186
@1,060,181 (C)
> So without a person holding the gun, the gun jumped up and shot people?
OK, now you are pretty much saying that people can't be trusted with guns
> So without a person holding the gun, the gun jumped up and shot people?
OK, now you are pretty much saying that people can't be trusted with guns
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,187
If guns don't kill people, then why would you need one for self defense? ?
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,196
@1,060,184 (E)
But you said the gun shot the people. How did the gun shoot the people by itself?
@1,060,182 (H)
>
You seem upset snowflake.
@1,060,186 (Sheila LaBoof)
I didn't say people couldn't be trusted. I'm saying the gun can't shoot itself.
But you said the gun shot the people. How did the gun shoot the people by itself?
@1,060,182 (H)
>
shut the fuck up
You seem upset snowflake.
@1,060,186 (Sheila LaBoof)
I didn't say people couldn't be trusted. I'm saying the gun can't shoot itself.
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,197
So it's back to this obsession about how it is or isn't guns, right? That's what it always turns into.
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 31 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,198
@1,060,139 (C)
> Please don't tell me a washing machine kills people too.....
www.metro.co.uk/2018/06/27/boy-3-dies-getting-locked-washing-machine-playing-hide-seek-7665055/amp/
You're not very bright are you?
> Please don't tell me a washing machine kills people too.....
www.metro.co.uk/2018/06/27/boy-3-dies-getting-locked-washing-machine-playing-hide-seek-7665055/amp/
You're not very bright are you?
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,202
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 30 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,204
@previous (E)
and it got into a school
and someone who had it shouldn't have
but it's not about guns
and it got into a school
and someone who had it shouldn't have
but it's not about guns
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,250
@previous (K)
Are you implying gun laws and gun free zones are easily ignored by criminals and crazy people?
Are you implying gun laws and gun free zones are easily ignored by criminals and crazy people?
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,251
@previous (L)
> Are you implying gun laws and gun free zones are easily ignored by criminals and crazy people?
Kind of like murder, theft and rape laws are. Maybe we should scrap those too, since crazy psychopaths don't care about them.
> Are you implying gun laws and gun free zones are easily ignored by criminals and crazy people?
Kind of like murder, theft and rape laws are. Maybe we should scrap those too, since crazy psychopaths don't care about them.
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,258
> I didn't say people couldn't be trusted. I'm saying the gun can't shoot itself.
Also cyanide can't poison itself
lots of things can't achieve their human-imposed purposes
Also cyanide can't poison itself
lots of things can't achieve their human-imposed purposes
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,262
Sheila LaBoof replied with this 6 years ago, 28 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,277
@previous (L)
I'm saying it's really silly to point out responsibility and try to use that as rationale to freely allow unlimited access, when it actually achieves the opposite point: people in the aggregate aren't demonstrating that it is safe for them to have free unlimited access.
I'm saying it's really silly to point out responsibility and try to use that as rationale to freely allow unlimited access, when it actually achieves the opposite point: people in the aggregate aren't demonstrating that it is safe for them to have free unlimited access.
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,284
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,289
@1,060,250 (L)
no i also don't think it's impossible to restrict access to guns and i don't think 'craziness' is the issue
no i also don't think it's impossible to restrict access to guns and i don't think 'craziness' is the issue
Anonymous L replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,292
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,304
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 14 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,481
Everytime it's exactly the same, Jesus.
Mr. Augustine David joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,498
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,501
Just do a 'War on guns'
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,518
@1,060,498 (Mr. Augustine David)
The point is, when the gun is sitting there with no one touching it, does it open fire and shoot people?
No. So therefore, it's not the gun killing people, it's people killing people.
So stop blaming guns for your stupidity.
The point is, when the gun is sitting there with no one touching it, does it open fire and shoot people?
No. So therefore, it's not the gun killing people, it's people killing people.
So stop blaming guns for your stupidity.
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,532
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 37 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,540
Anonymous O replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,542
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,543
Anonymous O replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,545
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,546
Anonymous O replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,548
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,549
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,553
@1,060,540 (E)
> I'm pretty sure it's a person killing a person by using a gun.
And there we have it. It's not the gun doing the killing. It's the people killing people by using the gun.
Class dismissed.
> I'm pretty sure it's a person killing a person by using a gun.
And there we have it. It's not the gun doing the killing. It's the people killing people by using the gun.
Class dismissed.
Anonymous O replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,554
@1,060,549 (E)
Ok, so a person should use a knife or a bomb to kill other people to make you feel better. No guns though right? Guns are bad?
Ok, so a person should use a knife or a bomb to kill other people to make you feel better. No guns though right? Guns are bad?
Mr. Augustine David replied with this 6 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,561
Mr. Augustine David double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,562
@1,060,553 (C)
@1,060,553 (C)
So maybe ban those killing implements because people have been shooting at each other for a while over there
@1,060,553 (C)
So maybe ban those killing implements because people have been shooting at each other for a while over there
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,565
@1,060,553 (C)
> > I'm pretty sure it's a person killing a person by using a gun.
>
> And there we have it. It's not the gun doing the killing. It's the people killing people by using the gun.
>
> Class dismissed.
i read a t shirt at a county Fair one time too
> > I'm pretty sure it's a person killing a person by using a gun.
>
> And there we have it. It's not the gun doing the killing. It's the people killing people by using the gun.
>
> Class dismissed.
i read a t shirt at a county Fair one time too
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 46 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,600
Anonymous O replied with this 6 years ago, 57 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,630
@1,060,561 (Mr. Augustine David)
You don't think it's the bombs themselves that are placing themselves and exploding themselves, do you?
You don't think it's the bombs themselves that are placing themselves and exploding themselves, do you?
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 28 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,638
Mr. Augustine David replied with this 6 years ago, 39 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,654
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,687
Anonymous O replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,690
@1,060,654 (Mr. Augustine David)
Idk, swedish bombs. Do you think inanimate objects are commiting crimes?
Idk, swedish bombs. Do you think inanimate objects are commiting crimes?
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,691
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 57 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,692
Anonymous C double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,693
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,695
Anonymous P replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,696
@1,060,518 (C)
> when the gun is sitting there with no one touching it, does it open fire and shoot people?
Landmines can sit in the ground for years and still kill people. Would it be OK to stockpile landmines and seed the ground surrounding your home with them? If someone died as a result, you could argue in court that they killed themselves by stepping on it, because landmines usually don't go off without a person "touching" it.
> when the gun is sitting there with no one touching it, does it open fire and shoot people?
Landmines can sit in the ground for years and still kill people. Would it be OK to stockpile landmines and seed the ground surrounding your home with them? If someone died as a result, you could argue in court that they killed themselves by stepping on it, because landmines usually don't go off without a person "touching" it.
Anonymous P double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,698
@1,060,693 (C)
> Did the gun shoot the people, or did someone hold the gun and shoot the people?
The gun shot the people and the person(s) holding the gun shot the people. Thanks, thanks.
> Did the gun shoot the people, or did someone hold the gun and shoot the people?
The gun shot the people and the person(s) holding the gun shot the people. Thanks, thanks.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,700
@1,060,696 (P)
Check your reading comprehension. We are taking about guns. Not landmines.
@previous (P)
> The gun shot the people and the person(s) holding the gun shot the people. Thanks, thanks.
So without a person holding the gun, the gun is useless, correct?
Check your reading comprehension. We are taking about guns. Not landmines.
@previous (P)
> The gun shot the people and the person(s) holding the gun shot the people. Thanks, thanks.
So without a person holding the gun, the gun is useless, correct?
Anonymous N replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,702
Consider this:
There have been cases where a gun shot and killed people without someone holding it and pulling the trigger
There have been cases where a gun shot and killed people without someone holding it and pulling the trigger
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 25 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,703
@1,060,700 (C)
So what you're saying is that we should not ban guns, but instead ban people from having guns?
So what you're saying is that we should not ban guns, but instead ban people from having guns?
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,704
@previous (E)
> So what you're saying is that we should not ban guns, but instead ban people from having guns?
Did I say that?
Sounds like your argument is slipping.
> So what you're saying is that we should not ban guns, but instead ban people from having guns?
Did I say that?
Sounds like your argument is slipping.
Anonymous C double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,706
@1,060,702 (N)
> Consider this:
>
> There have been cases where a gun shot and killed people without someone holding it and pulling the trigger
So while it was sitting on a table, it said, "Oh look, a nigger. I'mma shoot him.", And jumped up and shot him?
> Consider this:
>
> There have been cases where a gun shot and killed people without someone holding it and pulling the trigger
So while it was sitting on a table, it said, "Oh look, a nigger. I'mma shoot him.", And jumped up and shot him?
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,707
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,711
@previous (E)
> Your argument is that its not the gun that is the problem, its the people, right?
Your argument is the gun shot the person, not someone shot someone else.
You're basically blaming the gun for the killings, right?
> Your argument is that its not the gun that is the problem, its the people, right?
Your argument is the gun shot the person, not someone shot someone else.
You're basically blaming the gun for the killings, right?
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,713
@previous (C)
No my argument is that both the person fired the gun and the gun shot the person. You really have some trouble with this, don't you?
No my argument is that both the person fired the gun and the gun shot the person. You really have some trouble with this, don't you?
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 45 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,722
@previous (E)
But without the person, the gun would not have shot the other person. You aren't very bright are you?
But without the person, the gun would not have shot the other person. You aren't very bright are you?
Anonymous P replied with this 6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,729
@1,060,700 (C)
> We are taking about guns. Not landmines.
So, you're incapable of understanding simple analogies. Thanks.
@1,060,713 (E)
> So while it was sitting on a table, it said, "Oh look, a nigger. I'mma shoot him.", And jumped up and shot him?
If the gun falls off the table and discharges into the body of a nearby person, it has shot them. You're both autistic borderline retarded, aren't you?
@1,060,713 (E)
> both the person fired the gun and the gun shot the person.
Truth.
And yes, he has enormous trouble comprehending this.
> We are taking about guns. Not landmines.
So, you're incapable of understanding simple analogies. Thanks.
@1,060,713 (E)
> So while it was sitting on a table, it said, "Oh look, a nigger. I'mma shoot him.", And jumped up and shot him?
If the gun falls off the table and discharges into the body of a nearby person, it has shot them. You're both autistic borderline retarded, aren't you?
@1,060,713 (E)
> both the person fired the gun and the gun shot the person.
Truth.
And yes, he has enormous trouble comprehending this.
Anonymous P double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,730
@1,060,722 (C)
A loaded weapon can shoot a human being without anyone pulling the trigger. Thanks, thanks. Thanks.
A loaded weapon can shoot a human being without anyone pulling the trigger. Thanks, thanks. Thanks.
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,735
@previous (P)
> A loaded weapon can shoot a human being without anyone pulling the trigger. Thanks, thanks. Thanks.
So the California school shooting was caused by a gun that fired without a human touching it? Hmmmm, interesting...
> A loaded weapon can shoot a human being without anyone pulling the trigger. Thanks, thanks. Thanks.
So the California school shooting was caused by a gun that fired without a human touching it? Hmmmm, interesting...
Mr. Augustine David replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,060,779
@1,060,690 (O)
what?? I think people are committing mass murders and they should probably ban the weapons they use. I guess it depends on if you find the freedom to own a gun more important than the freedom to not die from gunfire
what?? I think people are committing mass murders and they should probably ban the weapons they use. I guess it depends on if you find the freedom to own a gun more important than the freedom to not die from gunfire