Topic: Kook

Svet !jzYkdX7lIw started this discussion 6 years ago #91,197

Have you ever shit on a patients pancakes?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #1,037,763

Quit being a disgusting pervert

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,770

@OP
I'm mad that you didn't ask her about waffles. Why only pancakes?

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,772

The preterite is shat, you imbecile.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,775

@previous (D)

It's actually shatted, or shaeted if you're being formal.

Real Indy replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,779

@previous (E)
Wrong, mora. I know my shit.

Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,781

@previous (Real Indy)

I think you don't, judging by your use of latinate -a for a Greek-root word, which should properly be rendered moroid

Real Indy replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,782

@previous (E)
A Greek word ending in -on, you mora.

Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,783

@previous (Real Indy)

The word moron comes from Greek moros, you caveman. Such a moroid.

(Edited 30 seconds later.)

Socrates joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,789

@previous (E)
WRONG.

Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,790

@previous (Socrates)

If i argued a man had feet, would it not be obvious that I should also be arguing that the feet are connected to the body which comes before it? I'll answer for you, because the answer is obviously yes. And so, if I say that a word is based on a separate word which came before it, is this now wrong?