Topic: Why can't conservatives distinguish between leftists and liberals?
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #91,882
The body cannot be blank.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,044,354
@OP
None of the differences between them are important.
None of the differences between them are important.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,360
Probably the same reason liberals can't distinguish between conservatives and nazis ?
Green !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,364
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,366
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,368
Ananthanarayanan M R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,463
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 8 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,579
@1,044,360 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
That's cause people are stupid
@1,044,364 (Green !StaYqkzUPc)
Liberals have more in common with Nazis than conservatives, thanks
That's cause people are stupid
@1,044,364 (Green !StaYqkzUPc)
Liberals have more in common with Nazis than conservatives, thanks
Green !StaYqkzUPc replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,629
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,631
@1,044,579 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
How does a weed-smoking jobless hippie become a sneering conservative? ?
How does a weed-smoking jobless hippie become a sneering conservative? ?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,044,632
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 6 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,045,113
@1,044,631 (H)
I don't think you're lumping me into the right political sphere.
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
The nazi regime used laws to break down the freedoms of their citizens for their own protection. The difference is that our left wing doesn't seem to be too anti-Semitic, more so anti Zionist, thanks.
I don't think you're lumping me into the right political sphere.
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
The nazi regime used laws to break down the freedoms of their citizens for their own protection. The difference is that our left wing doesn't seem to be too anti-Semitic, more so anti Zionist, thanks.
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 50 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,045,129
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Sure I am. You're in the sphere where you say you're a libertarian, but you just so happen to agree with and vote for the Republians.
Sure I am. You're in the sphere where you say you're a libertarian, but you just so happen to agree with and vote for the Republians.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 25 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,045,148
@1,045,113 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
> The nazi regime used laws to break down the freedoms of their citizens for their own protection.
And here I was imagining it was paramilitary squads of brown shirts and Hitler Youth doing the real legwork there, at least until they enough authority to get the military to do it for them like a real totalitarian state. I'm not sure you could call their rise to power lawful, but if you ignore the period from Hitler jumping around with a gun during a failed beer hall coup d'état until... oh the suspension of civil liberties in the wake the Reichstag fire then, sure, it's law and order all the way after that.
I don't see the comparison to US politics though. Both the left and the right pay lip service to the rule of law when it suits them and want to make more laws to "protect" the nation. Whether you think they're going to go overboard protecting us from terrorists in the airports or immigrants at the border or carbon emissions in the atmosphere you can write either side into a doomsday scenario about runaway state authority.
> The nazi regime used laws to break down the freedoms of their citizens for their own protection.
And here I was imagining it was paramilitary squads of brown shirts and Hitler Youth doing the real legwork there, at least until they enough authority to get the military to do it for them like a real totalitarian state. I'm not sure you could call their rise to power lawful, but if you ignore the period from Hitler jumping around with a gun during a failed beer hall coup d'état until... oh the suspension of civil liberties in the wake the Reichstag fire then, sure, it's law and order all the way after that.
I don't see the comparison to US politics though. Both the left and the right pay lip service to the rule of law when it suits them and want to make more laws to "protect" the nation. Whether you think they're going to go overboard protecting us from terrorists in the airports or immigrants at the border or carbon emissions in the atmosphere you can write either side into a doomsday scenario about runaway state authority.