Topic: Yes or No question about transexuals
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #90,037
Do you think it should be unlawful for an Owner of a business to fire a hairy masculine looking Male employee that starts coming in to work wearing makeup, with a woman's hair style and wearing a skirt and high high heels?
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #1,026,412
I see the Lefties are taking time to come up with some kind of rational explanation to answer No.Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,419
What's it gonna be fora Yes or No?
terri !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,421
shut up Bert
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,424
Remember, you thought it was a splendid idea to strike down the States' bans prohibiting the gays from lawful marriage.So I guess you get to have hairy men named Carl or Frank in the customer relations areas of the businesses you own wearing pretty dresses while sporting a nice dark five o'clock shadow.
Congratulations.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,428
@OP
> Do you think it should be unlawful for an Owner of a business to fire a hairy masculine looking Male employee that starts coming in to work wearing makeup, with a woman's hair style and wearing a skirt and high high heels?
Appears to be a good question until I ask this.
So business owner hires bert. bert shows up for work and two days later he hurts his hand because he came to work drunk as all fuck. Few days later bert shows up for work so drunk he hurts his foot trying to kick the owner in the butt. Few days later bert takes one of his male workmates into the closet and tries to rape him. berts drunk penis fails to penetrate and bert files a workers compensation claim for penis breakage, while on the job.
bert files for unemployment and is denied because the rape and work were not completed. bert continues to drink drunk while pretending to look for a new job.
This all pleases berts mother because she is unable to shower and care for herself and bert unfamiliar with females is happy to learn yada yada yada.
> Do you think it should be unlawful for an Owner of a business to fire a hairy masculine looking Male employee that starts coming in to work wearing makeup, with a woman's hair style and wearing a skirt and high high heels?
Appears to be a good question until I ask this.
So business owner hires bert. bert shows up for work and two days later he hurts his hand because he came to work drunk as all fuck. Few days later bert shows up for work so drunk he hurts his foot trying to kick the owner in the butt. Few days later bert takes one of his male workmates into the closet and tries to rape him. berts drunk penis fails to penetrate and bert files a workers compensation claim for penis breakage, while on the job.
bert files for unemployment and is denied because the rape and work were not completed. bert continues to drink drunk while pretending to look for a new job.
This all pleases berts mother because she is unable to shower and care for herself and bert unfamiliar with females is happy to learn yada yada yada.
chill dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,430
why would their choice of dress affect the quality of their work
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,432
@previous (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Because it would be extremely offensive to a large percentage of customers who would immediately stop using the services of that business.
That's how.
Because it would be extremely offensive to a large percentage of customers who would immediately stop using the services of that business.
That's how.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 seconds later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,433
@1,026,430 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)
> why would their choice of dress affect the quality of their work
Because it’s weird and people don’t like being around weird things
> why would their choice of dress affect the quality of their work
Because it’s weird and people don’t like being around weird things
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,437
@1,026,430 (chill dog !!81dzJNNYL)In the case before the Supreme court it does. That person once only worked behind the scenes as the embalmer. Was eventually promoted to director, a position that has the director in contact with potential customers.
I think it comes down to - Does the owner want potential customers to see this person on the right, as the person that represents the business. That person as depicted in the photo is not the person the owner hired Exactly
terri !RwordOooFE replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,439
@previous (F)
> In the case before the Supreme court it does. That person once only worked behind the scenes as the embalmer. Was eventually promoted to director, a position that has the director in contact with potential customers.
>
> I think it comes down to - Does the owner want potential customers to see this person on the right, as the person that represents the business. That person as depicted in the photo is not the person the owner hired Exactly
looks like a normal fat lady to me!!!
> In the case before the Supreme court it does. That person once only worked behind the scenes as the embalmer. Was eventually promoted to director, a position that has the director in contact with potential customers.
>
> I think it comes down to - Does the owner want potential customers to see this person on the right, as the person that represents the business. That person as depicted in the photo is not the person the owner hired Exactly
looks like a normal fat lady to me!!!
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,440
@1,026,432 (A)
> Because it would be extremely offensive to a large percentage of customers who would immediately stop using the services of that business.
> That's how.
Which is why you cannot keep a job. They hire you and then discover you're too weak and lazy to do your job. Your history of injury on the job is proof employers should never hire you.
> Because it would be extremely offensive to a large percentage of customers who would immediately stop using the services of that business.
> That's how.
Which is why you cannot keep a job. They hire you and then discover you're too weak and lazy to do your job. Your history of injury on the job is proof employers should never hire you.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,441
@previous (G)
Bert said he had two normally scheduled shifts off after that injury and reported to work on time for the next scheduled shift, like a Man.
Bert said he had two normally scheduled shifts off after that injury and reported to work on time for the next scheduled shift, like a Man.
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,443
WSD !m2cp3rR5zw joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,448
I'm guessing it'll be sent back to be decided at the state level, keeping the status quo of letting the states decide. Since the county she was employed in penalizes antilgbt businesses with a fine of $500 I imagine that will be what they will settle for.
vocalon joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,557
ITT: normal posts by healthy people
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,558
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,561
vocalon replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,562
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
i think some therapy would do you some good, you're clearly very angry online about people you've never met
i think some therapy would do you some good, you're clearly very angry online about people you've never met
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,563
@previous (vocalon)
And you're easily upset, and seek to have opinions that you don't like, shut down
And you're easily upset, and seek to have opinions that you don't like, shut down
vocalon replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,565
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,566
Autist !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 57 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,567
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 31 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,570
@1,026,562 (vocalon)
@1,026,563 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Loving how this classic rivalry is back. It's like I'm back in Minichan's middle period. Just a very, very classic vibe right now.
@1,026,563 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Loving how this classic rivalry is back. It's like I'm back in Minichan's middle period. Just a very, very classic vibe right now.
vocalon replied with this 6 years ago, 19 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,574
@1,026,566 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
have you joined any particularly fundamentalist christian churches in hopes of finding people who agree with you about the degenerate trans menace or is that still a far ways off
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
between this and matt shtick at it as always, we're playing ALL the hits
have you joined any particularly fundamentalist christian churches in hopes of finding people who agree with you about the degenerate trans menace or is that still a far ways off
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
between this and matt shtick at it as always, we're playing ALL the hits
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,576
@previous (vocalon)
Can you play some stuff from "Trolling Anontalk" next? Absolutely love that one. "Traitorous Wiseguys" is an all-time favourite.
Can you play some stuff from "Trolling Anontalk" next? Absolutely love that one. "Traitorous Wiseguys" is an all-time favourite.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,578
@1,026,574 (vocalon)
If you think that only church people believe these things, you gave been on tumblr for far too long
If you think that only church people believe these things, you gave been on tumblr for far too long
(Edited 36 seconds later.)
vocalon replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,581
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)oh i don't, by any means, it's just one of the steps in the radfem to tradwife pipeline and i'm curious where you are in your transition
@1,026,576 (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
i've got the homestar leak backed up, that one's a classic.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,586
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,588
@1,026,581 (vocalon)
Oh man, that whole saga was a trip. Probably my funniest memory of the place.
Fucking Kimmo bans like three of his mods out of paranoia and anger, two of whom come to MC and TC respectively and leak loads of stuff. Those roundtable chats were hilarious.
Meanwhile, he's left with one Wiseguy (Chickenflipper), who everyone then starts trying to gaslight Kimmo into thinking is also a traitor. Hahaha, I don't remember what came of that, but I bet it worked.
Oh, fuck. Those were the days. Almost a shame you struck that killing blow, Voc, but I think it was coming to an end anyways.
Oh man, that whole saga was a trip. Probably my funniest memory of the place.
Fucking Kimmo bans like three of his mods out of paranoia and anger, two of whom come to MC and TC respectively and leak loads of stuff. Those roundtable chats were hilarious.
Meanwhile, he's left with one Wiseguy (Chickenflipper), who everyone then starts trying to gaslight Kimmo into thinking is also a traitor. Hahaha, I don't remember what came of that, but I bet it worked.
Oh, fuck. Those were the days. Almost a shame you struck that killing blow, Voc, but I think it was coming to an end anyways.
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,591
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
Oh, another favourite memory of mine: that Wiseguy screenshot where Kimmo muses about making something to wake him up if there's a user report while he's asleep.
Oh, another favourite memory of mine: that Wiseguy screenshot where Kimmo muses about making something to wake him up if there's a user report while he's asleep.
vocalon replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,595
@1,026,588 (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
yeah, i've been thinking about that a lot, esp since the perceived problem itself never really went away. like, even after AnT died, to4str and matt and fuckin, the scat dude were still around, fostering the exact same shit in a different place, and even now, in ostensibly "puritanical" cultures like the circles i'm in off this site, hives of pedophiles spring up and all you can really do about it is bitch on twitter and warn others not to chill, which is like. nothing.
@1,026,586 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
rafters aren't high enough for me to get my feet off the ground, this is transphobia at its finest
yeah, i've been thinking about that a lot, esp since the perceived problem itself never really went away. like, even after AnT died, to4str and matt and fuckin, the scat dude were still around, fostering the exact same shit in a different place, and even now, in ostensibly "puritanical" cultures like the circles i'm in off this site, hives of pedophiles spring up and all you can really do about it is bitch on twitter and warn others not to chill, which is like. nothing.
@1,026,586 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
rafters aren't high enough for me to get my feet off the ground, this is transphobia at its finest
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,598
@previous (vocalon)
Transphobia? Don't try and trade insults if there are things that you'd prefer not reading. Thanks
Transphobia? Don't try and trade insults if there are things that you'd prefer not reading. Thanks
Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,600
@1,026,595 (vocalon)
In fairness, when anyone tries to bring pedoshit onto here, it gets shut down very quickly. The mods are very diligent on that.
But anyway, from a pedo-stopping perspective, you did a little good, I think. For years after AT went down, we'd have creepy former AT users wandering into here since the AT URL got redirected to Minichan. The mods just quietly banned them, but it does show that AT was a congregating point for people like that.
In fairness, when anyone tries to bring pedoshit onto here, it gets shut down very quickly. The mods are very diligent on that.
But anyway, from a pedo-stopping perspective, you did a little good, I think. For years after AT went down, we'd have creepy former AT users wandering into here since the AT URL got redirected to Minichan. The mods just quietly banned them, but it does show that AT was a congregating point for people like that.
(Edited 57 seconds later.)
vocalon replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,606
@1,026,598 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
it's your fault i'm too tall to hang myself from my rafters you know
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
ye, ye. it's just weird bc like. sure did deal with to4str for a lot longer than anyone'd like, sure did fuck me up somethin bad
it's your fault i'm too tall to hang myself from my rafters you know
@previous (Killer Lettuce? !HonkUK.BIE)
ye, ye. it's just weird bc like. sure did deal with to4str for a lot longer than anyone'd like, sure did fuck me up somethin bad
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,608
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,634
I'm trans, and I love you, Kook.