Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later[^][v]#1,045,241
1. A hyphen is not an apostrophe.
2. The presence or absence of the apostrophe doesn't change that he spelled the word "little" incorrectly.
3. I can't wait until Q people tell me why this retarded shit is actually fighting satanic globalist child sacrificers.
4. His enablers in the media and government will pretend this tweet doesn't exist and act like they've never read a single tweet of his.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) triple-posted this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,045,244
I had to reread it but "discribing" is not a word either.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 56 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,045,250
He is barely literate.
jodi !ariasXXmaE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,045,252
holy cow
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,045,266
It's times like this that I feel sorry for the NZ troll and people like him. Right now, it's his job to come in here and pretend that this is an intelligent tweet that owns the libs. Can you imagine having to do that? It's an impossible task.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,045,269
Trump a so called Business man - He looks at Ratings and Fox News is totally the winner with ratings. CNN is far behind OR R They?
With lower ratings CNN is far more profitable than Fox News - Proof? Of course given CNN is now owned by a Client AT&T and I pay close attention to Stock matters
Although Zucker has become a polarizing public figure in a hyper-partisan nation, he has pleased one important constituency — CNN’s new parent, AT&T. After six years of leading CNN to record profits, Zucker was rewarded with a new title of chairman of WarnerMedia News and Sports in March, making him the company’s maven of live TV. He will now guide CNN through a potentially epic 2020 presidential campaign while exploring ways to expand WarnerMedia’s portfolio of sports properties, which include the NBA and the NCAA Men’s Championship Basketball Tournament.
The job taps into Zucker’s passion for sports — he is a die-hard Miami Dolphins fan with vivid recall of the NFL team’s undefeated season in 1972. He dealt with sports rights negotiations during his run as president of NBCUniversal.
The elevated role is a relief to some CNN staffers who feared Zucker would leave the network after the AT&T deal. Trump has called for his firing, and some feared AT&T Chief Executive Randall Stephenson, who has a good relationship with the White House, would listen, or even spin off CNN. Right-wing commentators said definitively that Zucker would be out. There were reports Trump’s ire with CNN led to the Justice Department’s unsuccessful attempt to stop the $85-billion merger with Time Warner in the courts, a claim Justice Department officials have denied.
But Zucker told The Times in a recent interview in his empty office at Time Warner Center (the company has since moved to its new headquarters in Hudson Yards on Manhattan’s West Side) that AT&T has respected CNN’s journalistic independence. Last fall, AT&T donated $250,000 to the Committee to Protect Journalists, an organization that defends press freedom around the world.
The company was also completely on board when CNN went to court to reinstate the White House press credentials of correspondent Jim Acosta after Trump’s press office lifted them because it was unhappy with his aggressive questioning during briefings.
“I think that was an enormous test of how AT&T felt about the division,” Zucker said. “And I can tell you unequivocally from the start they were very supportive. It is not an easy thing to sue the president of the United States.”
It helps that under Zucker’s watch the network’s annual profits have doubled to $1.2 billion even as it lags behind rivals in the Nielsen ratings. Through the first five months of 2019, CNN had a daily average of 654,000 viewers — down 8% from a year ago, compared with 1.39 million for Fox News (down 3%) and 1.02 million for MSNBC (up 3%).
But about 70% of the network’s revenues come from carriage fees from cable and satellite operators, which continue to grow even as more consumers cut the cord. S&P Global Intelligence said CNN took in $974 million for its flagship channel in 2018, up nearly 7% from the previous year.
A pay TV subscription is still the only way to watch CNN live. That will not change, but Zucker said CNN could put its name on a separate direct-to-consumer streaming news service aimed at cord-cutters, as other TV news organizations have done, “within the next two years.”
CNN’s additional revenue from digital news content and its international channels have helped push annual profits to more than $1 billion in each of the last three years, and Zucker is expecting similar results in 2019.
CNN’s original series programs and films, which can draw ratings in slow breaking news periods and be sold to streaming services, have also become a lucrative business. Zucker believes ratings will rebound as the 2020 race for the White House heats up, although not the level they reached in 2017, when Trump turned cable networks into must-see TV.
Zucker has tried hard to keep CNN’s coverage in the middle lane as Fox News gets a lift from hosts and commentators who defend Trump and his policies (and regularly hammer Zucker, who has called their channel “state-run TV”), while MSNBC wins viewers with its deep dives into the administration’s troubles.
“We’re not pro-Trump and we’re not anti-Trump — we’re pro-truth,” he said. “And I understand that pro-truth in this day and age can come off as anti-Trump. But for us the chips will have to fall where they will.”
Zucker cites consumer research that CNN regularly commissions. In April, when respondents were asked to name a news organization they trust most for national and international coverage, 23% named CNN, putting it ahead of Fox News, which had 21%. Those numbers have been fairly consistent in recent years, even with Trump bashing the channel, he said.
More to read on the link but bottom line is what it's all about and High Ratings do not get Fox New quality advertisers so Fox News ends up selling time to sloppy 2nds lowcow advertisers. Quality companies do not want to be associated with Sleezy Fox
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,045,272
@previous (Syntax)
There was a very interesting article in Vanity Fair about the meltdown at Fox over impeachment. It might make you laugh. My favorite part is where former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan thinks he finally is in a position to do something about the President. Could he be any more cowardly?
(Edited 24 seconds later.)
Syntax replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,045,275
"In recent weeks, Trump has bashed Fox News on Twitter, taking particular issue lately with its polling, which, like other reputable polls, has shown the president under significant water. Meanwhile, Trump’s biggest booster seems to be having doubts of his own. This morning, Sean Hannity told friends the whistle-blower’s allegations are “really bad,” a person briefed on Hannity’s conversations told me. (Hannity did not respond to a request for comment). And according to four sources, Fox Corp CEO Lachlan Murdoch is already thinking about how to position the network for a post-Trump future."
I keep posting the Fox News Poll that over the many months keeps showing Biden gaining even more on Trump - If it were a horse race Biden wood be over the finish line and Trump wood still be in the Padlocks trying to find a way out.
There is hope for Trump
General Election: Trump vs. Biden Rasmussen Reports Biden 43, Trump 47 Trump +4
Of course the track record for Rasmussen makes them the worst polling company of all with one minor exception - They of course got it wrong in 2016 over the popular vote but by default ended up a winner because Trump pulled off the Electoral College vote - So Rasmussen got it rite but only by accident
Rasmussen also does a clever thing - They always show the losing Republican as the winner but they cut the winning point margin towards the last few months of the polls. It's so corrupt even the founder Rasmussen himself bailed out to try and keep his reputation intact
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 29 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,045,279
@1,045,250 (B)
If it weren't for autocorrect, I imagine his tweets would be much more difficult to decipher.
Green !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,045,281
That's a comma(
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,045,297
It looks like Trump wins again!
Syntax joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,045,301
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,045,307
@1,045,297 (H)
If this is winning I'd hate to see what losing looks like!