Topic: gun control.
Anonymous A started this discussion 6 years ago #89,771
A drunk driver crashes his car into a sober driver. The only way to stop this from happening again is to take all the cars from sober drivers.
The same is true for gun control.
The same is true for gun control.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 56 seconds later[^] [v] #1,023,743
If only the shooter had attacked a state where everyone owns guns, like Texas, then he would have been stopped before he could kill anyone.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 14 seconds later, 1 minute after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,745
Interesting how countries like Holland and so many Eu countries that limit guns, do not have this problem.
Gun control works for them.
Gun control works for them.
Autist !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,768
Or ban alcohol.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,845
@1,023,743 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> If only the shooter had attacked a state where everyone owns guns, like Texas, then he would have been stopped before he could kill anyone.
> If only the shooter had attacked a state where everyone owns guns, like Texas, then he would have been stopped before he could kill anyone.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,846
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,848
@1,023,743 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
@1,023,845 (E)
That's not a very good argument, and not the point I'm making.
@1,023,845 (E)
That's not a very good argument, and not the point I'm making.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 34 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,857
@previous (A)
What the fuck point are you making? If we criminalize cars only drunk drivers will drive? Even as a metaphor that sounds strained and poorly thought out.
What the fuck point are you making? If we criminalize cars only drunk drivers will drive? Even as a metaphor that sounds strained and poorly thought out.
Spartacus !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,859
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 31 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,863
tteh !GETFUCKED joined in and replied with this 6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,864
Spartacus !Pool..v42s replied with this 6 years ago, 31 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,868
Anonymous G replied with this 6 years ago, 25 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,875
@1,023,863 (I)
LOL You seem to get it. Maybe you should coach OP on his metaphors.
It's a stupid, tired argument anyway. The law is there to define criminal behavior. I don't expect criminals to obey traffic laws or property rights either. That's not an argument for more lenient traffic laws or property rights.
LOL You seem to get it. Maybe you should coach OP on his metaphors.
It's a stupid, tired argument anyway. The law is there to define criminal behavior. I don't expect criminals to obey traffic laws or property rights either. That's not an argument for more lenient traffic laws or property rights.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,023,876
@1,023,863 (I)
Apply that to any law. Do you think criminals will obey rape laws? No? then let's eliminate them!
Apply that to any law. Do you think criminals will obey rape laws? No? then let's eliminate them!