Topic: There is no God.
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #91,659
Try to disagree with me, fora. You can't!
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agree. | 8 | 73% | |
| Can't disagree. | 3 | 27% |
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,041,921
I disagree.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 29 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,938
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,940
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,941
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 40 seconds later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,942
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,943
If there were a god why would he allow such a sad cunt place like minichan to exist? Checkmate theists.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,944
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> If there were a god why would he allow such a sad c*nt place like minichan to exist?
Because He granted us freedom of will.
> If there were a god why would he allow such a sad c*nt place like minichan to exist?
Because He granted us freedom of will.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,945
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,950
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I disagree. The alternative would have been to rob of us freedom and dictate our every move; God may as well have created a world of robots. Remember: for every Minichan, there are groups of gainfully employed people living productive and creative lives.
It's actually a great pity that the OP of this thread is so intellectually lazy and afraid of having his ideas scrutinized that he rigged the poll to force everyone who votes to agree with him (and anyone who doesn't agree with him gets met with abuse and insults). Because this issue of choice is central to God's nature.
I disagree. The alternative would have been to rob of us freedom and dictate our every move; God may as well have created a world of robots. Remember: for every Minichan, there are groups of gainfully employed people living productive and creative lives.
It's actually a great pity that the OP of this thread is so intellectually lazy and afraid of having his ideas scrutinized that he rigged the poll to force everyone who votes to agree with him (and anyone who doesn't agree with him gets met with abuse and insults). Because this issue of choice is central to God's nature.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,954
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
What if human beings create robots that wipe out all of humanity? God will have created a world full of robots, just with a lot of extra steps in between.
What if human beings create robots that wipe out all of humanity? God will have created a world full of robots, just with a lot of extra steps in between.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,956
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> What if human beings create robots that wipe out all of humanity? God will have created a world full of robots, just with a lot of extra steps in between.
False logic. If you have a child and that child grows up to create a painting, can we in any reasonable sense say that you created that painting?
Personal responsibility matters. There's a reason Jeffrey Dahmer's parents weren't convicted of murder.
> What if human beings create robots that wipe out all of humanity? God will have created a world full of robots, just with a lot of extra steps in between.
False logic. If you have a child and that child grows up to create a painting, can we in any reasonable sense say that you created that painting?
Personal responsibility matters. There's a reason Jeffrey Dahmer's parents weren't convicted of murder.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,962
@1,041,942 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Incorrect. You are a pedocunt, and therefore unworthy of both life and a voice.
Incorrect. You are a pedocunt, and therefore unworthy of both life and a voice.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,971
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,972
@1,041,956 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> If you have a child and that child grows up to create a painting, can we in any reasonable sense say that you created that painting?
If I were omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent and all along had the plan to create the child to create the painting, perhaps.
> If you have a child and that child grows up to create a painting, can we in any reasonable sense say that you created that painting?
If I were omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent and all along had the plan to create the child to create the painting, perhaps.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,974
@previous (D)
> >If you have a child and that child grows up to create a painting, can we in any reasonable sense say that you created that painting?
>
> If I were omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent and all along had the plan to create the child to create the painting, perhaps.
Now incorporate the idea that this "omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent" God granted both parent and child freedom of will.
> >If you have a child and that child grows up to create a painting, can we in any reasonable sense say that you created that painting?
>
> If I were omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent and all along had the plan to create the child to create the painting, perhaps.
Now incorporate the idea that this "omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent" God granted both parent and child freedom of will.
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 54 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,975
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Following this train of logic, we shouldn't thank God for the actions of those firefighters from your earlier thread.
Following this train of logic, we shouldn't thank God for the actions of those firefighters from your earlier thread.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,977
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,981
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
No, you thanked God for "His Holinesses safe rescue", not the firefighters.
Also, the firefighters weren't born firefighters, they chose that job. So why would you thank God for one choice a person makes, but not for another one they make?
No, you thanked God for "His Holinesses safe rescue", not the firefighters.
Also, the firefighters weren't born firefighters, they chose that job. So why would you thank God for one choice a person makes, but not for another one they make?
(Edited 55 seconds later.)
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,986
@previous (D)
> No, you thanked God for "His Holinesses safe rescue", not the firefighters.
Firstly, I would never use such awful grammar, so please be more careful when claiming to quote things I've said. And secondly, since it was the firefighters that rescued the Pope, it follows that I am thanking God for the firefighters and their rescue of the Pope. Logic, my boy. Learn it :)
> Also, the firefighters weren't born firefighters, they chose that job. So why would you thank God for one choice a person makes, but not for another one they make?
Have you never jovially thanked your mother-in-law for giving birth to your wife? I know I have.
> No, you thanked God for "His Holinesses safe rescue", not the firefighters.
Firstly, I would never use such awful grammar, so please be more careful when claiming to quote things I've said. And secondly, since it was the firefighters that rescued the Pope, it follows that I am thanking God for the firefighters and their rescue of the Pope. Logic, my boy. Learn it :)
> Also, the firefighters weren't born firefighters, they chose that job. So why would you thank God for one choice a person makes, but not for another one they make?
Have you never jovially thanked your mother-in-law for giving birth to your wife? I know I have.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,987
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> And secondly, since it was the firefighters that rescued the Pope, it follows that I am thanking God for the firefighters and their rescue of the Pope. Logic, my boy. Learn it :)
Why are you thanking God for the firefighter?
> And secondly, since it was the firefighters that rescued the Pope, it follows that I am thanking God for the firefighters and their rescue of the Pope. Logic, my boy. Learn it :)
Why are you thanking God for the firefighter?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,041,988
@1,041,971 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
The fact that you claim to have something does not mean that you are worthy of it, pedocunt.
The fact that you claim to have something does not mean that you are worthy of it, pedocunt.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 8 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,139
@1,041,944 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > If there were a god why would he allow such a sad c*nt place like minichan to exist?
>
> Because He granted us freedom of will.
Who the fuck are you to genderfi God. After reading the story about Noah's Ark, I define God as a She. (Shure there is no such thing as a God) But to assign a gender to God makes no sense, story wise.
> > If there were a god why would he allow such a sad c*nt place like minichan to exist?
>
> Because He granted us freedom of will.
Who the fuck are you to genderfi God. After reading the story about Noah's Ark, I define God as a She. (Shure there is no such thing as a God) But to assign a gender to God makes no sense, story wise.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,144
@1,041,975 (D)
LOL He did. Logical consistency isn't really his strong suit.
@1,041,956 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> False logic. If you have a child and that child grows up to create a painting, can we in any reasonable sense say that you created that painting?
Here
> Have you ever congratulated a parent for their child's success? Do you see where I'm going with this or do I really need to continue?
Huh, I guess we can't link across threads with citations anymore. :(
LOL He did. Logical consistency isn't really his strong suit.
@1,041,956 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> False logic. If you have a child and that child grows up to create a painting, can we in any reasonable sense say that you created that painting?
Here
> Have you ever congratulated a parent for their child's success? Do you see where I'm going with this or do I really need to continue?
Huh, I guess we can't link across threads with citations anymore. :(
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 6 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,231
@1,041,987 (D)
> >And secondly, since it was the firefighters that rescued the Pope, it follows that I am thanking God for the firefighters and their rescue of the Pope. Logic, my boy. Learn it :)
>
> Why are you thanking God for the firefighter?
The same reason a man may thank his mother-in-law for giving birth to his wife.
> >And secondly, since it was the firefighters that rescued the Pope, it follows that I am thanking God for the firefighters and their rescue of the Pope. Logic, my boy. Learn it :)
>
> Why are you thanking God for the firefighter?
The same reason a man may thank his mother-in-law for giving birth to his wife.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 6 years ago, 31 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,232
@1,041,988 (A)
> The fact that you claim to have something does not mean that you are worthy of it
Yes it does :)
> The fact that you claim to have something does not mean that you are worthy of it
Yes it does :)
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,234
@1,041,986 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > No, you thanked God for "His Holinesses safe rescue", not the firefighters.
>
> Firstly, I would never use such awful grammar, so please be more careful when claiming to quote things I've said. And secondly, since it was the firefighters that rescued the Pope, it follows that I am thanking God for the firefighters and their rescue of the Pope. Logic, my boy. Learn it :)
>
> > Also, the firefighters weren't born firefighters, they chose that job. So why would you thank God for one choice a person makes, but not for another one they make?
>
> Have you never jovially thanked your mother-in-law for giving birth to your wife? I know I have.
I suspected Father Merrin was an Anglican convert and my suspicions have been confirmed!
> > No, you thanked God for "His Holinesses safe rescue", not the firefighters.
>
> Firstly, I would never use such awful grammar, so please be more careful when claiming to quote things I've said. And secondly, since it was the firefighters that rescued the Pope, it follows that I am thanking God for the firefighters and their rescue of the Pope. Logic, my boy. Learn it :)
>
> > Also, the firefighters weren't born firefighters, they chose that job. So why would you thank God for one choice a person makes, but not for another one they make?
>
> Have you never jovially thanked your mother-in-law for giving birth to your wife? I know I have.
I suspected Father Merrin was an Anglican convert and my suspicions have been confirmed!
!!1YAr2FFMK replied with this 6 years ago, 51 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,252
@1,041,986 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > Have you never jovially thanked your mother-in-law for giving birth to your wife? I know I have.
> I know I have.
When did you drop your shtick?
> > Have you never jovially thanked your mother-in-law for giving birth to your wife? I know I have.
> I know I have.
When did you drop your shtick?
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,279
@1,041,986 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Have you never jovially thanked your mother-in-law for giving birth to your wife? I know I have.
So you AREN'T a priest after all? Thanks for playing.
> Have you never jovially thanked your mother-in-law for giving birth to your wife? I know I have.
So you AREN'T a priest after all? Thanks for playing.
tteh !IAMGAYLOL joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,281
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,327
@previous (tteh !IAMGAYLOL)
And you expected me to just take that as Gospel without doing research. I now No More about this then I need2
Yes there are a few exceptions to the rule.
Bottom line is based on Merrin's story about going to the seminary and becoming a priest - None NOT one of the Exceptions to the rule coincide with Pope granting a Married Man full Priesthood albeit the Pope (Protector of Pedophilia and Pedophiles) None fit in with what Merrin has said about how he decided to join a Seminary
Merrin says he went this route
None NOT one of those qualify for the Married Priest ''Exception"
Took a fair amount of reading to find all the Exceptions to cover my ass. So NOPE and again he is caught in one more lie about his Priesthood.
Plus it looks like he is coming to an end of that silly Shtick -
I am waiting for someone to claim they are King of some country and not telling us which country it is - Or maybe the Return of Jesus Christ.
Most of the exceptions and current Pope has as of YET to do one, and they ALL have to be done my the Pope and no one else
Full Episcopal Priests and mostly from USA - 120 In all but it's been years and years since the last conversion by a former Pope (Protector of Pedophilia and Pedophiles)
Wait speaking of Ordination I have something to share and working on a way to do that - later.
And you expected me to just take that as Gospel without doing research. I now No More about this then I need2
Yes there are a few exceptions to the rule.
Bottom line is based on Merrin's story about going to the seminary and becoming a priest - None NOT one of the Exceptions to the rule coincide with Pope granting a Married Man full Priesthood albeit the Pope (Protector of Pedophilia and Pedophiles) None fit in with what Merrin has said about how he decided to join a Seminary
Merrin says he went this route
How long is Catholic seminary?
five years
The degree takes five years and is preceded by a year of spiritual formation (plus learning of the ancient languages) and followed by two years of pastoral practice (during which the candidate is ordained to the deaconate). Usually, priests spend all of that time in a seminary except one "free year".
five years
The degree takes five years and is preceded by a year of spiritual formation (plus learning of the ancient languages) and followed by two years of pastoral practice (during which the candidate is ordained to the deaconate). Usually, priests spend all of that time in a seminary except one "free year".
None NOT one of those qualify for the Married Priest ''Exception"
Took a fair amount of reading to find all the Exceptions to cover my ass. So NOPE and again he is caught in one more lie about his Priesthood.
Plus it looks like he is coming to an end of that silly Shtick -
I am waiting for someone to claim they are King of some country and not telling us which country it is - Or maybe the Return of Jesus Christ.
Most of the exceptions and current Pope has as of YET to do one, and they ALL have to be done my the Pope and no one else
Full Episcopal Priests and mostly from USA - 120 In all but it's been years and years since the last conversion by a former Pope (Protector of Pedophilia and Pedophiles)
Wait speaking of Ordination I have something to share and working on a way to do that - later.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,328
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 21 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,336
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,339
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,394
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,450
@1,042,234 (G)
> I suspected Father Merrin was an Anglican convert and my suspicions have been confirmed!
Not quite but not far off.
> I suspected Father Merrin was an Anglican convert and my suspicions have been confirmed!
Not quite but not far off.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 6 years ago, 40 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,451
@1,042,252 (!!1YAr2FFMK)
> > > Have you never jovially thanked your mother-in-law for giving birth to your wife? I know I have.
> >I know I have.
>
> When did you drop your shtick?
Never, because it's not 'shtick'. And I have never hidden the fact I'm married.
> > > Have you never jovially thanked your mother-in-law for giving birth to your wife? I know I have.
> >I know I have.
>
> When did you drop your shtick?
Never, because it's not 'shtick'. And I have never hidden the fact I'm married.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U triple-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,453
@1,042,279 (H)
> >Have you never jovially thanked your mother-in-law for giving birth to your wife? I know I have.
> So you AREN'T a priest after all?
Yes I am. And may I say the ignorance that is being displayed here about the Catholic clergy is, I'm sad to say, not altogether surprising. Exhibit A (and what a shocking surprise it should come from him) being...
> >Have you never jovially thanked your mother-in-law for giving birth to your wife? I know I have.
> So you AREN'T a priest after all?
Yes I am. And may I say the ignorance that is being displayed here about the Catholic clergy is, I'm sad to say, not altogether surprising. Exhibit A (and what a shocking surprise it should come from him) being...
Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 57 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,455
I chose "can't disagree" because I can't disagree, but I also can't agree. The way I see it, there is no way that I could ever know for sure whether or not such a thing exists. I think it takes a pretty big ego for anyone to confidently say one way or the other. How could you ever possibly know with any level of certainty?
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,042,457
@1,042,327 (E)
> And you expected me to just take that as Gospel without doing research. I now No More about this then I need2
>
> Yes there are a few exceptions to the rule.
> Bottom line is based on Merrin's story about going to the seminary and becoming a priest - None NOT one of the Exceptions to the rule coincide with Pope granting a Married Man full Priesthood albeit the Pope (Protector of Pedophilia and Pedophiles) None fit in with what Merrin has said about how he decided to join a Seminary
>
> Merrin says he went this route
>
>
>
> None NOT one of those qualify for the Married Priest ''Exception"
>
> Took a fair amount of reading to find all the Exceptions to cover my ass. So NOPE and again he is caught in one more lie about his Priesthood.
>
> Plus it looks like he is coming to an end of that silly Shtick -
>
> I am waiting for someone to claim they are King of some country and not telling us which country it is - Or maybe the Return of Jesus Christ.
>
> Most of the exceptions and current Pope has as of YET to do one, and they ALL have to be done my the Pope and no one else
> Full Episcopal Priests and mostly from USA - 120 In all but it's been years and years since the last conversion by a former Pope (Protector of Pedophilia and Pedophiles)
>
> Wait speaking of Ordination I have something to share and working on a way to do that - later.
*sigh* Behold for the 12,000th time the perils of receiving your information from frantically skim-read Google searches.
> And you expected me to just take that as Gospel without doing research. I now No More about this then I need2
>
> Yes there are a few exceptions to the rule.
> Bottom line is based on Merrin's story about going to the seminary and becoming a priest - None NOT one of the Exceptions to the rule coincide with Pope granting a Married Man full Priesthood albeit the Pope (Protector of Pedophilia and Pedophiles) None fit in with what Merrin has said about how he decided to join a Seminary
>
> Merrin says he went this route
>
>
How long is Catholic seminary?
> five years
> The degree takes five years and is preceded by a year of spiritual formation (plus learning of the ancient languages) and followed by two years of pastoral practice (during which the candidate is ordained to the deaconate). Usually, priests spend all of that time in a seminary except one "free year".
> five years
> The degree takes five years and is preceded by a year of spiritual formation (plus learning of the ancient languages) and followed by two years of pastoral practice (during which the candidate is ordained to the deaconate). Usually, priests spend all of that time in a seminary except one "free year".
>
> None NOT one of those qualify for the Married Priest ''Exception"
>
> Took a fair amount of reading to find all the Exceptions to cover my ass. So NOPE and again he is caught in one more lie about his Priesthood.
>
> Plus it looks like he is coming to an end of that silly Shtick -
>
> I am waiting for someone to claim they are King of some country and not telling us which country it is - Or maybe the Return of Jesus Christ.
>
> Most of the exceptions and current Pope has as of YET to do one, and they ALL have to be done my the Pope and no one else
> Full Episcopal Priests and mostly from USA - 120 In all but it's been years and years since the last conversion by a former Pope (Protector of Pedophilia and Pedophiles)
>
> Wait speaking of Ordination I have something to share and working on a way to do that - later.
*sigh* Behold for the 12,000th time the perils of receiving your information from frantically skim-read Google searches.