Topic: ionize tg2merrin
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #89,975
ionize tg2merrin
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| ionize tg2merrin | 2 | 14% | |
| ionize tg2merrin | 10 | 71% | |
| ionize tg2merrin | 2 | 14% |
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,025,651
I voted!
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,654
This is something like the 10th time you've made this thread. You'd think that would have told you something by now.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,657
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Priests accused of sex abuse turned to under-the-radar group
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/priests-accused-of-sex-abuse-turned-to-under-the-radar-group/ar-AAF0D5i
Priests accused of sex abuse turned to under-the-radar group
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/priests-accused-of-sex-abuse-turned-to-under-the-radar-group/ar-AAF0D5i
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,660
@previous (D)
> Priests accused of sex abuse turned to under-the-radar group
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/priests-accused-of-sex-abuse-turned-to-under-the-radar-group/ar-AAF0D5i
? ?
> Priests accused of sex abuse turned to under-the-radar group
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/priests-accused-of-sex-abuse-turned-to-under-the-radar-group/ar-AAF0D5i
? ?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,664
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,665
@1,025,657 (D)
> Priests accused of sex abuse turned to under-the-radar group
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/priests-accused-of-sex-abuse-turned-to-under-the-radar-group/ar-AAF0D5i
I don't know who you are friend, but honest to goodness, sometimes I think you'll be posting that link of yours 30 years from now!
> Priests accused of sex abuse turned to under-the-radar group
> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/priests-accused-of-sex-abuse-turned-to-under-the-radar-group/ar-AAF0D5i
I don't know who you are friend, but honest to goodness, sometimes I think you'll be posting that link of yours 30 years from now!
Father Dougal !6NTUB/SA/. joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,667
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,668
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 5 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,669
@1,025,667 (Father Dougal !6NTUB/SA/.)
I'm presuming you've sent me a picture because I'm seeing a blank message. I have images disabled on this site, sorry!
I'm presuming you've sent me a picture because I'm seeing a blank message. I have images disabled on this site, sorry!
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 45 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,670
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 11 seconds later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,671
@1,025,665 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > Priests accused of sex abuse turned to under-the-radar group
> > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/priests-accused-of-sex-abuse-turned-to-under-the-radar-group/ar-AAF0D5i
>
> I don't know who you are friend, but honest to goodness, sometimes I think you'll be posting that link of yours 30 years from now!
He won't have too. More children will be molested by Catholic priests.
> > Priests accused of sex abuse turned to under-the-radar group
> > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/priests-accused-of-sex-abuse-turned-to-under-the-radar-group/ar-AAF0D5i
>
> I don't know who you are friend, but honest to goodness, sometimes I think you'll be posting that link of yours 30 years from now!
He won't have too. More children will be molested by Catholic priests.
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 22 seconds later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,672
@1,025,668 (H)
I know, what can I say other than "I'm Matt Miller and I'm a weird nonce"? I admit it.
I know, what can I say other than "I'm Matt Miller and I'm a weird nonce"? I admit it.
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 14 seconds later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,673
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 33 seconds later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,674
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,675
@1,025,671 (H)
Not all Priests are Pedophiles. A few are heterosexual and they rape nuns and force them to have abortions,.
Not all Priests are Pedophiles. A few are heterosexual and they rape nuns and force them to have abortions,.
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 46 seconds later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,676
@previous (J)
> Not all Priests are Pedophiles. A few are heterosexual and they rape nuns and force them to have abortions,.
True. I forgot about that one.
> Not all Priests are Pedophiles. A few are heterosexual and they rape nuns and force them to have abortions,.
True. I forgot about that one.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,677
@1,025,673 (H)
> > I have images disabled on this site, sorry!
>
> Liar
No. Priests don't lie. I have images disabled.
> > I have images disabled on this site, sorry!
>
> Liar
No. Priests don't lie. I have images disabled.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,679
@1,025,671 (H)
This...
> > > Priests accused of sex abuse turned to under-the-radar group
> > > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/priests-accused-of-sex-abuse-turned-to-under-the-radar-group/ar-AAF0D5i
> >
> > I don't know who you are friend, but honest to goodness, sometimes I think you'll be posting that link of yours 30 years from now!
...engendered this:
> He won't have too. More children will be molested by Catholic priests.
And that, boys and girls, is what we Latin scholars call a non sequitur.
This...
> > > Priests accused of sex abuse turned to under-the-radar group
> > > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/priests-accused-of-sex-abuse-turned-to-under-the-radar-group/ar-AAF0D5i
> >
> > I don't know who you are friend, but honest to goodness, sometimes I think you'll be posting that link of yours 30 years from now!
...engendered this:
> He won't have too. More children will be molested by Catholic priests.
And that, boys and girls, is what we Latin scholars call a non sequitur.
Father Dougal !6NTUB/SA/. replied with this 6 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,692
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,697
@1,025,679 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> non sequitur.
Oh, so you do actually know at least two words of Latin.
> non sequitur.
Oh, so you do actually know at least two words of Latin.
Father Dougal !6NTUB/SA/. replied with this 6 years ago, 48 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,025,706
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 19 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,035
@previous (Father Dougal !6NTUB/SA/.)
> He doesn't know it's latin.
See:
@1,025,679 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> And that, boys and girls, is what we Latin scholars call a non sequitur.
You're not very bright are you? :)
> He doesn't know it's latin.
See:
@1,025,679 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> And that, boys and girls, is what we Latin scholars call a non sequitur.
You're not very bright are you? :)
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,037
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
We here are bright enough to see know when your phony priest shtick, is just shtick.
We also know you're a pedophile.
We here are bright enough to see know when your phony priest shtick, is just shtick.
We also know you're a pedophile.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,038
@previous (L)
> We here are bright enough to see know
Just listen and think to go and you're ready to cross a road.
> We here are bright enough to see know
Just listen and think to go and you're ready to cross a road.
tteh !MemesToDNA joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,052
@OP
no he's my main man
no he's my main man
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 26 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,053
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,055
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,057
I will ban him the moment someone points out, specifically, what conduct of his is banworthy. If I don't like him that's not a bannable offense. If I banned everyone I don't like there would be like 7 users here.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,058
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 9 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,059
@1,026,053 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
<3
@1,026,057 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I'm surprised anybody would be left tbh.
<3
@1,026,057 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I'm surprised anybody would be left tbh.
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,061
@1,026,057 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Topics such as these are of value. They make a great place to point out the $$$$Billions spent by the Catholic Church in its quest to protect pedophile priests. There are of course Catholic priests that just rape nuns.
TGcomix will come back at me with eye candy a line he picked up from another MC Pedophile aka Indy.
Pedophiles such as him have to have other pedos taking his back so to speak.
Anyone that wants to look up define eye candy is free to read a dictionary
Topics such as these are of value. They make a great place to point out the $$$$Billions spent by the Catholic Church in its quest to protect pedophile priests. There are of course Catholic priests that just rape nuns.
TGcomix will come back at me with eye candy a line he picked up from another MC Pedophile aka Indy.
Pedophiles such as him have to have other pedos taking his back so to speak.
Anyone that wants to look up define eye candy is free to read a dictionary
(Edited 38 seconds later.)
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,062
@1,026,057 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I guarantee you if we found and posted say his shitty hentai you would delete the images and ban the person who posted it immediately. See, he knows he's safe because attempting to prove he's a filthy pedo would mean his accuser would have to do something illegal by, say, owning and sharing his CP. He would also then use it as evidence, as usual, that his accusers are pedos and not him.
But by all means, carry on enabling pedophiles like him on this site if you feel that the user count is more important.
I guarantee you if we found and posted say his shitty hentai you would delete the images and ban the person who posted it immediately. See, he knows he's safe because attempting to prove he's a filthy pedo would mean his accuser would have to do something illegal by, say, owning and sharing his CP. He would also then use it as evidence, as usual, that his accusers are pedos and not him.
But by all means, carry on enabling pedophiles like him on this site if you feel that the user count is more important.
Anonymous P replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,070
@previous (K)
Not that I disagree with you at all. Just that without TGComix, very few here get to view the horrid nature of the Catholic Church - Sure they see it in the daily news.
Merrin is one of two well known Pedos on MC.
Merrin makes a better target and targets have value. Which is why I did not vote in this poll.
Not that I disagree with you at all. Just that without TGComix, very few here get to view the horrid nature of the Catholic Church - Sure they see it in the daily news.
Merrin is one of two well known Pedos on MC.
Merrin makes a better target and targets have value. Which is why I did not vote in this poll.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,075
@1,026,062 (K)
I would ban anyone who posted real or fictional lewd depictions of underaged people. I don't recommend doing that. The fact that he allegedly does that elsewhere isn't bannable here. I don't like the guy. If I saw him drowning in a lake I'd find a bench and read the newspaper, but I'm not gonna ban him until he does something banworthy here.
@1,026,061 (P)
I'm also not going to ban a pretend priest because the church is full of child molesters. I probably would ban the pope just because it would be funny and it would make for a great story.
I would ban anyone who posted real or fictional lewd depictions of underaged people. I don't recommend doing that. The fact that he allegedly does that elsewhere isn't bannable here. I don't like the guy. If I saw him drowning in a lake I'd find a bench and read the newspaper, but I'm not gonna ban him until he does something banworthy here.
@1,026,061 (P)
I'm also not going to ban a pretend priest because the church is full of child molesters. I probably would ban the pope just because it would be funny and it would make for a great story.
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,077
@1,026,062 (K)
The thing is, we level bans entirely on how users behave on this site. How a person conducts themselves elsewhere, or is alleged to have conducted themselves elsewhere, really doesn't matter.
The thing is, we level bans entirely on how users behave on this site. How a person conducts themselves elsewhere, or is alleged to have conducted themselves elsewhere, really doesn't matter.
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 24 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,078
@1,026,062 (K)
> I guarantee you if we found and posted say his shitty hentai you would delete the images and ban the person who posted it immediately. See, he knows he's safe because attempting to prove he's a filthy pedo would mean his accuser would have to do something illegal by, say, owning and sharing his CP. He would also then use it as evidence, as usual, that his accusers are pedos and not him.
>
> But by all means, carry on enabling pedophiles like him on this site if you feel that the user count is more important.
lol what a meltdown.
> I guarantee you if we found and posted say his shitty hentai you would delete the images and ban the person who posted it immediately. See, he knows he's safe because attempting to prove he's a filthy pedo would mean his accuser would have to do something illegal by, say, owning and sharing his CP. He would also then use it as evidence, as usual, that his accusers are pedos and not him.
>
> But by all means, carry on enabling pedophiles like him on this site if you feel that the user count is more important.
lol what a meltdown.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,083
@1,026,062 (K)
> I guarantee you if we found and posted say his shitty hentai you would delete the images and ban the person who posted it immediately. See, he knows he's safe because attempting to prove he's a filthy pedo would mean his accuser would have to do something illegal by, say, owning and sharing his CP. He would also then use it as evidence, as usual, that his accusers are pedos and not him.
What you're effectively saying here is that you have viewed 'CP' online. Disgusting. I shall pray for you.
> I guarantee you if we found and posted say his shitty hentai you would delete the images and ban the person who posted it immediately. See, he knows he's safe because attempting to prove he's a filthy pedo would mean his accuser would have to do something illegal by, say, owning and sharing his CP. He would also then use it as evidence, as usual, that his accusers are pedos and not him.
What you're effectively saying here is that you have viewed 'CP' online. Disgusting. I shall pray for you.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,084
@1,026,075 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> If I saw him drowning in a lake I'd find a bench and read the newspaper
As useful a reaction as any, since God would surely rescue me!
> If I saw him drowning in a lake I'd find a bench and read the newspaper
As useful a reaction as any, since God would surely rescue me!
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U triple-posted this 6 years ago, 59 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,086
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,090
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,093
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> I would never want to interfere with the Lord's plan.
Wise my friend, very wise.
> I would never want to interfere with the Lord's plan.
Wise my friend, very wise.
tteh !MemesToDNA replied with this 6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,095
@1,026,075 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> If I saw him drowning in a lake I'd find a bench and read the newspaper
To craft a little newspaper boat to attend to the emergency immediately. Good thinking, lad.
> If I saw him drowning in a lake I'd find a bench and read the newspaper
To craft a little newspaper boat to attend to the emergency immediately. Good thinking, lad.
Anonymous H replied with this 6 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,121
@1,026,090 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> I would never want to interfere with the Lord's plan.
I would throw said bench on top of TG to help the Lord's plan to drown him go more quickly.
> I would never want to interfere with the Lord's plan.
I would throw said bench on top of TG to help the Lord's plan to drown him go more quickly.
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,124
@1,026,078 (F)
> lol what a meltdown
You have a strange idea of what a meltdown looks like... or you're a TGComix sockpuppet... yup, I'm going to go with the sockpuppet theory.
@1,026,083 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > He would also then use it as evidence, as usual, that his accusers are pedos and not him.
> What you're effectively saying here is that you have viewed 'CP' online.
Most people who know exactly who and what you are have seen your old deviant art page (which by the way you used to argue vehemently was not CP) and in my case only because it was shoved in my face.
You are so very predictable. Thank you for confirming what I just said you would probably do.
> lol what a meltdown
You have a strange idea of what a meltdown looks like... or you're a TGComix sockpuppet... yup, I'm going to go with the sockpuppet theory.
@1,026,083 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > He would also then use it as evidence, as usual, that his accusers are pedos and not him.
> What you're effectively saying here is that you have viewed 'CP' online.
Most people who know exactly who and what you are have seen your old deviant art page (which by the way you used to argue vehemently was not CP) and in my case only because it was shoved in my face.
You are so very predictable. Thank you for confirming what I just said you would probably do.
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,125
@previous (K)
> > What you're effectively saying here is that you have viewed 'CP' online.
> only because it was shoved in my face.
You're going with that excuse eh? Sorry my boy, I don't think that'll hold up in court :) I shall continue to pray for you.
> > What you're effectively saying here is that you have viewed 'CP' online.
> only because it was shoved in my face.
You're going with that excuse eh? Sorry my boy, I don't think that'll hold up in court :) I shall continue to pray for you.
(Edited 23 seconds later.)
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,126
I don't even think that Dave is TG. They did have a similar obnoxious tone when they trolled, but I doubt a pedo like TG could suddenly cut the pedophilia out of his persona.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,127
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,129
Anonymous E replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,132
@1,026,126 (Q)
> I don't even think that Dave is TG. They did have a similar obnoxious tone when they trolled, but I doubt a pedo like TG could suddenly cut the pedophilia out of his persona.
There was a period of time where they both posted at the same time and there was an overlap
> I don't even think that Dave is TG. They did have a similar obnoxious tone when they trolled, but I doubt a pedo like TG could suddenly cut the pedophilia out of his persona.
There was a period of time where they both posted at the same time and there was an overlap
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,142
@1,026,035 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Which is why it's so funny that you didn't even know it's a Latin phrase you stupid pedocunt.
Which is why it's so funny that you didn't even know it's a Latin phrase you stupid pedocunt.
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,144
@previous (G)
> Which is why it's so funny that you didn't even know it's a Latin phrase you stupid pedocunt.
What am I missing here? He literally called it a phrase used by "Latin scholars":
@1,025,679 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> And that, boys and girls, is what we Latin scholars call a non sequitur.
> Which is why it's so funny that you didn't even know it's a Latin phrase you stupid pedocunt.
What am I missing here? He literally called it a phrase used by "Latin scholars":
@1,025,679 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> And that, boys and girls, is what we Latin scholars call a non sequitur.
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,146
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,148
@1,026,144 (R)
The fact that it's a phrase Latin scholars use doesn't necessarily mean it's fucking Latin you fucking asshat.
The fact that it's a phrase Latin scholars use doesn't necessarily mean it's fucking Latin you fucking asshat.
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 46 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,165
@1,026,125 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
So you finally admit that your old "art", which you always denied was CP, is in fact CP? If not, then what exactly are you accusing me of?
So you finally admit that your old "art", which you always denied was CP, is in fact CP? If not, then what exactly are you accusing me of?
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,172
@1,026,142 (G)
> Which is why it's so funny that you didn't even know it's a Latin phrase you stupid pedoc*nt.
Let's walk you through this one more time shall we?
See:
@1,025,679 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> And that, boys and girls, is what we Latin scholars call a non sequitur.
> Latin scholars
> Latin
Understand? Contra spem spero ;)
> Which is why it's so funny that you didn't even know it's a Latin phrase you stupid pedoc*nt.
Let's walk you through this one more time shall we?
See:
@1,025,679 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> And that, boys and girls, is what we Latin scholars call a non sequitur.
> Latin scholars
> Latin
Understand? Contra spem spero ;)
Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 33 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,173
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,174
@1,026,165 (K)
> So you finally admit that your old "art", which you always denied was CP, is in fact CP?
To which "old art" are you referring?
> So you finally admit that your old "art", which you always denied was CP, is in fact CP?
To which "old art" are you referring?
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U double-posted this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,175
@1,026,173 (S)
> >it was shoved in my face.
>
> Please elaborate; how was it "shoved" in your face?
Yes indeed, this does seem to be a very suspicious plot hole in Anon K's story. "This CP that I claim to have seen was shoved in my face, Your Honor!"
I think he knows he's backed himself into a corner here by being tricked into admitting to viewing CP and he is now flailing hopelessly around. I call upon everyone here to join me in praying for him to give up his revolting, perverted and highly illegal online habits.
> >it was shoved in my face.
>
> Please elaborate; how was it "shoved" in your face?
Yes indeed, this does seem to be a very suspicious plot hole in Anon K's story. "This CP that I claim to have seen was shoved in my face, Your Honor!"
I think he knows he's backed himself into a corner here by being tricked into admitting to viewing CP and he is now flailing hopelessly around. I call upon everyone here to join me in praying for him to give up his revolting, perverted and highly illegal online habits.
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,177
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Lol. Gee you are on fire today, TG. What stunning wit, what a fine brain. Ladies and gents, we are in the presence of a true genius!
> To which "old art" are you referring?
I already said which. Do try to pay attention.
Lol. Gee you are on fire today, TG. What stunning wit, what a fine brain. Ladies and gents, we are in the presence of a true genius!
> To which "old art" are you referring?
I already said which. Do try to pay attention.
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,178
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,180
@1,026,177 (K)
> Ladies and gents, we are in the presence of a true genius!
Honor virtutis praemium :)
> > To which "old art" are you referring?
> I already said which.
You described some images you've been looking at that you claim are CP. Personally I have no idea which particular images you are talking about. Can you post some examples here for the other users to judge, or would it be illegal to post the things you've been looking at?
> Ladies and gents, we are in the presence of a true genius!
Honor virtutis praemium :)
> > To which "old art" are you referring?
> I already said which.
You described some images you've been looking at that you claim are CP. Personally I have no idea which particular images you are talking about. Can you post some examples here for the other users to judge, or would it be illegal to post the things you've been looking at?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,181
@1,026,177 (K)
Answer anon S question:
@1,026,173 (S)
> >it was shoved in my face.
>
> Please elaborate; how was it "shoved" in your face?
Answer anon S question:
@1,026,173 (S)
> >it was shoved in my face.
>
> Please elaborate; how was it "shoved" in your face?
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 41 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,197
@previous (F)
Sorry, I don't answer to sockpuppets.
@1,026,180 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> I have no idea which particular images you are talking about.
Oh you.
> would it be illegal to post the things you've been looking at
I don't know, TGComix, would it be illegal to download and post your "artwork"? That's kind of what I asked you. What's wrong, TG? Why the hesitance to revert to your old arguments which you used to be so passionate about?
Sorry, I don't answer to sockpuppets.
@1,026,180 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> I have no idea which particular images you are talking about.
Oh you.
> would it be illegal to post the things you've been looking at
I don't know, TGComix, would it be illegal to download and post your "artwork"? That's kind of what I asked you. What's wrong, TG? Why the hesitance to revert to your old arguments which you used to be so passionate about?
Capt Kirk replied with this 6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,203
@previous (K)When it comes to the truth.
Arrogance and Hypocrisy
Like a tuberous heifer assuming all men unaroused by her "sassy" personality the smell of necrotic flesh are gay, TG Comics makes a few assumptions and derisions of its own.
TG Comics contains a mindful warning about the ocular penetration encompassed within. Some may find the presence of a "decline" option redundant due to a convenient button located in the top left corner of most browsers.
The purpose of this an option is not to spare the user a few pixels to the left and up, but rather to arouse ire.
Rather than redirecting the viewer back to whichever dark site set him upon this abomination, the site redirects the user to Chick Cartoon Tracts.
Does anyone uncomfortable with the material have a keen appreciation for Mr. Chick's work? Femur thinks so, whilst simultaneously deriding many stereotypes about transsexuals.
Premise
The site's premise is that women are infinitely superior to men in their enlightened role as sex objects. Everything a woman experiences is pure matriarchal bliss, men only disposable tools her entitled destiny. The men are accurately depicted as sex-starved imbeciles, and the women and ex-men are glorified hedonists, happy to engage in such productive pursuits as:
Becoming a maid
Stripping
Prostitution
Becoming a vampire date rapist
One-Night Stands
Masturbation
Marrying a rich man
The comics, in a clever literary ploy unrivaled by Shakespeare, omit pesky plot or even filler in favor of a string of sex and masturbation scenes jimmied together with undeveloped dialogue. In short, 99.9% of them are about a dude transforming into a chick. Then he buys shoes and pisses with his new vagina on the ground outside KFC.
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,215
@1,026,178 (G)
Careful, TGComix will accuse you of posting CP and shoving it in all our faces... oh wait, that's right, he doesn't really think his deviant art content is CP.
> I think he knows he's backed himself into a corner here by being tricked into admitting to drawing CP.
Careful, TGComix will accuse you of posting CP and shoving it in all our faces... oh wait, that's right, he doesn't really think his deviant art content is CP.
> I think he knows he's backed himself into a corner here by being tricked into admitting to drawing CP.
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,217
@previous (K)
> Careful, TGComix will accuse you of posting CP and shoving it in all our faces...
You're embarrassing yourself.
> Careful, TGComix will accuse you of posting CP and shoving it in all our faces...
You're embarrassing yourself.
Capt Kirk replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,218
@1,026,215 (K)
One reason I did not link that site. Images are small unless clicked and I am not about to click them.
One reason I did not link that site. Images are small unless clicked and I am not about to click them.
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,220
@1,026,217 (F)
Whatever you say, TG2comixsockpuppet.
@previous (Capt Kirk)
> One reason I did not link that site. Images are small unless clicked and I am not about to click them.
Yes, a wise decision I think.
Whatever you say, TG2comixsockpuppet.
@previous (Capt Kirk)
> One reason I did not link that site. Images are small unless clicked and I am not about to click them.
Yes, a wise decision I think.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U replied with this 6 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,293
@1,026,197 (K)
> I don't know, TGComix, would it be illegal to download and post your "artwork"?
I'll ask you again: what is this "artwork" that has obsessed you so much?
> That's kind of what I asked you.
You're asking me to tell you what pictures you've been looking at online? Dear Lord you are in a muddle here aren't you? :)
> Why the hesitance to revert to your old arguments which you used to be so passionate about?
Which "arguments that used to be so passionate about"? Post examples please.
> I don't know, TGComix, would it be illegal to download and post your "artwork"?
I'll ask you again: what is this "artwork" that has obsessed you so much?
> That's kind of what I asked you.
You're asking me to tell you what pictures you've been looking at online? Dear Lord you are in a muddle here aren't you? :)
> Why the hesitance to revert to your old arguments which you used to be so passionate about?
Which "arguments that used to be so passionate about"? Post examples please.
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,294
Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 55 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,299
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,300
@previous (T)
> > Post examples please.
> Requesting CP - ban
So you're saying that what anon K has been looking at is CP? Yikes! What a pedofilth he is.
> > Post examples please.
> Requesting CP - ban
So you're saying that what anon K has been looking at is CP? Yikes! What a pedofilth he is.
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,317
@1,026,293 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> I'll ask you again: what is this "artwork" that has obsessed you so much?
Yes, I suppose you will ask me over and over again.
> You're asking me to tell you what pictures you've been looking at online?
Yup, you got it.
> Which "arguments that I used to be so passionate about"?
Let me fix that editing mess for you.
> Post examples please.
"That picture could easily be of an eighteen year-old girl wearing a school uniform. Very common for adult women to dress as schoolgirls in Japan BTW." - TGComix
"Simon Kirby, aka TGcomix, Gauis Marius, GM and Chance Blacktown is a true internet warrior, a fallen hero who faced down an army of hate for the sake of artistic freedom." - seems quite passionate to me
By the way, your sockpuppet seems to have betrayed you; yes, what pedofilth you are.
> I'll ask you again: what is this "artwork" that has obsessed you so much?
Yes, I suppose you will ask me over and over again.
> You're asking me to tell you what pictures you've been looking at online?
Yup, you got it.
> Which "arguments that I used to be so passionate about"?
Let me fix that editing mess for you.
> Post examples please.
"That picture could easily be of an eighteen year-old girl wearing a school uniform. Very common for adult women to dress as schoolgirls in Japan BTW." - TGComix
"Simon Kirby, aka TGcomix, Gauis Marius, GM and Chance Blacktown is a true internet warrior, a fallen hero who faced down an army of hate for the sake of artistic freedom." - seems quite passionate to me
By the way, your sockpuppet seems to have betrayed you; yes, what pedofilth you are.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,322
Ok so not to undercut the brutal takedown of our resident child molestation enthusiast, but was there even anyone here who was on his side that this argument is supposed to convince?
Anonymous Q replied with this 6 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,325
Okay then, so nobody really cares that Dave isn't TG. I guess they just enjoy saying that he is.
Anonymous T replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,347
@previous (Q)
Not sure if Dave is TG but quite sure Merrin is. He's never denied it and frequently responds to posts directed to TGComix as Merrin. On the other hand he has denied being Dave, though that may be because he doesn't want people to know where he lives.
Not sure if Dave is TG but quite sure Merrin is. He's never denied it and frequently responds to posts directed to TGComix as Merrin. On the other hand he has denied being Dave, though that may be because he doesn't want people to know where he lives.
Anonymous U joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,348
Whoever voted for the middle option a tenth time, and changed the percentage from 69% should be ionized.
Anonymous Q replied with this 6 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,358
@1,026,347 (T)
Merrin is almost certainly Dave. Has the exact same mannerism when he gets troll-y, and he once said that he speaks a Slavic language (Russian, but he didn't specify to hide his identity).
I can't see Merrin being TG, though. TG was really obnoxious about his pedophilia, liked to rub if in people's faces. Merrin on the other hand just brushes it off.
@previous (U)
A penis poll is funnier.
Merrin is almost certainly Dave. Has the exact same mannerism when he gets troll-y, and he once said that he speaks a Slavic language (Russian, but he didn't specify to hide his identity).
I can't see Merrin being TG, though. TG was really obnoxious about his pedophilia, liked to rub if in people's faces. Merrin on the other hand just brushes it off.
@previous (U)
A penis poll is funnier.
Anonymous U replied with this 6 years ago, 23 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,359
Anonymous Q replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,361
@previous (U)
But if you think about it, making the middle bar bigger is like stroking the penis. It's still pretty funny.
But if you think about it, making the middle bar bigger is like stroking the penis. It's still pretty funny.
Anonymous U replied with this 6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,363
Anonymous K replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,026,415
@1,026,358 (Q)
> he once said that he speaks a Slavic language (Russian, but he didn't specify to hide his identity).
I don't think he speaks Russian. If anything it's Polish - he slipped up once by saying that if he were to become pope (a horrifying thought) then he'd be the second person from his native country to do so. There are only four possible countries which that could be and only one in which a Slavic language is spoken.
> I can't see Merrin being TG, though. TG was really obnoxious about his pedophilia, liked to rub if in people's faces. Merrin on the other hand just brushes it off.
Could be a different tactic. Getting on the defensive about pedophilia never used to turn out very well for him. Larping as this Catholic priest however seems to work better... except of course when it comes to his poor knowledge of Latin and Roman Catholicism.
> he once said that he speaks a Slavic language (Russian, but he didn't specify to hide his identity).
I don't think he speaks Russian. If anything it's Polish - he slipped up once by saying that if he were to become pope (a horrifying thought) then he'd be the second person from his native country to do so. There are only four possible countries which that could be and only one in which a Slavic language is spoken.
> I can't see Merrin being TG, though. TG was really obnoxious about his pedophilia, liked to rub if in people's faces. Merrin on the other hand just brushes it off.
Could be a different tactic. Getting on the defensive about pedophilia never used to turn out very well for him. Larping as this Catholic priest however seems to work better... except of course when it comes to his poor knowledge of Latin and Roman Catholicism.