Topic: Photo of Katie Hill the Democrat caught up in a sex scandal naked while smoking a bong surfaces
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #92,974
I like her more now. I don't like the picture, it's not flattering and the bong is filthy, but I like her more now.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later[^] [v] #1,053,354
Yes, also she was photographed nude combing her staffer's hair! This is just a good old fashioned sex scandal that everyone can enjoy.
Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,356
Trump can do literally anything and Republicans don't give a shit, but I'm sure since she's a Democrat she will be eaten alive for doing absolutely fucking nothing wrong.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,358
@previous (Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6)
Actually the response so far has been pretty muted. Everyone agrees it's pretty fuckin sweet.
Actually the response so far has been pretty muted. Everyone agrees it's pretty fuckin sweet.
Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,362
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
That is honestly really surprising to me. I hope it stays that way and doesn't become the next big thing for the Fox News crowd to continually bitch about.
That is honestly really surprising to me. I hope it stays that way and doesn't become the next big thing for the Fox News crowd to continually bitch about.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,366
Please post the pics
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,381
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,384
@1,053,366 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You should be able to find them by googling. They were leaked by her husband during what appears to be a pretty nasty divorce proceeding. Idk what minichan rules about revenge porn also!
You should be able to find them by googling. They were leaked by her husband during what appears to be a pretty nasty divorce proceeding. Idk what minichan rules about revenge porn also!
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 27 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,386
In the pic she is nude combing the hair of a staffer who looks at the camera seductively. Evidently the woman is ten years younger than her and they were in a throuple relationship with her and the Congress womans husband. Also she has a Nazi Iron Cross tattoo in one of the pics
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,389
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,397
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,399
Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 replied with this 6 years ago, 16 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,400
@1,053,389 (E)
She does have an iron cross tattoo but apparently its use has evolved over the years and it isn't really associated with Nazis anymore. That's what the ADL claims anyway, I don't know anything about the symbol's current use myself. https://www.adl.org/education/references/hate-symbols/iron-cross
She does have an iron cross tattoo but apparently its use has evolved over the years and it isn't really associated with Nazis anymore. That's what the ADL claims anyway, I don't know anything about the symbol's current use myself. https://www.adl.org/education/references/hate-symbols/iron-cross
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 44 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,401
@previous (Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6)
I think it looks more like a shamrock tbh
Kook I'm being rude, sorry. But it's not a nazi thing.
I think it looks more like a shamrock tbh
Kook I'm being rude, sorry. But it's not a nazi thing.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,402
Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,405
@1,053,401 (E)
To me it does look like an iron cross as depicted in the link I posted, but without the swastika in the middle.
To me it does look like an iron cross as depicted in the link I posted, but without the swastika in the middle.
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,407
@1,053,402 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Wow, don't have a period just because I disagreed with you..
Wow, don't have a period just because I disagreed with you..
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,410
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,411
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,412
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,414
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,417
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,418
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,419
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,422
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,427
@previous (E)
Okay friend. Try to do some fun and relaxing activities while you wait it out. Oh and have a snack as well
Okay friend. Try to do some fun and relaxing activities while you wait it out. Oh and have a snack as well
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,430
I just saw the pic of her with the bong and she does have a Iron Cross tattoo. I was skeptical that it really was because RW faux outrage would push something stupid like that but it’s real.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,433
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 21 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,436
In the photo, you can see her butthole.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 15 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,606
lol-
"Another set of images obtained but not published by DailyMail.com shows Hill and Desjardins inside a steamy shower, embracing and kissing each other."
"Another set of images obtained but not published by DailyMail.com shows Hill and Desjardins inside a steamy shower, embracing and kissing each other."
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,608
I lol'd
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,609
So I think what this shows is that if the Democrats became the party of blonde MFF threesomes they would win every election by a mile.
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 20 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,613
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,615
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,648
> Another set of images obtained but not published by DailyMail.com shows Hill and Desjardins inside a steamy shower, embracing and kissing each other.
Are Daily Mail readers still afraid of women kissing?
Are Daily Mail readers still afraid of women kissing?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,649
@previous (J)
No, one of the images posted is of women kissing (at least one that I've seen). Whatever their "journalistic" reasons are for not showing it, I'm glad they didn't. This is all very scummy by the soon-to-be ex husband and the bottom-feeding media that would post nonconsensually distributed nude photographs.
No, one of the images posted is of women kissing (at least one that I've seen). Whatever their "journalistic" reasons are for not showing it, I'm glad they didn't. This is all very scummy by the soon-to-be ex husband and the bottom-feeding media that would post nonconsensually distributed nude photographs.
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,651
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
What bizarre timing. Much of her district (CA-25) is dealing with a major fire right now and, if they aren't evacuating their homes, they are probably focused on doing other things. I don't know that weed-fueled make out sessions would necessarily seem scandalous to the Santa Clarita or Antelope Valley crowds that voted for her anyway.
What bizarre timing. Much of her district (CA-25) is dealing with a major fire right now and, if they aren't evacuating their homes, they are probably focused on doing other things. I don't know that weed-fueled make out sessions would necessarily seem scandalous to the Santa Clarita or Antelope Valley crowds that voted for her anyway.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,652
@previous (J)
Meh, a scandal breaks when it breaks. I'm not super concerned about the timing. Releasing it during the 2020 campaign would be way more politically damaging, this is just jilted lover's payback.
Meh, a scandal breaks when it breaks. I'm not super concerned about the timing. Releasing it during the 2020 campaign would be way more politically damaging, this is just jilted lover's payback.
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,654
@1,053,651 (J)
Much like the Liberalcrats jabbering about inconsequential bullsit 24/7 since 2016 about Trump as he's going about his Presidential duties, huh?
Much like the Liberalcrats jabbering about inconsequential bullsit 24/7 since 2016 about Trump as he's going about his Presidential duties, huh?
(Edited 41 seconds later.)
Anonymous H double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,655
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,656
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,660
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,674
I've heard that she previously chewed someone out over Twitter for using the iron cross symbol
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 46 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,676
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,680
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 52 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,682
She's probably done blackface several times.
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,686
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,696
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,699
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,719
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,720
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I think people on the right are tying to play this up as much as possible
I think people on the right are tying to play this up as much as possible
tteh !GETFUCKED joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,721
ugh we need to put an end to these drug-fuelled hairbrushing saturnaliæ
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,732
The left is playing it up. They think perversion is something to be proud of.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,737
@1,053,720 (E)
If this had happened to politicians of either party, the opposite group would play it up
If this had happened to politicians of either party, the opposite group would play it up
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,741
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Would they invent fictional tweets and post revenge porn all over the jewspapers?
Would they invent fictional tweets and post revenge porn all over the jewspapers?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,756
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,758
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,767
@previous (E)
I believe that they have tweaked the truth. Also did a Republican post that revenge porn? Was her ex husband a Republican?
I believe that they have tweaked the truth. Also did a Republican post that revenge porn? Was her ex husband a Republican?
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,769
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I think it's Republicans making it go viral, often with falsehoods and hyperbole
I think it's Republicans making it go viral, often with falsehoods and hyperbole
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,771
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,773
@1,053,769 (E)
You think that nude photos of a Congress woman who is depicted smoking weed, doing sexual things with a woman, and having an Iron Cross tattoo wouldnt go viral without Republicans pushing it? Are you crazy or retarded?
You think that nude photos of a Congress woman who is depicted smoking weed, doing sexual things with a woman, and having an Iron Cross tattoo wouldnt go viral without Republicans pushing it? Are you crazy or retarded?
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,777
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Neither? Its a Fox Media outlet which published them and all I see on twitter is people talking about libruls and trump
Neither? Its a Fox Media outlet which published them and all I see on twitter is people talking about libruls and trump
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,784
@previous (E)
You think that if a Republican was recorded nude, smoking weed, having leabian sex acts, and sporting a Nazi tattoo, Democrats wouldnt be freaking out over Twitter? Be fucking realistic. This is an incredibly entertaining situation and you are being a bitch, dude.
You think that if a Republican was recorded nude, smoking weed, having leabian sex acts, and sporting a Nazi tattoo, Democrats wouldnt be freaking out over Twitter? Be fucking realistic. This is an incredibly entertaining situation and you are being a bitch, dude.
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,794
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
No I'm not, you're just on the jammy rag about it because I'm not joining in the punching down and false accusations of hypocrisy.
No I'm not, you're just on the jammy rag about it because I'm not joining in the punching down and false accusations of hypocrisy.
Anonymous E double-posted this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,803
I don't see what's so wrong with the idea that all the people joining in on how terrible this person is for smoking a bong and being naked and having a tattoo are her political opponents
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,804
@1,053,794 (E)
Because people will use anything to hurt their political opponents and Democrats would do the same. Some of us though, are just enjoying ourselves and not being self righteous
Because people will use anything to hurt their political opponents and Democrats would do the same. Some of us though, are just enjoying ourselves and not being self righteous
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,811
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Yeah, remember what the Dems did to kavanaugh? I think that actually helped Republicans. This shit is just funny
Yeah, remember what the Dems did to kavanaugh? I think that actually helped Republicans. This shit is just funny
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,818
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,836
Personally, I think it would have been cooler if she had a NXIVM brand.@1,053,784 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> sporting a Nazi tattoo
LOL Do you think she's a secret Nazi? Maybe a secret Nazi who lectures other Nazis about things in Twitter posts people only gossip about?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 40 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,849
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 6 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,850
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 30 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,865
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I wonder what the story is behind it. It looks weird and blurry in the photos. And enough skate/truck/motorcycle/punk/clothing shit uses an iron cross, or something close, in designs that it's pretty common. Do you think it was like her drunken pick at a tattoo parlor in college or do you think she's really a secret Nazi who does secret Nazi stuff that only people who see her pelvis can know about? Her dad is a cop. Maybe she had a weird rebellious streak growing up?
I wonder what the story is behind it. It looks weird and blurry in the photos. And enough skate/truck/motorcycle/punk/clothing shit uses an iron cross, or something close, in designs that it's pretty common. Do you think it was like her drunken pick at a tattoo parlor in college or do you think she's really a secret Nazi who does secret Nazi stuff that only people who see her pelvis can know about? Her dad is a cop. Maybe she had a weird rebellious streak growing up?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,866
@previous (J)
I really really want it to be something Nazi related" but Im not that fortunate. It's probably some stupid stoner thing.
We have an old lady at my work with a Hells Angels tattoo on her vaginal mound. And when I saw it, I almost fell over
I really really want it to be something Nazi related" but Im not that fortunate. It's probably some stupid stoner thing.
We have an old lady at my work with a Hells Angels tattoo on her vaginal mound. And when I saw it, I almost fell over
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,867
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,868
@previous (J)
I didn't ask. I would feel really awkward about that. She looked like someone's grandmother!
I didn't ask. I would feel really awkward about that. She looked like someone's grandmother!
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,870
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Yeah, I can imagine that being an awkward subject to broach with someone.
Yeah, I can imagine that being an awkward subject to broach with someone.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,874
@previous (J)
It's also like how I didn't mention that other woman's wish spot, but she brought it up herself
It's also like how I didn't mention that other woman's wish spot, but she brought it up herself
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,890
I dislike how partisan this is being made, even in this very thread. Gone are the days in which we could all share a bipartisan laugh at a politician having a sex scandal.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,904
@1,053,874 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Wish spot?
@1,053,866 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I see iron crosses used more in biker contexts than neonazi contexts
Wish spot?
@1,053,866 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I see iron crosses used more in biker contexts than neonazi contexts
Nope joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,908
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,910
She’s right though I do see bikers with Iron Crosses on their jackets and helmets tbf fat old white guys that wear that stuff have a high likelihood of being racist
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,912
Consider this replied with this 6 years ago, 18 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,914
Why isn't there a place in 'Diversity' for people you see as racist?
That's because your definition of diversity is not what it says in the dictionary.
That's because your definition of diversity is not what it says in the dictionary.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 54 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,940
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 6 years ago, 25 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,053,941
@1,053,904 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Are you around a lot of neo Nazis?
It's a patch of hair on your lower back that is so long and thick, it looks like another scalp
Are you around a lot of neo Nazis?
It's a patch of hair on your lower back that is so long and thick, it looks like another scalp
(Edited 1 minute later.)
