Topic: The Trump shirt I want..
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #93,454
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later[^] [v] #1,058,184
Could you make that link a bit longer?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,185
The fora will chip in to get you this one.
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,187
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
They forgot to add in small print on the bottom 'And another new house for Bernie'
They forgot to add in small print on the bottom 'And another new house for Bernie'
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,190
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,192
@1,058,187 (A)
Yeah, like you, I strongly and sincerely believe that anyone who is wealthy enough to own multiple pieces of real estate cannot be elected president. There would be too many conflicts of interests and attempts to host government events at properties owned or operated by that person.
Yeah, like you, I strongly and sincerely believe that anyone who is wealthy enough to own multiple pieces of real estate cannot be elected president. There would be too many conflicts of interests and attempts to host government events at properties owned or operated by that person.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,196
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,197
@previous (A)
Do you think that only independently wealthy people should be allowed to run for Congress?
Do you think that only independently wealthy people should be allowed to run for Congress?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,199
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Chuckling to myself that there's a 0% chance of him putting forward a coherent poltical belief here.
Orange man good indeed.
Chuckling to myself that there's a 0% chance of him putting forward a coherent poltical belief here.
Orange man good indeed.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,200
@previous (E)
Not only is orange man good, but conversely, democrat bad. It's a very nuanced and complex worldview that you in your liberal elitist bubble would not understand. This is why Trump won.
Not only is orange man good, but conversely, democrat bad. It's a very nuanced and complex worldview that you in your liberal elitist bubble would not understand. This is why Trump won.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,202
@1,058,192 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Haven't most of the presidents been wealthy before taking office?
Haven't most of the presidents been wealthy before taking office?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,217
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Most yes. Carter was famously not that wealthy, and was one of the first members of his family to graduate high school. President Truman went bankrupt and to save him from humiliation Congress set up a Presidential pension. Obama assumed office still with student loan debt iirc. Trump is far and away the richest person to ever be elected president though.
Most yes. Carter was famously not that wealthy, and was one of the first members of his family to graduate high school. President Truman went bankrupt and to save him from humiliation Congress set up a Presidential pension. Obama assumed office still with student loan debt iirc. Trump is far and away the richest person to ever be elected president though.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,221
@OP
This shirt is a parody, right?
This shirt is a parody, right?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,227
@1,058,217 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
But him being more rich than other Presidents doesn't mean much, right? I think that many had multiple properties
But him being more rich than other Presidents doesn't mean much, right? I think that many had multiple properties
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,236
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I mean, no other president ever had the government spend taxpayer dollars at his own golf course so that he could golf all day, or host international events at struggling resorts he owns to boost their popularity and revenue, or own several hotels that foreign dignitaries will rent out to curry favor with him over issues of national interest, etc.
I mean, no other president ever had the government spend taxpayer dollars at his own golf course so that he could golf all day, or host international events at struggling resorts he owns to boost their popularity and revenue, or own several hotels that foreign dignitaries will rent out to curry favor with him over issues of national interest, etc.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,243
@1,058,197 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Well now bub...not sure...but maybe if so then all the goddamn decisions they made wouldn't be just so they could get rich...how bout that..
Well now bub...not sure...but maybe if so then all the goddamn decisions they made wouldn't be just so they could get rich...how bout that..
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,244
@1,058,217 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Obammy is pretty fucking well off now...and it's because of graft..
Obammy is pretty fucking well off now...and it's because of graft..
(Edited 19 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,246
Obammy went into office not even technically middle class...was paid a salary of a free hundred k a year and now go check the motherfuckers net worth..
Anonymous A (OP) quadruple-posted this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,248
@1,058,217 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
And America was a better place when Carter was in office...perhaps there were some economic challenges but noones had to say-
'Ohhhh it's perfectly fine for Johnny to have two daddies' or 'Trannies are good decent people who deserve respect'
or be faced with national shaming on CNN..
And America was a better place when Carter was in office...perhaps there were some economic challenges but noones had to say-
'Ohhhh it's perfectly fine for Johnny to have two daddies' or 'Trannies are good decent people who deserve respect'
or be faced with national shaming on CNN..
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,254
@1,058,243 (A)
Do you think rich people ever hit a point at which they don't actively want to earn more money? I don't. Trump and his kids also don't.
@1,058,244 (A)
Graft? He wrote books and is in demand generally because he's a very popular former president. There is no graft needed to explain why he's wealthy.
@1,058,246 (A)
It's not "free" because he was working for a living. Also there are expenses while president too lol. They have to pay for all the food prepared by the WH kitchen etc. It's not a free ride
Do you think rich people ever hit a point at which they don't actively want to earn more money? I don't. Trump and his kids also don't.
@1,058,244 (A)
Graft? He wrote books and is in demand generally because he's a very popular former president. There is no graft needed to explain why he's wealthy.
@1,058,246 (A)
It's not "free" because he was working for a living. Also there are expenses while president too lol. They have to pay for all the food prepared by the WH kitchen etc. It's not a free ride
jodi !ariasXXmaE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 23 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,255
@1,058,248 (A)
> And America was a better place when Carter was in office...perhaps there were some economic challenges but noones had to say-
>
> 'Ohhhh it's perfectly fine for Johnny to have two daddies' or 'Trannies are good decent people who deserve respect'
>
> or be faced with national shaming on CNN..
are these actually your problems
are you really more bothered by 2 dads than not having a bed, money for food, and being unemployed? idgi
> And America was a better place when Carter was in office...perhaps there were some economic challenges but noones had to say-
>
> 'Ohhhh it's perfectly fine for Johnny to have two daddies' or 'Trannies are good decent people who deserve respect'
>
> or be faced with national shaming on CNN..
are these actually your problems
are you really more bothered by 2 dads than not having a bed, money for food, and being unemployed? idgi
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,256
@1,058,248 (A)
I don't want to be reductive but I can't help like your entire political outlook just boils down to being mad that a black guy got elected president and that gays got the right to marry. Which is a bad foundation for a worldview.
I don't want to be reductive but I can't help like your entire political outlook just boils down to being mad that a black guy got elected president and that gays got the right to marry. Which is a bad foundation for a worldview.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,257
@1,058,254 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
If Obammy had in been Elton John's body(white) but otherwise said ND did everything else exactly as he did..?
He'd have been about as popular as John Kerry..
If Obammy had in been Elton John's body(white) but otherwise said ND did everything else exactly as he did..?
He'd have been about as popular as John Kerry..
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 42 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,258
@1,058,248 (A)
> And America was a better place when Carter was in office...perhaps there were some economic challenges but noones had to say-
>
> 'Ohhhh it's perfectly fine for Johnny to have two daddies' or 'Trannies are good decent people who deserve respect'
>
> or be faced with national shaming on CNN..
There's a fundamental question that you always dodge answering but which you should if you want your rants about American 'greatness' to be taken seriously: why won't you get a job?
> And America was a better place when Carter was in office...perhaps there were some economic challenges but noones had to say-
>
> 'Ohhhh it's perfectly fine for Johnny to have two daddies' or 'Trannies are good decent people who deserve respect'
>
> or be faced with national shaming on CNN..
There's a fundamental question that you always dodge answering but which you should if you want your rants about American 'greatness' to be taken seriously: why won't you get a job?
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,261
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,263
@1,058,257 (A)
I don't think he could have been president from inside Elton John's body because that body was made in England. How about Liberace? He was American.
I don't think he could have been president from inside Elton John's body because that body was made in England. How about Liberace? He was American.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 37 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,270
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,273
@1,058,236 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
That's him being smart. I'll bet that other Presidents would have done the same if they owned such properties. I don't even like Trump and I'm saying this.
Presidents spend tons of taxpayer dollars to kill brown people in other countries, and so this other type of thing means nothing to me
That's him being smart. I'll bet that other Presidents would have done the same if they owned such properties. I don't even like Trump and I'm saying this.
Presidents spend tons of taxpayer dollars to kill brown people in other countries, and so this other type of thing means nothing to me
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 26 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,284
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I'll bet that other Presidents would have done the same if they owned such properties.
Would it shock you to learn that other presidents probably considered such things to be illegal?
> That's him being smart.
Plenty of politicians have used their office to funnel taxpayer money into their businesses preferentially. "Being smart" isn't usually the phrase that appears in court documents to describe that practice.
> I'll bet that other Presidents would have done the same if they owned such properties.
Would it shock you to learn that other presidents probably considered such things to be illegal?
> That's him being smart.
Plenty of politicians have used their office to funnel taxpayer money into their businesses preferentially. "Being smart" isn't usually the phrase that appears in court documents to describe that practice.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,304
@previous (I)
Is it illegal or unethical?
If it is illegal, will they arrest him?
Why is that illegal but not killing so many people?
Still, I don't care
Is it illegal or unethical?
If it is illegal, will they arrest him?
Why is that illegal but not killing so many people?
Still, I don't care
Anonymous I replied with this 6 years ago, 5 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,375
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I get that you generally approach politics as if simply being elected to office is cause to think someone is a corrupt pedo or whatever. But the things you choose to get outraged about and the things you choose to adopt a legal and moral nihilism toward are a little baffling at times.
I get that you generally approach politics as if simply being elected to office is cause to think someone is a corrupt pedo or whatever. But the things you choose to get outraged about and the things you choose to adopt a legal and moral nihilism toward are a little baffling at times.
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,377
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 50 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,382
Surprised you didn't go for this one
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 6 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,436
@1,058,375 (I)
I believe that people dying in foreign countries is more outrageous than side hustles.
I believe that people dying in foreign countries is more outrageous than side hustles.
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,503
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,513
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 29 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,518
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,519
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,520
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,538
jodi !ariasXXmaE replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,058,542
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)“I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and wouldn’t lose any voters, ok?”