Topic: Now that Grover has been banned...
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #91,193
Will Eco come and threaten to beat up the mods unless they unban Grover?
Or will Eco stick to his word about beating up child pedophiles, and destroy Grover?
Or will Eco stick to his word about beating up child pedophiles, and destroy Grover?
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #1,037,690
Surprising turn of events that one, I thought 'Grover' was just a run of the mill troll, I didn't expect him to write that bizarre thread that got him banned.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,695
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Surprising turn of events that one, I thought 'Grover' was just a run of the mill troll, I didn't expect him to write that bizarre thread that got him banned.
What did he write I missed it
> Surprising turn of events that one, I thought 'Grover' was just a run of the mill troll, I didn't expect him to write that bizarre thread that got him banned.
What did he write I missed it
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 28 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,697
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,698
Ok so I don't think he actually did. He seems to have just gone off the rails and wanted to get banned. He got what he wanted I guess.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,700
Yeah, I tend to think this was suicide by mod. I seriously doubt what he wrote was real, I think he'd just had enough and wanted to end it all.
(Edited 54 seconds later.)
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,806
At least he actually stated that he had committed pedophiles acts.I got banned by posting three kids in bathing kids and saying 'eye candy' and it was obviously a parody.
It was like when Larry Flint did that joke in Hustler about Jerry Falwell sexing his mother in the outhouse. It was a joke but the mods were triggered just like when Democrats see someone in blackface (other than a liberal) today.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
toni !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 26 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,819
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,826
@previous (toni !RwordOooFE)
It may not have been but the fact remains that to any sensible person who has seen me around here for a year or three...that it was not a post that encouraged nor endorsed pedophile actions or beliefs. It was obviously a silly parody of how people rib syntax about referring to younger ladies as eye candy.
The mods should have been more astute and treated it for what it is. I really am not sore about it...I'm just saying..
It may not have been but the fact remains that to any sensible person who has seen me around here for a year or three...that it was not a post that encouraged nor endorsed pedophile actions or beliefs. It was obviously a silly parody of how people rib syntax about referring to younger ladies as eye candy.
The mods should have been more astute and treated it for what it is. I really am not sore about it...I'm just saying..
(Edited 1 minute later.)
toni !RwordOooFE replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,829
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,831
@previous (toni !RwordOooFE)
It was a poc of Google images and it was not lewd.
The picture could have been posted in another context and nothing would have said.
It was a poc of Google images and it was not lewd.
The picture could have been posted in another context and nothing would have said.
(Edited 39 seconds later.)
toni !RwordOooFE replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,833
@previous (F)
lol what did you Google? id love to see your search history - twinks, underaged girls etc
pretty sure if anyone posted that photo in any context they'd get called out and banned like you were
lol what did you Google? id love to see your search history - twinks, underaged girls etc
pretty sure if anyone posted that photo in any context they'd get called out and banned like you were
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,839
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,846
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,849
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,853
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,855
Bobby2Sox !hSWro.0Z8M joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,902
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,925
@1,037,690 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Yeah, I'm done here guys and girls. It was fun but now it's not. Child abuse is where I draw the line. Bye.
Yeah, I'm done here guys and girls. It was fun but now it's not. Child abuse is where I draw the line. Bye.