Topic: I saw the new Quentin Tarantino movie last night, spoilers
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC started this discussion 6 years ago#89,947
And I didnt get for it. It was like and hour and 45 minutes long and so much could have been cut from it to tighten it up. Every time that an actor got into a car, I would groan because the car driving scenes were accessively long. Also I found the ending to be kind of disrespectful. Brad Pitt and Leonardo Dicaprio kill the Manson hippies and Sharon Tate and her friends don't die. This I didn't like because it felt like it spit upon the real horrid truth
> And I didnt get for it. It was like and hour and 45 minutes long and so much could have been cut from it to tighten it up. Every time that an actor got into a car, I would groan because the car driving scenes were accessively long. Also I found the ending to be kind of disrespectful. Brad Pitt and Leonardo Dicaprio kill the Manson hippies and Sharon Tate and her friends don't die. This I didn't like because it felt like it spit upon the real horrid truth
Are you drunk?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,025,415
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,025,422
Manson made those people kill. If he would have told them to take two months to fill a bathtub with their pee and then hold their heads in in till they drowned they would have done it. He had total and complete control of them.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 33 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,025,423
@OP
Have you really never heard of using real life people and events as elements of fiction?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,025,465
terri !RwordOooFE joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,025,467
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
i agree w you though like I really don't want to see Brad pitt save Sharon Tate in any context it seems like a slap in the face. same as Brad Pitt beating up an aggressive Bruce Lee but w/e I don't care it was a Tarantino movie what did you expect
respect for the dead?? respect for the audience?? never
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 28 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,025,485
@previous (terri !RwordOooFE)
YEAH I didn't like the Bruce Lee thing either
Sco Pa tu Manaa joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 42 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,025,486
> And I didnt get for it. It was like and hour and 45 minutes long and so much could have been cut from it to tighten it up. Every time that an actor got into a car, I would groan because the car driving scenes were accessively long. Also I found the ending to be kind of disrespectful. Brad Pitt and Leonardo Dicaprio kill the Manson hippies and Sharon Tate and her friends don't die. This I didn't like because it felt like it spit upon the real horrid truth
It was more respectful having them live rather than exploiting their deaths as entertainment and watching them get re-murdered on screen.
You just aren’t smart enough to understand it
Sco Pa tu Manaa double-posted this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,025,489
The title of the movie is “Once Upon a Time” it’s literally a fairy tale with a happy ending
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,025,491
@1,025,486 (Sco Pa tu Manaa)
If it is disrectful to have their deaths in a film, then they shouldn't have been added at all
Anonymous C replied with this 6 years ago, 2 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,025,492
Tarantino sucked more cocks that Richard Simmons.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,025,494
Also there is a huge amount of feet shots which is funny to me because he has a rumored fetish
Sco Pa tu Manaa replied with this 6 years ago, 47 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,025,495
Firstly the movie is way longer than an hour and 45, secondly your spelling here is unusually shit ("accessively"), and thirdly you're complaining about a lack of historical accuracy in a film directed by Tarantino.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 59 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,025,499
@1,025,495 (Sco Pa tu Manaa)
Listen, this movie had a good chunk of violence ta the end, but I didn't go for that. I went because I wanted to see a movie and I had already seen the rest of the films available or the were Pets 2.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC (OP) double-posted this 6 years ago, 41 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,025,501
@1,025,498 (B)
I meant 2 hours and 45 minutes and I had just woken up
Anonymous D replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,025,619
@1,025,465 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Then why is it disrespectful? It's not like Tarantino is saying the real Sharon Tate wasn't brutally murdered by the Manson hippies. We know she was, and we know it was a horrific crime, but this is not that story. It's fiction.
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,025,653
@previous (D)
Because it was only partially fiction and what I consider to be a recent enough crime. Also it seems bizarre to me, the way that they did it. It's not like they had the victims fight back or anything, and so gave them no power
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,025,698
Quentin Tarantino is stuck in a fever dream where Brad Pitt travels through time organizing the death of all the bad guys of history.