A global network of 500 scientists and professionals has prepared this urgent message. Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to global warming, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 hours later[^][v]#1,044,815
> He has worked for Shell in the oil- and gas industry and served as professor of acoustics, geophysics and innovation management at Delft University of Technology between 1976 and 2007
So a guy who worked for the oil companies and hasn't been a professor in 12 years, and never was a climate scientist is a... climate scientist?
tteh !GETFUCKED joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,044,816
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
lol, I googled a bunch of the names and saw that. This is like the list of engineers AE911Truth publish.
(Edited 19 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,044,817
@previous (tteh !GETFUCKED)
Yes they're mostly like citizen climate scientists (a.k.a. no formal climate science training of any kind) or scientists/professors of other fields. It would be like asking a group of paleontologists about plate tectonics.
Ananthanarayanan M R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 second later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,044,818
this guy seems to be a shill for shell!
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 16 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,044,819
@previous (Ananthanarayanan M R)
But he is like dutch or something isn't that good?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,044,820
politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to global warming, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation.