Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Svet !jzYkdX7lIw replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,039,318
@previous (terri !RwordOooFE)
Then you are making the roux wrong. You need to stir it under heat to stop it burning but no need to whisk.
terri !RwordOooFE (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,039,319
@previous (Svet !jzYkdX7lIw)
what are you talking about. that's what you use a whisk for. that's what whisking is
Svet !jzYkdX7lIw replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,039,325
@previous (terri !RwordOooFE)
Stirring and whisking are different. You just got to keep moving the roux around slowly for about 30 to 40 minutes non stop to stop it burning.
terri !RwordOooFE (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 41 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,039,328
You posted a bowl of beef soup and claimed it was a gumbo.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,039,399
@1,039,325 (Svet !jzYkdX7lIw) > Stirring and whisking are different
As much as it pains me to agree with him, Svet kinda has a point here. Whisking generally introduces air into the substance (e.g. creams and meringues) and that is part of why whisks are designed the way they are. It's possible to stir things with a whisk, but I don't know if you still call it 'whisking' then.
terri !RwordOooFE (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 30 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,039,404