Topic: Why not just use a planetary cooling pad, fora?
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #91,890
It uses extra USB powered fans to suck the cold of space and blows it across the filthy polluted dusty CO2 fan of Earth, cooling down the planet while it's in a state of high use.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 42 minutes later[^] [v] #1,044,418
If space is cold, why is earth hot? ?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 55 seconds later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,420
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 32 seconds later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,421
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,430
@OP
10/10
10/10
Anonymous E double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,431
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,433
@previous (E)
But how does heat from the sun reach earth if space is cold? Something doesn't quite add up here.
But how does heat from the sun reach earth if space is cold? Something doesn't quite add up here.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,435
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,437
@1,044,433 (D)
A lot of things them sineatists say dont add up right.
They talk all kinds of gibberish but folks believe most of it.
They say this happened and that happened millions of years ago lol. They're full of shit.
A lot of things them sineatists say dont add up right.
They talk all kinds of gibberish but folks believe most of it.
They say this happened and that happened millions of years ago lol. They're full of shit.
Anonymous E double-posted this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,438
@1,044,433 (D)
They say the sun is 92 million miles from Earth. They dont know that shit!
They say the sun is 92 million miles from Earth. They dont know that shit!
(Edited 38 seconds later.)
Anonymous E triple-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,439
Think about that 92 million miles away. They dont know what is 5 million miles away lol.
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,440
@1,044,438 (E)
If the heat from the sun has to travel through 92 million miles of cold space it should have gotten cold by the time it gets to earth. Think about it, people!
If the heat from the sun has to travel through 92 million miles of cold space it should have gotten cold by the time it gets to earth. Think about it, people!
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,442
'They' will tell you the the Hubble telescope can see many times farther...but look at how they explain that shit..
You see, when it comes to the youngest, hottest, brightest stars, most of their light isn’t what humans perceive as visible: it’s actually ultraviolet. And as the Universe expands, with galaxies getting farther apart, the fabric of space expands along with it.
This means that photons, the individual quanta of light that exist in this spacetime — emitted from distant stars and galaxies en route to our eyes — get redshifted as well, their wavelengths stretched by the expansion of the Universe itself.
When we see a bright, distant, red galaxy, we can estimate what its redshift is by looking at the relative brightnesses of colors in blue, green, red and (near) infrared light, but that’s only good for an estimate. If you want to know its true redshift — and hence, its distance, using Hubble’s law — you need to measure something more definitive.
Thankfully, the physics of atoms, and of atomic transitions in particular, are the same everywhere in the Universe. If you can measure the spectrum of the emission (or absorption, depending on the type of galaxy) lines coming from an object, and identify the elements present, you can calculate in a very straightforward manner:
its redshift,
its distance,
and how old the Universe was when that light was emitted.
They're not seeing anything but lights and they guess about how the lights change and something about the 'Fabric of space' and other gobbledygook lol.
You see, when it comes to the youngest, hottest, brightest stars, most of their light isn’t what humans perceive as visible: it’s actually ultraviolet. And as the Universe expands, with galaxies getting farther apart, the fabric of space expands along with it.
This means that photons, the individual quanta of light that exist in this spacetime — emitted from distant stars and galaxies en route to our eyes — get redshifted as well, their wavelengths stretched by the expansion of the Universe itself.
When we see a bright, distant, red galaxy, we can estimate what its redshift is by looking at the relative brightnesses of colors in blue, green, red and (near) infrared light, but that’s only good for an estimate. If you want to know its true redshift — and hence, its distance, using Hubble’s law — you need to measure something more definitive.
Thankfully, the physics of atoms, and of atomic transitions in particular, are the same everywhere in the Universe. If you can measure the spectrum of the emission (or absorption, depending on the type of galaxy) lines coming from an object, and identify the elements present, you can calculate in a very straightforward manner:
its redshift,
its distance,
and how old the Universe was when that light was emitted.
They're not seeing anything but lights and they guess about how the lights change and something about the 'Fabric of space' and other gobbledygook lol.
(Edited 58 seconds later.)
Anonymous E double-posted this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,443
@1,044,440 (D)
Right...a lamp in a large room will feel warm inches from the bulb but at the other side of the room there can be ice on the wall.
92 million miles my ASS lol
Right...a lamp in a large room will feel warm inches from the bulb but at the other side of the room there can be ice on the wall.
92 million miles my ASS lol
jodi !ariasXXmaE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,444
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,445
@previous (jodi !ariasXXmaE)
lmao like a greenhouse but without any glass? Or are you saying there's a giant glass wall around the earth?
lmao like a greenhouse but without any glass? Or are you saying there's a giant glass wall around the earth?
jodi !ariasXXmaE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,447
@previous (D)
idk, maybe it's not a glass wall but a gas wall you know like because the earth has like... air on it and space doesn't so what keeps all the dang air in right??? glass. or gas
idk, maybe it's not a glass wall but a gas wall you know like because the earth has like... air on it and space doesn't so what keeps all the dang air in right??? glass. or gas
Ananthanarayanan M R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,469
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 59 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,476
People like Einstein & Planck answered these questions 100 years ago. Space is a vacuum, i.e. there are no particles in it to facilitate transfer of heat via thermal motion / kinetic energy. Energy from the sun (light and heat) is transferred via electromagnetic radiation, which is a quantum effect, not a mechanical one. This is why you can see stars and feel heat from the sun through the vacuum of space.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_law
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_law
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,477
@1,044,447 (jodi !ariasXXmaE)
@previous (J)
If space were really a vacuum then there wouldn't be any sound there, but if you watch NASA videos you can clearly hear the astronauts talking to eachother. (((Scientists))) won't tell you why!
@previous (J)
If space were really a vacuum then there wouldn't be any sound there, but if you watch NASA videos you can clearly hear the astronauts talking to eachother. (((Scientists))) won't tell you why!
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,478
@previous (D)
Oh you troll you.
Ever heard of a cool little device called a microphone? Electricity also travels via electromagnetic waves.
Oh you troll you.
Ever heard of a cool little device called a microphone? Electricity also travels via electromagnetic waves.
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,480
@previous (J)
Waves require a medium through which to propagate. It looks like you're trying to say that the universe is filled with some kind of "ether" that acts as the electromagnetic equivalent of air, but you couldn't possibly be saying that because your beloved (((scientists))) no longer believe in the ether! Something definitely isn't adding up here.
Waves require a medium through which to propagate. It looks like you're trying to say that the universe is filled with some kind of "ether" that acts as the electromagnetic equivalent of air, but you couldn't possibly be saying that because your beloved (((scientists))) no longer believe in the ether! Something definitely isn't adding up here.
Anonymous J replied with this 6 years ago, 21 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,487
@previous (D)
> no longer believe in the ether
Correct. Quantum Theory replaced all that bunk long ago. If you find these ideas outrageous and extremely difficult to grasp, then you're not alone.
> no longer believe in the ether
Correct. Quantum Theory replaced all that bunk long ago. If you find these ideas outrageous and extremely difficult to grasp, then you're not alone.
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,489
@previous (J)
(((Scientists))) claim that waves can propagate in a vacuum, but they won't explain why! Ask your Congressman why NASA is lying to you!
(((Scientists))) claim that waves can propagate in a vacuum, but they won't explain why! Ask your Congressman why NASA is lying to you!