Minichan

Topic: ATTN: fellow minichanner

Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #91,167

The climate change people want you to eat less meat. They are coming for your diet and will most likely win. From now on you got to eat as much red meat as you can while you can.

Green !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 hours later[^] [v] #1,037,425

Nah. They'll never stop the meat industry.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,427

Yeah, but at least Bernie wants to abort all the black and brown babies in the third world. It might not stop global warming but it's the right thing to do

Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,431

Eating meat isn't even the problem with the world

Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,436

@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Dems’ global warming solution: Ban straws, red meat, gas-powered cars, incandescent bulbs, nuclear energy, fracking, natural gas exports, off-shore drilling, factory farming, and … “carbon"

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,439

@1,037,431 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Factory farming is a pretty big problem with the world ethically and environmentally.

(Edited 12 minutes later.)

Bilbo !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,441

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)

Ideally we need to cull the human population. Just build a big wall around China, I say.

Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,450

@previous (Bilbo !RwordOooFE)
I like the way you think. Abort all the black babies! Sanders - Thanos 2020

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 41 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,471

@1,037,436 (C)
Any input on the carbon footprint of strawman arguments?

Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,508

@previous (G)
That's just the takeaway from the Democrats global warming talk on CNN. It looks like Trump wins again!

Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 6 years ago, 43 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,520

@1,037,439 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Eating meat =\= factory farming, moving the goalposts doesn't help anything. No one hwre is saying that factory farming and monocropping are good ideas but its an agriculture issue, and should have no relevance on being a carnivore or not

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,521

@1,037,439 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
No it isn't, dickhead. Man the fuck up.

Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,523

@previous (H)
Hes not wrong that our global agricultural methods have a huge impact on the environment

Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 20 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,526

@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Have fun trying to eat fucking rainforest trees you fucking dumbass.

Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 6 years ago, 52 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,529

@previous (H)
Wow that's not even the fucking point, there's monocropping in UsAmerica that has nothing to do with deforestation in the fucking rainforest

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,530

@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)

I like how he thinks that our only other option would be to eat mahogany, tho.

Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 55 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,541

@1,037,508 (C)
> That's just the takeaway from the Democrats global warming talk on CNN.
How is that a takeaway? You watched people talk about it and then made up stuff to complain about? That just sounds like you being a partisan twit who makes shit up to cry about.

Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 43 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,543

@1,037,529 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
You said global agriculture, dipshit.

Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 6 years ago, 58 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,547

@previous (H)
And the rainforest deforestation Is only a small fraction of the damage that's being done by the global agriculture, what are you not following here?

toni !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 33 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,548

@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)

> And the rainforest deforestation Is only a small fraction of the damage that's being done by the global agriculture, what are you not following here?

GOSH

Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,551

@previous (toni !RwordOooFE)

> > And the rainforest deforestation Is only a small fraction of the damage that's being done by the global agriculture, what are you not following here?
>
> GOSH

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,557

@1,037,547 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Go hug a tree wannabe dirty hippy boy. Btw, lots pot farmers use a shit ton of Roundup you addled pothead.

Anonymous K double-posted this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,558

@1,037,547 (Dead !Pool..v42s)


And

https://www.fs.fed.us/features/forest-service-scientists-do-some-serious-sleuthing-detect-illegal-marijuana-grow-sites

Anonymous K triple-posted this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,559

@1,037,547 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
And
You work for people who are hurting the earth dumbass

https://daily.jstor.org/the-environmental-downside-of-cannabis-cultivation/

Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,037,564

@1,037,547 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Why do you hate progress and prosperity so much?

(Edited 24 seconds later.)

Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 6 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,036

@1,037,557 (K)
Most of the pot farmers I know personally are doing organic grows

@1,037,559 (K)
I'm not working for the people trying to make millions of dollars off pot each year, so try to come at me a different way

@previous (H)
If you support an industrial ban of marijuana, you are impeding progress and prosperity yourself, you have no argument that means anything.

Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 30 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,041

@1,037,558 (K)
> https://www.fs.fed.us/features/forest-service-scientists-do-some-serious-sleuthing-detect-illegal-marijuana-grow-sites
@1,037,559 (K)
> https://daily.jstor.org/the-environmental-downside-of-cannabis-cultivation/
These articles are about the negative effects of illegal trespass grow operations, not cannabis growers in general. That's like pretending all alcohol comes from hillbilly moonshiners. Did you just wildly google for articles about the negative environmental impacts of pot and come up with these?

Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 33 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,051

@1,037,541 (G)
No, I copied a tweet and pasted it here.

Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,069

@previous (C)
Twitter is just a less exciting clone of Minichan with stricter character limits.

You should avoid that place.

(Edited 26 seconds later.)

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,072

op is a gullible retard

Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,139

@1,038,036 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
A workforce of doped up junkies would be very bad for progress and prosperity. Stop making excuses for your addiction and get help.

Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,143

@1,038,069 (G)

https://twitter.com/i/status/1169635077216714753

Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,152

Externally hosted image

Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,159

@1,038,139 (H)
Addicted to work? I dont think that's treatable

Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,164

@1,038,143 (C)
Yeah, definitely stay away from losers like that on Twitter.

Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,182

@1,038,159 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Your reefer madness is flaring up.

Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,184

@previous (H)
At least I don't have chronic sadness

Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,207

@1,038,164 (G)

> How is that a takeaway? You watched people talk about it and then made up stuff to complain about? That just sounds like you being a partisan twit who makes shit up to cry about.

And yet there is a video of them saying exactly that. It's like they are working for trumps re-election campaign.

Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,210

@previous (C)
You should really avoid Twitter dipshits who mistake out of context clipshows for news.

Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,211

@previous (G)
So you did watch the video of them answering questions. Thanks

Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,214

@previous (C)
Yeah, it's pretty unimpressive. The bizarre climate denier comments were pretty funny though.

Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,217

@previous (G)

> Dems’ global warming solution: Ban straws, red meat, gas-powered cars, incandescent bulbs, nuclear energy, fracking, natural gas exports, off-shore drilling, factory farming, and … “carbon"

Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,220

@previous (C)
You should probably leave reposting lame shit from Twitter to the bots.

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,223

@1,037,425 (Green !StaYqkzUPc)

This.

Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,038,242

@1,038,220 (G)
How is that a takeaway? You watched people talk about it and then made up stuff to complain about? That just sounds like you being a partisan twit who makes shit up to cry about.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.