Notice: Proxies are blocked from creating accounts. Please visit the site without using a proxy first or restore your ID.

Minichan

Topic: **FIRST-WORLD PROBLEMS: DRUG DEALERS REFUSE TO GIVE SPOTS, FRONTS, CUFF'S, OR PRODUCT ON-CREDIT!*

Eco started this discussion 5 years ago #90,584

Externally hosted imageA COUPLE PEOPLE REFUSE TO PAY BACK THEIR DRUG DEALERS FOR THE SPOTS THEY RECEIVED, AND THEY RUIN THE CREDIT-SYSTEM FOR US DRUGGIES WHO PAY BACK OUR FRONTS!!!

WHAT IS A CRACKHEAD/METH-MONGER/SPUNKY-JUNKIE TO DO??

I GET PAID AT THE END OF THE MONTH, AND MY MONEY IS GUARANTEED, SO I SOMETIMES NEED A SPOT TO LAST ME UNTIL THEN!!!

A FEW OF MY DEALERS WILL GIVE ME PRODUCT ON-CREDIT BECAUSE I HAVE A HISTORY WITH THEM, AND THEY KNOW THAT I AM SOLID, BUT MORE AND MORE DEALERS ARE SAYING THEY DON'T GIVE FRONTS! THIS COULD BE THE BIGGEST PROBLEM THAT OUR GENERATION FACES!!!

introman !/3ZwFHfJFI joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 32 minutes later[^] [v] #1,031,180

Why don't you make a junkie credit app and get that tech money? Every drug dealer would buy it to have a database of junkies they can trust and which ones not to trust.

Eco joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,031,212

@previous (introman !/3ZwFHfJFI)

> Why don't you make a junkie credit app and get that tech money? Every drug dealer would buy it to have a database of junkies they can trust and which ones not to trust.

Thanks for the SICK IDEA, introman!

I know a lot of my dealer buddies who could use an app to keep track of who owes them what...and i don't think creating said app would be outside of my technical expertise either!

Heehee and Haha !jqisBa6E7w joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,031,264

The reason is that drug buyers are not in the upper echelon of society's most trustworthy, responsible people, and the likelihood of an addict never paying back the credit account, are unusually high.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 3 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,031,322

FUCK OFF PEDOPHILE

Eco (OP) replied with this 5 years ago, 12 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,031,331

@previous (E)

> FUCK OFF PEDOPHILE

THIS UNORIGINAL IDIOT HAS NO FUCKING LIFE APPARENTLY, CONSIDERING HE POSTS "fuck off pedophile" ON EVERY THREAD I MAKE...DESPITE REPEATED REQUESTS FOR ANY PROOF THAT I DIDDLE KIDS...KEEP CHIRPING FROM BEHIND A COMPUTER TOUGH GUY; I WOULD SMASH YOU IN REAL LIFE!

Anonymous E replied with this 5 years ago, 13 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,031,344

@previous (Eco)

> I DIDDLE KIDS...

Nice admittance! But we already knew you did.

> KEEP CHIRPING FROM BEHIND A COMPUTER TOUGH GUY; I WOULD SMASH YOU IN REAL LIFE!

Isn't this pretty much what you said about the alleged child molester/woman beater?

P.S. FUCK OFF PEDOPHILE

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 5 years ago, 13 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,031,351

Eco has a 24 inch waist and wears a size 8 shoe.
He's like a man but smaller.

(Edited 11 seconds later.)

Eco replied with this 5 years ago, 36 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,031,360

@previous (F)

> Eco has a 24 inch waist and wears a size 8 shoe.
> He's like a man but smaller.

CORRECTION: I wear a size 29-30 waist and 9-9.5 shoe DUMBASS!
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.