Topic: OMG I just deduced something!!
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #93,596
The person behind the Father Merrin persona is one of the mods!! OMG!
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 47 seconds later[^] [v] #1,059,456
You got me, buster
Father TTEH !GETFUCKED joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,059,457
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,059,460
What a preposterous notion.
jodi !ariasXXmaE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,059,492
Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,059,550
Sheila LaBoof double-posted this 6 years ago, 51 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,059,551
Mother Farrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 28 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,059,555
@OP
> OMG I just deduced something!!
Probably not.
I think, in all probability, that you actually derived that conclusion by way of inductive reasoning, where a series of examples or premises are viewed as supplying some evidence for the truth of the conclusion. If you had deduced that, you would have had to reach a reductive conclusion by working from general rules to show that they hold true for this particular conclusion. Since you have not laid out your argument in full, of course, I cannot say for sure. But if you did in fact deduce that then I would be interested in hearing your line of reasoning.
> OMG I just deduced something!!
Probably not.
I think, in all probability, that you actually derived that conclusion by way of inductive reasoning, where a series of examples or premises are viewed as supplying some evidence for the truth of the conclusion. If you had deduced that, you would have had to reach a reductive conclusion by working from general rules to show that they hold true for this particular conclusion. Since you have not laid out your argument in full, of course, I cannot say for sure. But if you did in fact deduce that then I would be interested in hearing your line of reasoning.
Father Syntax joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,059,591
It is eye. A mod I am not not NOT, but my contribution to this site makes wallet fatter.