Topic: Hilarious how everyone gets so psycho and worked up over Matt

Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #93,361

lol all he had to do is say one word or post one pic and people lose their shit for weeks on end

The Witch Doctor !KBa60Oy7Wg joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,057,342

We know Matt. We know. And to brag about it, you make new threads about yourself.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 20 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,343

I will take Matt's stuff any day over that cringey prune juice drinking stalker's babbling.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 38 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,346

@previous (C)

> I will take Matt's stuff any day over that cringey prune juice drinking stalker's babbling.

lol

The Witch Doctor !KBa60Oy7Wg replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,347

How many more threads will you make about yourself today Matt?

Also, please respond to the following which you have avoided.

> Take a screenshot of the thread page so we can see that every thread is about Matt. Thanks.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,354

He is one of the greatest trolls the internet has ever known. Weak minded people can't resist his polished trolling ways.

The Witch Doctor !KBa60Oy7Wg replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,358

@previous (D)
One uid please. You know the rules Matt.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 54 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,368

@1,057,346 (A)
When I try to leave a review on your site I get a 'Forbidden' notice. Please fix it.

Indy (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 31 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,370

@previous (E)
They must be approved by me. Thanks.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,374

A bit like Trump/Twitter (e.g. covfefe)

Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 35 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,385

@1,057,370 (Indy)

> They must be approved by me. Thanks.

But it was instantly 'Forbidden'. There's no way you had time to check it. You have a bug on the site.

Also, it's not very objective to have 'reviews' that are checked by the owner before being posted. What's to stop you cherry picking only the good ones?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 35 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,386

@previous (E)
If I disapprove a review once, that reviewer is banned from reviewing again. It prevents trolls.

Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,387

@previous (A)
> If I disapprove a review once, that reviewer is banned from reviewing again. It prevents trolls.
Will you allow me to make a review containing the words "girlturd" and "pronounced as one word"?

Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,390

@1,057,386 (A)

> If I disapprove a review once, that reviewer is banned from reviewing again. It prevents trolls.

I tried to submit once only and it was automatically rejected. You didn't review it. You have a bug dude.

Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,391

@previous (E)
> I tried to submit once only and it was automatically rejected. You didn't review it. You have a bug dude.
If it was a bug it would throw a 500, not a 403. Seems legit if you're trying to write a spam/troll review.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,392

@1,057,387 (F)
No

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 18 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,393

@1,057,390 (E)
It was your first review ever?

Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 6 years ago, 34 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,394

@1,057,390 (E)
Maybe Akismet recognizes it as a spamtroll

Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 37 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,395

@1,057,393 (A)

> It was your first review ever?

Yes.

Anonymous E double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,397

@1,057,394 (A)

> Maybe Akismet recognizes it as a spamtroll

But I'm not spamming and I'm not a troll. You have a bug.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,400

@previous (E)
It works fine for me and others. I will have a look though. Thank you.

Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,405

@previous (A)

> It works fine for me and others. I will have a look though. Thank you.

Thank you! Excellent customer service. Good, fast communication. Fix the bug and I will compliment you on it in my review.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,408

@previous (E)
I love you. Thanks.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,467

@1,057,391 (F)
I mean, no, not necessarily. A bug could cause any status code to be returned.

Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,489

Syntax is finished here!

Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 21 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,497

@1,057,467 (G)
> I mean, no, not necessarily. A bug could cause any status code to be returned.
My point is it's not a generic bug (like a null pointer exception or something) which would result in a 500, but specifically 403 / Forbidden. 403 usually implies that read/write permissions to some resource or other on the server are not set correctly. It's probably the write permissions on the DB. Bug == programming fuckup -> 500. Permissions -> 403.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,583

@OP

Who’s “Matt”?

Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 5 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,057,678

@1,057,497 (F)
That likely is the case, but it doesn't necessarily have to be. Plenty of bugs can mean 4xx errors are thrown, especially if you're doing any status code handling directly. You're probably right in this situation, but "If it was a bug it would throw a 500, not a 403" just isn't true. I've written plenty of code that ends up with 403/404/418. ?

Minichan