Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 21 minutes later[^][v]#1,055,362
Definitely...but when these Liberalcrats say 90% they're fucking STUPID..
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,055,368
@previous (B)
But someone needs to finance the unemployed, no? Where else do you think welfare money comes from?
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,055,370
@1,055,362 (B)
Why? Why do you think someone who makes, let's say, a billion a year, should not be taxed at 90% after $50 million? Is $50 million not enough?
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 41 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,055,384
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,055,389
@previous (B)
Then why not answer it and enlighten me? Why is it so important to you, a poor jobless man, that the rich guy get his $51 million?
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,055,397
@previous (A)
Sit and think for awhile and you might understand why your question of whether a person who ' makes a billion dollars in a year' should give 90% of the billion
over 50,000,000 of it up...is absurd.
I feel sorry for you that you don't understand something so simple.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,055,398
@previous (B)
Then explain it to me instead of avoiding the question. Why is $50 million a year not enough for a single human being?
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,055,404
@1,055,389 (A)
I will give you a bit of help.
What is the person doing...what is involved in how that billion comes to be?
I will say yes...if a person somehow sits in a jacuzzi and drinks champagne every day and somehow has a billion dollars delivered to him...and is not integral to an enormous process which produces that billion dollar sum...then hypotheticaly yes...(maybe)tax him in the manner you proscribe..
But chances are SEVERAL times that 50 million went into the process of producing that Billion..
Are you getting it..
Anonymous B double-posted this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,405
@1,055,398 (A)
Do you feel that if someone who owns a company that employs 2000 people and the business has gross sales of
10 million a year...that the owner gets to put 10 million in his bank account?
It doesn't work that way.
(Edited 44 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,406
@1,055,404 (B) @previous (B)
So you think that people exponentially richer than you will ever e, and who have more money than they could use in 100 lifetimes, should just get richer. Again, why do you, a poor, unemployed homeless person, defend the mega rich? That is my original question.
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 23 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,413
@previous (D)
If You are making 50,000 a year a homeless person stopping by your house should not have the right to ride off on a motorcycle out of your garage should he?
For the same reason the Government shouldn't be allowed to just decide one day to tax Richie rich folks and give poor people a check with it.
You people are so naive. The math has already been done on this shit anyway...if they taxed the richest of the top wealth owners at 90% it wouldn't pay for a 10th of all these socialist schemes which are proposed by this New Green deal bullshit..
AND THATS...If all those rich folks would even begin to keep doing (as if lol) what they are doing when you take 90% of their money away..
Liberalism is a mental disorder..
(Edited 6 minutes later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,416
> For the same reason the Government shouldn't be allowed to just decide one day to tax Richie rich folks and give poor people a check with it. > > You people are so naive.
Aren't you on welfare?
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 39 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,417
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 9 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,431
@1,055,413 (B) > a homeless person stopping by your house should not have the right to ride off on a motorcycle out of your garage should he?
Literally no one is suggesting this. It's incorrect. It's a bad analogy. It's not remotely related to the issue. Even hypothetical homeless motorcycle thieves probably realize that what they are doing is wrong. I think most of problem is that the only arguments you hear about taxation are stupid strawman positions like this.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Ananthanarayanan M R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,451
how much did apple and google pay in taxes last year
Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,458
@1,055,413 (B)
You don't think the massively wealthy should give something back to the system that enabled their massive wealth to begin with?
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,463
@previous (Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6) Give something back? Like employing millions of people and giving them paychecks with which to support themselves and their families...thus also indirectly providind huge amounts of capital to the State and Federal Government via income taxes and sales taxes those millions of employees pay?
Yes, I support that..
(Edited 9 minutes later.)
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,464
Business owners are responsible 24/7 for taking care of business. Nine to fivers line up at four thirty when they should still be working...to clock out and run home to watch wheel of Fortune at the end of the shift.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,471
> Business owners are responsible 24/7 for taking care of business. Nine to fivers line up at four thirty when they should still be working...to clock out and run home to watch wheel of Fortune at the end of the shift.
Do you have a job?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,484
@1,055,469 (B)
The factory worker works much harder than the factory boss.
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 22 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,495
@1,055,469 (B)
Wow you clock out early when you work a 9-5? Way to be part of the problem and not the solution
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,541
Not everyone's main job of the year is sitting around on your ass with other potheads in your dirty clothes and flip-flops giggling while while you trim plants, skippy..
Anonymous B double-posted this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,544
@1,055,484 (A)
Really? Then why don't they just start their own business and relax while they count all the money?
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,546
@1,055,541 (B)
You've never been a business owner, so your only perspective out of the two you gave would be the 9-5 perspective, and you said y'all line up at 4:30, your words, not mine
Anonymous B replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,548
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
You've never been a real employee..
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,554
@1,055,544 (B)
Because starting a business requires capital, and the working people do not have capital. Haven’t you ever read Marx?
jodi !ariasXXmaE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,557
> Learn to read.. > > Not everyone's main job of the year is sitting around on your ass with other potheads in your dirty clothes and flip-flops giggling while while you trim plants, skippy..
what is your "main job of the year"? shitposting from your spot on the floor of your mom's trailer while swiping enough of her change change to get your next bottle of everclear? ?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,559
@previous (jodi !ariasXXmaE)
And cheering for billionaire tax cheats.
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 6 years ago, 36 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,055,576
@1,055,548 (B)
I have held down several different jobs in the 14 some years I've been adulting