Minichan

Topic: Why are conservatives so frightened of the world?

Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #92,865

It is a noticeable trend.

Erik !jzYkdX7lIw joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later[^] [v] #1,052,489

Because of climate change

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,492

Why do liberals want to destroy America?

It is a noticable trend.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,494

@previous (C)
Liberals only want to destroy the parts of America that conservatives love: slavery, poverty, hatred, racism, not helping others, love of war, etc.

tteh !GETFUCKED joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,499

@previous (D)
That's all the good bits.

Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,500

@1,052,494 (D)

> slavery

It was Republicans who freed the slaves. Thanks.

> poverty

Blame the Democratic party for this. They love giving themselves raises, but not for the normal working man/woman.

> hatred

Democrats are the most hateful species in this country. They didn't want the slaves freed.

> racism

Let's compare violence between blacks against whites, and whites against blacks. More blacks have committed crimes of racism against whites for being white.

> not helping others

Name one thing the Democratic party has done. I'll wait.

> love of war

Last I seen, Trump was pulling troops out of other countries. Why should we fight another country's war? Democrats are upset because of the troop withdrawal. Why is that?

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 41 seconds later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,501

Externally hosted image@1,052,494 (D)

Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 44 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,530

@1,052,500 (C)
This is what Fox News viewers actually believe

Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 22 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,534

Externally hosted image@previous (Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6)

Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,536

@previous (F)
In case you're actually retarded and not merely pretending, I invite you to do some research into the ideologies of Republicans and Democrats during this time period. Republicans then held views very similar to those of modern Democrats, and Democrats then held views very similar to those of modern Republicans. I don't expect you to care though, because you're only interested in seeing "your team" win rather than holding any actual opinions of your own.

Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,537

@previous (Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6)
The Democratic Party started in the 1820s

Right away, it switched sides, as we can see from the fact that they pushed for the removal and extermination of Indians. Also, their opposition was the Whig party, which was against the Indian Removal Act and vowed to protect minorities against mob rule. Because the sides were switched, the vast majority of Whig party were anti-slavery.

(Eventually, there was rift in the party over the issue of slavery, and anti-slavery members of the Whig party, including Abraham Lincoln, exited the party and formed the Republican Party. As we can see, the parties must have switched again because it's common knowledge that republicans are actually the racist ones.)

Then the parties switched when the democrats are on record as having mainly been the ones who owned slaves. Not all democrats owned slaves, but 100% of slaves were owned by democrats. Not a single republican in history owned a slave.

As we know, the parties switched again when republicans repudiated slavery and democrats defended it, leading to the civil war.

Then the parties switched again when a democrat assassinated republican Lincoln.

After the civil war, the parties switched again during the reconstruction era, when republicans attempted to pass a series of civil rights amendments in the late 1800s that would grant citizenship for freedmen. As evidence of the switch, the democrats voted against giving former slaves citizenship, but the civil rights amendments passed anyway.

The parties switched again when the Democratic Party members founded the KKK as their military arm. Democrats then attempted to pass the first gun control law in order to keep blacks from having guns and retaliating against their former owners. A county wanted to make it illegal to possess firearms, unless you were on a horse. (Hmmm wonder who rode around on horses terrorizing people ?). Gun control has always been a noble cause touted by democrats, but the racist reasons why the concept of gun control was dreamed up was a part of a party mentality switch, but not the actual party.

Somewhere around this time former slaves fought for gun rights for all, and the NRA was formed. The NRA switched parties too when they defended the right for blacks to arm themselves and white NRA members protected blacks from racist attackers.

The parties switched again when republicans fought to desegregate schools and allow black children to attend school with white children, which democrats fought fiercely against.

The nation saw a rash of black lynchings and bombings of black churches by the democrats in the KKK and the parties switched again when Democrat Bull Conner tried to avoid prosecuting the racist bombers to get them off the hook. When blacks protested this injustice, the party-switched democrat Bull Conner sicced dogs and turned the hose on them. He also gave police stand down orders when the KKK forewarned attacks on the freedom riders, who had switched parties.

The parties switched again when a Democratic Party president appointmented the first and only KKK member to the Supreme Court.

The parties switched yet again when Democratic president FDR put Asians in racist internment camps.

Then parties switched again when the democrats filibustered the passing of the second set of civil rights laws giving equal protection to minorities.

The parties switched when a democrat assassinated MLK.

This brings us to modern times. The parties continue to switch all the time.

The parties switched when democrats proposed racist policies like affirmative action to limit opportunities for certain racial groups in order to grant privilege to other racial groups.

The parties switched when the Islamic fundamentalist Omar Mateen and several other ISIS mass shooters aligned themselves with democratic candidates like Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton.

The parties switched again when liberal student groups in schools like UCLA and Berkeley call for segregated housing to make "separate but equal" housing quarters for black students. Actually this is a current ongoing thing, so the parties are right now in the middle of switching on this topic.

Parties always switched currently now that democrats are rioting and violently protesting democracy.

So as you can see, because of Party switching, democrats were always the ones who stood up against racism and wanted peace and unity while republicans were always the racist and violent ones calling for division and discord

Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,538

@previous (F)
This is copypasta, right?

Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,547

@1,052,500 (C)
You sure are stupid.

Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 19 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,557

@previous (D)

> You sure are stupid.

Hateful Democrat detected. Please drink your domestoes.

Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,598

@1,052,538 (Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6)
> So as you can see, because of Party switching, democrats were always the ones who stood up against racism and wanted peace and unity while republicans were always the racist and violent ones calling for division and discord

Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,611

@previous (F)
First of all, the entire basis of this pasta is bullshit, aside from the obvious misinformation and half-truths, because none of it describes the parties switching ideologies. It's almost as if the author doesn't know what the word "switch" means. Secondly, the part you highlighted really only backs up my point, does it not? You shouldn't be saying "oh they called themselves Republican, that means they're on my team!" You should be instead concerned with the individuals' actual views and ideas. Actually hold an opinion of your own, instead of blindly submitting to the guys wearing your color.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 44 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,623

Fuckin' Obammer: "You didn't build that"

Listen up close colored boy...you're full of shit...the goddamn Owner of that business DID built that...you rabble rousing piece of shit..
Go back to fucking your negro tranny 'wife' in his asshole and fade into obscurity you retarded Fuck.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,625

@previous (H)
Yet another example of an economically anxious normal person who voted Trump because liberals were too rude. What a shame.

(Edited 12 seconds later.)

Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,627

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You should have been a colored boy..


You're no more intelligent than them...lol..

Ananthanarayanan M R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 53 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,629

@previous (H)
do you really think you're smarter than obama

Ananthanarayanan M R double-posted this 6 years ago, 29 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,630

you know he went to school right

jodi !ariasXXmaE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,631

@1,052,629 (Ananthanarayanan M R)
why set the bar so high

Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,633

@1,052,629 (Ananthanarayanan M R)
He is a colored boy

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,636

@1,052,630 (Ananthanarayanan M R)
He went to Harvard law school and was a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago law school, before being elected as the Junior Senator from the state of Illinois.

Bert was on a boat briefly 30 years ago. But because he is the result of a white penis going into a white vagina he thinks he is superior, despite accomplishing an insignificant fraction of what Obama did. This is the absurdity and small-mindedness, but also the appeal and power of, racism.

(Edited 11 minutes later.)

Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,641

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I GOT A BC SAYS I WAS BORN IN AMERICA...he don't..

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,649

@previous (H)

Hawaii is a state. Thanks.

Ananthanarayanan M R replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,052,694

@1,052,633 (H)
and you are a very stupid man
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.